Rock and Soil Mechanics ›› 2025, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (12): 3985-3997.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2025.0282

• Geotechnical Engineering • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Soil seismic liquefaction discrimination model based on support vector machine

FAN Meng1, 2, YANG Zheng-quan1, 2, LI Jing-jun1, 2, LIU Xiao-sheng1, 2, ZHAO Jian-ming1, 2   

  1. 1. State Key Laboratory of Water Cycle and Water Security, China Institute of Water Resources and Hydropower Research, Beijing 100038, China; 2. Engineering Research Center on Anti-Earthquake and Emergency Support Techniques of Hydraulic Projects, Ministry of Water Resources, Beijing 100048, China
  • Received:2025-03-18 Accepted:2025-05-26 Online:2025-12-11 Published:2025-12-20
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (2017YFC0404905), the China Institute of Water Resource and Hydropower Research Basic Research Funds Special Project (GE0145B052021) and the China Institute of Water Resource and Hydropower Research Scientific and Technological Achievements Transformation Fund (GE121003A0032024, GE121003A0032022).

Abstract: One of the important tasks in the study of sand liquefaction is to assess soil liquefaction likelihood. Based on the field liquefaction investigation cases, the correlation degree between each factor and liquefaction was given by grey relational degree method, and the relationships between factors from seismic load, soil environment, soil properties and liquefaction were analyzed. The support vector machine (SVM) algorithm and Platt scaling principle were then used to construct a probabilistic model for liquefaction assessment, and comparative study was conducted with existing deterministic and probabilistic liquefaction assessment methods to analyze its effectiveness. The model was then applied to actual engineering cases and its practicality was explored finally. The results indicate that it has a significant correlation with liquefaction and the influence relationship between each factor and liquefaction is complex. The overall classification accuracy of the SVM-based soil liquefaction assessment model was 89.41% for the test set and 86.67% for the validation set, higher than that of existing liquefaction assessment methods. The depth range of applicability is extended, and the model can also provide the soil liquefaction probability. The results provide a reference for probabilistic assessment of soil seismic liquefaction.

Key words: earthquake, grey relational degree, support vector machine, liquefaction assessment

CLC Number: 

  • TU435
[1] FAN Meng, LI Jing-jun, YANG Zheng-quan, LIU Xiao-sheng, ZHU Kai-bin, ZHAO Jian-ming, . Applicability of standard penetration test based liquefaction assessment methods for sandy soil in deep layer [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(7): 2085-2094.
[2] ZHAO Fei, SHI Zhen-ming, YU Song-bo, ZHOU Yuan-yuan, LI Bo, CHEN Jian-feng, ZHANG Qing-zhao, ZHENG Hong-chao. Research progress on dynamic failure and reinforcement of stratified rock slopes [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(11): 3585-3614.
[3] QIAN Fa-qiao, DENG Ya-hong, MU Huan-dong, YANG Nan, LIU Fan, WANG Meng-chen, . Seismic stability evaluation method of slope based on wavelet transform and pseudo-dynamic method [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(1): 88-96.
[4] ZHU Bin, QI Ji-lin, LI Jiang, YANG Yu-sheng, ZHANG Yi-fan, ZHAO Bo-chao, . Analysis of earthquake subsidence and key influencing factors of earth-rock dam based on seismic damage investigation [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2024, 45(S1): 619-630.
[5] XIE Zhou-zhou, ZHAO Lian-heng, LI Liang, HUANG Dong-liang, ZHANG Zi-jian, ZHOU Jing, . Difference of dynamic responses of soil-rock mixture slopes with different rock contents based on shaking table test [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2024, 45(8): 2324-2337.
[6] JIANG De-jun, HUANG Hui-bao, JU Shu-jun, GAO Qiang, JIANG Ming-cheng. Analysis of working behavior of transverse joints and dampers of Dagangshan arch dam during Luding Ms6.8 earthquake [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2024, 45(5): 1527-1539.
[7] LI Jin-yu, WANG Wei, WANG Hao-yu, YANG Yan-ke, XU Kai-fang, ZHANG Xiao-qing, XIONG Wen. Influence of liquefaction site conditions under the action of earthquake sequences [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2024, 45(5): 1551-1559.
[8] PENG Jun-guo, HUANG Yu-hao. A new calculation method for the size of anchor plates in unsaturated slope [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2024, 45(4): 1003-1013.
[9] SUN Wei, WANG Rui, ZHANG Jian-min, . Numerical simulation for liquefaction-induced shear strain localization based on peridynamics [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2024, 45(10): 3130-3138.
[10] FENG Hai-zhou, JIANG Guan-lu, HE Zi-lei, GUO Yu-feng, HU Jin-shan, LI Jie, YUAN Sheng-yang, . Dynamic response characteristics of tunnel portal slope reinforced by prestressed anchor sheet-pile wall [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2023, 44(S1): 50-62.
[11] WU Hong, YE Zhi, ZHANG Yu-ting, LIU Hua-bei, . Numerical study on seismic behavior of shield tunnel crossing saturated sandy strata with different densities [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2023, 44(4): 1204-1216.
[12] ZHANG Cong, FENG Zhong-ju, WANG Fu-chun, KONG Yuan-yuan, WANG Xi-qing, MA Xiao-qian, . Shaking table test of dynamic response of a single pile under different thicknesses of soft soil layers in a strong earthquake area [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2023, 44(4): 1100-1110.
[13] XIN Chun-lei, YANG Fei, FENG Wen-kai, LI Wen-hui, LIAO Jun. Shattering failure mechanism of step-like bedding rock slope under multi-stage earthquake excitations [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2023, 44(12): 3481-3494.
[14] LIANG Xiao-cong, CHEN Ping-shan, LIU ZHI-jun, WANG Yong-zhi, ZHU Ming-xing, . A liquefaction evaluation method for coral sand based on dynamical centrifuge model test verification [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2023, 44(11): 3173-3181.
[15] TANG Liang, MAN Xiao-feng, CONG Sheng-yi, SI Pan, LING Xian-zhang, ZHANG Xiao-yu, LI Xue-wei, , . Failure mechanism of pile foundations in liquefiable soils under seismic loading: status and challenge [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2023, 44(10): 2979-2996.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!