Rock and Soil Mechanics ›› 2024, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (6): 1824-1834.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2023.1037

• Geotechnical Engineering • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Dynamic prediction model of mining subsidence combined with improved Weibull time function

ZHANG Yan-jun1, YAN Yue-guan1, LONG Si-fang2, ZHU Yuan-hao1, DAI Hua-yang1, KONG Jia-yuan1   

  1. 1. College of Geoscience and Surveying Engineering, China University of Mining and Technology-Beijing, Beijing 100083, China; 2. College of Biosystems Engineering and Food Science, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310058, China
  • Received:2023-07-17 Accepted:2023-10-13 Online:2024-06-19 Published:2024-06-20
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the Major Program of the National Natural Science Foundation of China (52394191) and the China University of Mining and Technology (Beijing): Doctoral Top-notch Innovative Talents Cultivation Fund (BBJ2023018, BBJ2023023).

Abstract: Coal mining-induced surface subsidence is a complex, multi-dimensional dynamic process. Dynamic prediction plays a crucial role in determining the magnitude of deformation at any location and time above the goaf, thereby safeguarding ground infrastructure and human life. To achieve dynamic prediction of surface subsidence, an improved Weibull time function model with a single model parameter was developed to address the limitations of the complex structure of the existing model, based on mining subsidence theory. This enhanced model accurately describes surface point subsidence, subsidence velocity, and subsidence acceleration. Additionally, a new dynamic prediction model for mining subsidence was established by integrating the improved Weibull time function model with the existing surface subsidence basin model. The method for determining model parameters and their impact on the shape of the subsidence basin was elaborated in detail. The model’s prediction accuracy and applicability were validated using measured data from working faces 313 and 3214 in a mine. The results indicate that the maximum root mean square error of the improved Weibull time function model is 52 mm, with a maximum relative error of 2.1%, representing a 60.3% and 64.4% improvement, respectively, over the previous version. The predicted subsidence curve shape of the mining subsidence dynamic prediction model aligns with the measured subsidence curve shape, with a maximum root mean square error of 17 mm and a maximum relative error of 1.76%, demonstrating the model’s ability to predict surface subsidence processes with high applicability and reliability. These research findings offer valuable insights for the dynamic prediction of surface subsidence in mining areas.

Key words: Weibull time function, mining subsidence, subsidence basin, dynamic prediction

CLC Number: 

  • TD325
[1] JIANG Shuai, ZHU Yong, LI Qing, ZHOU Hui, TU Hong-liang, YANG Fan-jie, . Dynamic prediction and influence factors analysis of ground surface settlement during tunnel excavation [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2022, 43(1): 195-204.
[2] GUO Xu-wei, YANG Xiao-qin, CHAI Shuang-wu. Optimization of the segmented Knothe function and its dynamic parameter calculation [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(6): 2091-2097.
[3] LIU Wen-sheng, WU Zuo-qi, LIANG Huai-jie,. The experimental study on structural parameters of unconsolidated layers soil of Nanpiao mining [J]. , 2017, 38(6): 1725-1732.
[4] ZHANG Bing, CUI Xi-min, . Optimization of segmented Knothe time function model for dynamic prediction of mining subsidence [J]. , 2017, 38(2): 541-548.
[5] XU Guo-sheng,LI De-hai,HOU De-feng,ZHANG Yan-bin. Measurement and prediction of the transientsurface movement and deformation induced by mining under thick alluvium [J]. , 2016, 37(7): 2056-2062.
[6] ZHAO Xiao-dong, CHEN Yang, JIANG Jian. Probability integral method of arbitrary shape face to predict mining subsidence and its application [J]. , 2016, 37(12): 3387-3392.
[7] LIU Yu-cheng. Dynamic surface subsidence curve model based on Weibull time function [J]. , 2013, 34(8): 2409-2413.
[8] WANG Zheng-shuai , DENG Ka-zhong. Richards model of surface dynamic subsidence prediction in mining area [J]. , 2011, 32(6): 1664-1668.
[9] WANG Xiao-lin ,SHUAI Jian,ZHANG Jian-qiang . Mechanical response analysis of buried pipeline crossing mining subsidence area [J]. , 2011, 32(11): 3373-3378.
[10] LIU Yu-cheng,CAO Shu-gang,LIU Yan-bao. Discussion on some time functions for describing dynamic course of surface subsidence due to mining [J]. , 2010, 31(3): 925-931.
[11] ZHANG Chun-hui, ZHAO Quan-sheng. Early warning system of mining subsidence damage based on ARCGIS [J]. , 2009, 30(7): 2197-2202.
[12] ZHANG Shu-feng, SUN Shu-lin, JIANG Zhi-qiang. Analysis and dynamic prediction of longitudinal ground settlements due to shield tunneling based on delayed difference equation [J]. , 2008, 29(1): 182-186.
[13] REN Song, JIANG De-yi, YANG Chun-he, JIANG Zai-wen. Study on a new probability integral 3D model for forecasting solution mining subsidence of rock s [J]. , 2007, 28(1): 133-138.
[14] XIAO Wu-quan, LENG Wu-ming. Real-time modeling and dynamic predicting of settlement of soft soil roadbeds [J]. , 2005, 26(9): 1481-1484.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!