Rock and Soil Mechanics ›› 2024, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (7): 2187-2194.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2023.0341

• Numerical Analysis • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Numerical simulation of the uplift capacity of suction caisson foundation in sandy soil: effects of mooring depth

JI Hui1, PENG Yu2, WU Ze-xiang3, TU Dong-mei4   

  1. 1. People’s Liberation Army of China 32576, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510110, China; 2. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong 999077, China; 3. College of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Wenzhou University, Wenzhou, Zhejiang 325000, China; 4. Department of Architecture and Civil Engineering, Wenzhou university of technology, Wenzhou, Zhejiang 325035, China
  • Received:2023-03-20 Accepted:2023-07-05 Online:2024-07-10 Published:2024-07-23
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by Special Project for Scientific and Technological Innovation in the Yangtze River Delta (2022CSJGG1201) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (52178352).

Abstract: The micro-mechanisms of suction caisson-soil interaction under the action of inclined mooring lines remain unclear. In this study, a coupled discrete element method (DEM) and finite element method (FEM) was adopted to investigate this issue from macro- to micro-scales, with a focus on the influence of mooring depth. The sand particles were simulated by DEM, and the suction caisson was simulated by FEM. The mooring line tension was simulated by controlling the roller motion. The results revealed that the differences in the evolution of the force-displacement curves were attributed to the differences in the suction caisson motion modes at different mooring depths. The mooring depth differences caused significant differences in the vertical pull-out displacement, rotation angle, and deformation of the suction caisson. The critical reverse mooring depth point of suction caisson rotation direction and pull-out displacement is located near the depth of h = 66.7% from the top of the suction caisson (i.e., 2/3 of the suction caisson depth). Moreover, the deformation behavior of the soil was analyzed at the scale of particles, ultimately determining the failure mode of the interaction between the suction caisson and the particle soil. The study showed that neglecting the mooring depth of the mooring line may lead to a misjudgment of the bearing capacity of the suction caisson and the failure mode of the soil.

Key words: suction bucket, anti-pulling, coupled DEM-FEM, depth effect, soil deformation

CLC Number: 

  • O 451
[1] ZHANG Yu-kun, ZHANG Heng, LI Da-yong, XIANG Qian, . Influence of spudcan penetration and extraction on motion behavior and lateral bearing capacity of adjacent suction caisson [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(8): 2325-2338.
[2] ZHOU Guang-yuan, GAN Fei, ZHENG Gang, ZHOU Hai-zuo, WANG Hong, BI Jing, LIU Biao, ZHANG Yuan-yin, . Calculation method of negative skin friction for end-bearing piles based on soil deformation [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(3): 930-942.
[3] GUO Jing-zhuo, ZHENG Gang, ZHAO Lin-song, PAN Jun, ZHANG Zong-jun, ZHOU Qiang, CHENG Xue-song, . Experimental study of soil deformation and pore pressure caused by multi-row grouting [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2023, 44(3): 896-907.
[4] ZHANG Xin, DONG Hao, XU Ying-ying, WANG Liu-yue, . Experimental study on the bearing capacity of piles in sand under cyclic loading [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2023, 44(3): 673-684.
[5] GUO Kai-feng, ZHANG Yi-ping. Experimental study on the mechanism of gas accumulation and soil deformation in double-layered soil [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2023, 44(1): 99-108.
[6] LUO Guan-yong, ZHONG Miao, CAO Hong, PAN Hong, . Measured data and numerical simulation analysis of shield tunneling in sand [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2022, 43(S2): 563-574.
[7] WANG Xin-bo, WANG Lu-jun, ZHU Bin, WANG Peng, YUAN Si-min, CHEN Yun-min, . Experimental study of behavior of hydrate-bearing sediments during servo depressurization [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2022, 43(9): 2360-2370.
[8] SHI Dan-da, YU Kuai, MAO Yi-yao, YUAN Yuan, HAO Dong-xue, HU Wei, . Experimental study on the uplift behavior and soil deformation characteristics of the double-blade screw anchor in loose sand [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2022, 43(11): 3059-3072.
[9] BAO Ning, WEI Jing, CHEN Jian-feng. Three dimensional discrete element analysis of soil arching in piled embankment [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(S1): 347-354.
[10] XU Ri-qing, CHENG Kang, YING Hong-wei, LIN Cun-gang, LIANG Rong-zhu, FENG Su-yang, . Deformation response of a tunnel under foundation pit unloading considering buried depth and shearing effect [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(S1): 195-207.
[11] CHENG Yong-hui, HU Sheng-gang, WANG Han-wu, ZHANG Cheng. Study on depth effect of pressuremeter feature parameters in deep buried sand [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(6): 1881-1886.
[12] SHI Dan-da, MAO Yi-yao, YANG Yong, YUAN Yuan, HAO Dong-xue, . Experimental study on the deformation characteristics of soils around uplift circular plate anchors using digital image correlation technology [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(10): 3201-3213.
[13] XIAO Zhong, GE Bo-rui, WANG Yuan-zhan, WANG Yan, . Influence of cruciform inner clapboards on uniaxial bearing capacity and failure mode of bucket foundation [J]. , 2017, 38(11): 3136-3144.
[14] ZHANG Xin,YUE Jin-chao,LIU Han-dong,. Experimental study of soil deformation around group anchors in sand [J]. , 2016, 37(S1): 240-248.
[15] JIA Ya-jie, LIANG Fa-yun, CUI Zhen-dong, YE Hua,. Analysis of soil deformation caused by decompression of confined water based on displacement coordination condition [J]. , 2016, 37(S1): 42-48.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!