Rock and Soil Mechanics ›› 2024, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (5): 1495-1504.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2023.0835

• Fundamental Theory and Experimental Research • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Embedment mechanism of a drag anchor in layered soils considering shank effect

XIONG Shu-sen1, HUANG Yun-han2, LAI Ying3   

  1. 1. Center for Hypergravity Experimental and Interdisciplinary Research, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310058, China; 2. College of Civil and Harbor Engineering, Jiangsu Ocean University, Lianyungang, Jiangsu 222002, China; 3. College of Civil Engineering, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310058, China
  • Received:2023-06-15 Accepted:2023-10-06 Online:2024-05-11 Published:2024-05-07
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (52279112).

Abstract: The development of deep water mooring system and its mooring foundation has become a key issue in the development of clean energy "offshore wind power" projects. The drag embedment anchor, owing to its high bearing capacity and ease of installation, presents promising prospects. A prediction model for the trajectory, pitch angle and capacity of the anchor in layered soil, considering the effect of shank, is established based on the upper limit analysis. Verification of the model using existing model tests demonstrates that the trajectory prediction error of the model, accounting for the shank effect is limited to 13.5%. Furthermore, compared with the model that does not consider the shank effect, the trajectory and angle prediction error are reduced by 78.32% and 36.9% respectively. The strength, thickness and depth of stiff layer jointly restrict the embedding capability of the anchor. The influence of strength is found to be the most significant, with a higher strength ratio leading to a shallower embedding depth until the stiff layer becomes impenetrable. Additionally, greater depth is associated with increased bearing capacity. When the stiff layer can be penetrated, depth has minimal impact on trajectory and angle. However, when the stiff layer cannot be penetrated, the greater depth will result in a deeper embedment depth and smaller final angle. Lastly, the thickness of the stiff layer is found to positively correlate with the bearing capacity during the embedding process.

Key words: drag anchor, prediction model, layered soils, shank effect, trajectory

CLC Number: 

  • TU 452
[1] DING Qian-shen, JIN Jia-xu, CAO Tian-shu, LIU Lei, . Effect of aerobic degradation on settlement characteristics of municipal solid waste and dry unit weight prediction model [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(10): 3065-3076.
[2] ZHOU Feng-xi, ZHAO Wen-cang. Estimating unfrozen water content in unsaturated frozen soils based on soil water characteristic curve [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2024, 45(9): 2719-2727.
[3] HE Zheng, XIE Mo-wen, WU Zhi-xiang, ZHAO Chen, SUN Guang-cun, XU Le, . Field measurement study on the pre-collapse inclination deformation characteristics of tension-cracking slope rock mass using micro-core-pile sensor [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2024, 45(11): 3399-3415.
[4] GUI Yue, XIE Zheng-peng, GAO Yu-feng, . Influence and mechanism of organic matter on thermal conductivity of clay soil [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2023, 44(S1): 154-162.
[5] LEI Hua-yang, BO Yu, MA Chang-yuan, WANG Lei, ZHANG Wei-di, . Variation pattern and prediction model of clay specific heat capacity considering multi-factors [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2023, 44(S1): 1-11.
[6] ZHANG Jin-liang, YANG Feng-wei, CAO Zhi-guo, SU Wei-lin, . Experimental study on ultra-high pressure water jet rock-breaking at high linear speed [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2023, 44(3): 615-623.
[7] WANG Shu-wen, JU Wen-jun, ZHANG Chun-hui, SU Shi-jie, LU Chuang, . Stress jumping of elastic-brittle circular coal roadway and prediction model of rock burst [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2023, 44(3): 873-883.
[8] ZHENG Si-wei, HU Ming-jian, HUO Yu-long, LI Yu, . Analysis of factors affecting permeability of calcareous sand in salt solution environment [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2023, 44(12): 3522-3530.
[9] JIN Jia-xu, ZHU Lei, LIU Lei, CHEN Yi-jun, YAO Yuan, GAO Teng-fei, LI Ruo-xin, . Gas pressure monitoring test and prediction model of single well aeration in landfill [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2023, 44(1): 259-267.
[10] MA Jian-jun, HAN Shu-juan, GAO Xiao-juan, LI Da, GUO Ying, . Dynamic response analysis of the partially-embedded single pile affected by scour in layered soils [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2022, 43(6): 1705-1716.
[11] LIU Xin-xi, LI Bin, WANG Wei-wei, HE Cheng, LI Song. Calculation of active earth pressure of finite soil based on layered principal stress trajectory [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2022, 43(5): 1175-1186.
[12] CHEN Rui, ZHANG Xing, HAO Ruo-yu, BAO Wei-xing. Shear strength deterioration of geopolymer stabilized loess under wet-dry cycles: mechanisms and prediction model [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2022, 43(5): 1164-1174.
[13] ZHANG Wen-gang, GU Xin, LIU Han-long, ZHANG Qing, WANG Lin, WANG Lu-qi, . Probabilistic back analysis of soil parameters and displacement prediction of unsaturated slopes using Bayesian updating [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2022, 43(4): 1112-1122.
[14] WANG Hai-man, NI Wan-kui. Prediction model of saturated/unsaturated permeability coefficient of compacted loess with different dry densities [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2022, 43(3): 729-736.
[15] JIANG Shuai, ZHU Yong, LI Qing, ZHOU Hui, TU Hong-liang, YANG Fan-jie, . Dynamic prediction and influence factors analysis of ground surface settlement during tunnel excavation [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2022, 43(1): 195-204.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!