Rock and Soil Mechanics ›› 2024, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (S1): 761-770.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2023.1355

• Numerical Analysis • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Prediction of consolidation settlement of heterogeneous ground based on iterative co-Kriging inversion method

GAO Xu1, SONG Kun2, LI Ling3, YAN E-chuan1, WANG Wei-ming1   

  1. 1. Faculty of Engineering, China University of Geosciences (Wuhan), Wuhan, Hubei 430074, China; 2. Hubei Key Laboratory of Disaster Prevention and Mitigation, China Three Gorges University, Yichang, Hubei 443002, China; 3. Xiangyang Geological Engineering Survey Institute Co., Ltd., Xiangyang, Hubei 441003, China
  • Received:2023-09-10 Accepted:2024-01-08 Online:2024-09-18 Published:2024-09-21
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (42102328) and the Open Fund of Hubei Key Laboratory of Disaster Prevention and Mitigation (China Three Gorges University) (2021KJZ03).

Abstract: Currently, the prediction of ground consolidation settlement through inversion is primarily based on the assumption of soil homogeneity or stratification. However, it is a well-established fact that the hydrological and mechanical parameters of natural ground exhibit spatial variability. To address this issue, an iterative co-Kriging inversion method that utilizes settlement and pore pressure monitoring data for high-resolution inversion is introduced, aiming to depict the spatially non-uniform distribution of ground soil parameters. The resolution of the data employed for inversion characterization is coupled with sensitivity analysis to elucidate the underlying mechanism. The findings indicate that the parameter field obtained through this method represents the optimal unbiased estimate. Employing both settlement and pore pressure observation data for inversion to characterize the heterogeneous ground proves more effective than utilizing solely settlement or pore pressure data for such analysis. Furthermore, a higher resolution leads to improved predictive accuracy of ground consolidation and settlement. The inversion resolution of various observation information types for different parameters is positively associated with the sensitivity magnitude of observation information to parameters.

Key words: iterative co-Kriging, inversion method, heterogeneous ground, prediction of consolidation settlement, sensitivity

CLC Number: 

  • P642
[1] JIN Jie-fang, XIONG Hui-ying, XIAO You-feng, PENG Xiao-wang. Experimental study on sensitivity and propagation attenuation characteristics of rock ultrasonic wave under three-dimensional in-situ stress [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(S1): 183-194.
[2] LI Xiao-jun, ZHANG Yu-xiao, RONG Mian-shui, NI Ping-he. Bayesian inversion method for soil layer velocity structure and its application [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(7): 2237-2254.
[3] ZHANG Tian-jun, TIAN Jia-wei, ZHANG Lei, PANG Ming-kun, PAN Hong-yu, MENG Wei, HE Sui-nan, . Permeability and tortuosity evolution of crushed coal under cyclic loading [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(5): 1409-1418.
[4] KANG Jia-wei, DENG Guo-hua, KANG Zuo, . Strength classification and evaluation method for saturated loess using pressuremeter test method [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2024, 45(S1): 557-567.
[5] FENG Shi-jin, XU Yi, YANG Jun-yi, ZHENG Qi-teng, ZHANG Xiao-lei, . Risk assessment of landfill instability based on set pair-combination weighting [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2024, 45(7): 2129-2139.
[6] CAO Jian-jun, HU Bin, WANG Ze-qi, LI Jing, . Creep damage model of weak interlayer based on fractional order integral [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2024, 45(2): 454-464.
[7] MA Ji-yuan, CHENG Guo-qiang, LI Xia-ying, YANG Ling-xue, LI Qi, MA Jing, CHEN Bo-wen, YANG Chuan-feng, ZHANG Yao, LI Feng-yang, YU Tao, HU Ting, XU Zong-hong, ZHONG Yi-yan, . Influencing factors of caprock sealing performance for multi-layer CO2 injection [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2024, 45(11): 3447-3460.
[8] WANG Chuang-ye, YAN Yu-hang, SUI Qing-rui, ZHU Huang-jin, YOU Ru, GUO Yu, . Acoustic and thermal anomaly signals and sensitivity coupling analysis of damage to water-saturated and dry sandstones [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2024, 45(11): 3185-3196.
[9] JIA Bao-xin, , ZHOU Zhi-yang, YUAN Wen-ya, ZHANG Jing. Vibration evaluation of buildings around high-speed railway line based on equivalent peak particle velocity [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2023, 44(9): 2696-2706.
[10] LI Xiang, WANG Jing-tong, WEI Heng. Reliability analysis of rock tunnel stability based on interval non-probability under multiple failure modes [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2023, 44(8): 2409-2418.
[11] LI Bo-nan, FU Wei, ZHANG Xue-bing, . Propagation characteristics of elastic waves in warm ice-rich frozen soil [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2023, 44(7): 1916-1924.
[12] ZHANG Liang-liang, CHENG Hua, YAO Zhi-shu, WANG Xiao-jian, . Prediction of maximum surface subsidence velocity based on improved Knothe time model [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2023, 44(4): 1111-1119.
[13] CHEN Yong, SU Jian, CAO Ling, WANG li, WANG Shi-mei, . Evolution law of the soil-water characteristic curve based on data mining method [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2022, 43(S2): 23-34.
[14] LIU Xiao-hu, YAO Zhi-shu, CHENG Hua, ZHA Wen-hua, WU Jie-hao, . Analysis and application of catastrophe instability mechanism of intersection point in a deep roadway [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2022, 43(S1): 521-531.
[15] ZHOU Bing-hong. A simplified method to estimate soil-water characteristic curve for sandy soil [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2022, 43(S1): 222-228.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!