Rock and Soil Mechanics ›› 2025, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (7): 2281-2295.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2025.0223

• Numerical Analysis • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Numerical modeling and design optimization of a 3D cross-connected drain system in a concrete dam foundation

REN Wang1, 2, MIAO Jun3, LEI Wan-jun1, 2, WANG Luo1, 2, CHEN Yi-feng1, 2   

  1. 1. State Key Laboratory of Water Resources Engineering and Management, Wuhan University, Wuhan, Hubei 430072, China; 2. Key Laboratory of Rock Mechanics in Hydraulic Structural Engineering (Ministry of Education), Wuhan University, Wuhan, Hubei 430072, China; 3. Power China Guiyang Engineering Corporation Limited, Guiyang, Guizhou 550000, China
  • Received:2025-03-03 Accepted:2025-04-28 Online:2025-07-10 Published:2025-07-09
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No.U2340228, 52494972) and the Natural Science Foundation of Hubei Province (2022CFA028).

Abstract: Drainage is one of the most cost-effective and important seepage control measures in high-dam engineering. The multiple levels of drainage tunnels and the upwards- and downwards-drilled drainage holes constitute the 3D cross-connected drain system, but accurately modeling the drains has been one of the difficulties in the seepage analysis in hydraulic engineering. Long-term studies have shown that drains function by presenting discharge boundaries, which can be characterized by water head, no-flux, unilateral or mixed water head-unilateral boundary condition. However, it may result in erroneous modeling of the drains and the seepage field when the drain boundary conditions are incorrectly prescribed, or there lacks reliable transition algorithm for drain boundary conditions. Based on a proposed 200-m roller compacted concrete gravity dam, the control mechanism of the 3D cross-connected drain system on the seepage field is summarized, the self-equilibrated relationship of flow rate characterized by the water head-unilateral boundary condition is clarified, and the automatic transition algorithm of the boundary conditions for downwards-drilled drainage holes is presented. The simulation results of the transient seepage flow in the dam foundation show that, the core of accurately modeling the 3D cross-connected drain system is to locate the downwards-drilled drainage holes that characterized by the water head-unilateral boundary condition. When these boreholes are erroneously prescribed with no-flux boundary condition (i.e., recognized as failed), the phreatic surface is overestimated by 1.7−10.6 m; when they are erroneously prescribed with water head boundary condition (i.e., overflow occurs through their upper ends), the phreatic surface is overestimated by up to 29.4−94.5 m. Different from previous studies, the boreholes still perform well in lowering the groundwater level and pore water pressure in the dam foundation by their own self-equilibrated relationship of flow rate, where the seeped water is collected and discharged to lower boreholes, even no overflow occurs. Besides, the optimization analysis of the drain spacing implies that a drain spacing of 3 m commonly used in engineering practices is suitable, but a larger spacing of drainage holes could be suggested for those drilled downwards from the longitudinal drainage tunnel at elevation 2 928 m on the right bank. The research results are of great significance for the design and seepage safety evaluation of seepage control system of high dams.

Key words: drainage hole, boundary condition, concrete dam, transient seepage flow, design optimization

CLC Number: 

  • TU 377
[1] QIN Li-ke, GUO Rui-qi, ZHAO Hao-chen, ZHEN Gang, WANG Qi, . Capillary water dynamic distribution of stone relics under environmental evaporation conditions [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(S1): 354-365.
[2] DU Wei, NIE Ru-song, LI Lie-lie, TAN Yong-chang, ZHANG Jie, QI Yan-lu, . Discrete element simulation on aeolian sand-geogrid pull-out test with different boundary conditions [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2023, 44(6): 1849-1862.
[3] ZHENG Zi-jing, ZHU Yun-hai, WANG Qiao, XIE Hai-jian, CHEN Yun, . A semi-analytical model for analyzing the transport of organic pollutants through the geomembrane composite cut-off wall and aquifer system [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2022, 43(2): 453-465.
[4] LING Dao-sheng, ZHAO Tian-hao, NIU Jia-jun, ZHU Song, SHAN Zhen-dong, . Analytical solutions for 1D consolidation of unsaturated soils with mixed nonhomogeneous boundary conditions [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2021, 42(4): 883-891.
[5] NIAN Geng-qian, CHEN Zhong-hui, ZHANG Ling-fan, BAO Min, ZHOU Zi-han. Treatment of two boundary conditions for rainfall infiltration in slope and its application [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(12): 4105-4115.
[6] ZHAO Mi, OUYANG Wen-long, HUANG Jing-qi, DU Xiu-li, ZHAO Xu, . Analysis of axis dynamic response of rock tunnels through fault fracture zone under P waves of earthquake [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(9): 3645-3655.
[7] JIANG Zhong-ming, LIU Li-yuan, ZHAO Hai-bin, TANG Dong, HU Wei, MEI Song-hua, LI Peng, . Study of dynamic boundary conditions for thermo-mechanical coupling analysis of underground gas storage cavern [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(3): 1149-1157.
[8] HUANG Biao, LI Ming-guang, HOU Yong-mao, CHEN Jin-jian, . Effect of auto-compensating steel struts on stress and deformation behaviors of supporting structures [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2018, 39(S2): 359-365.
[9] LIU Shi-wei, SHENG Qian, ZHU Ze-qi, GONG Yan-feng, CUI Zhen, LI Jian-he, ZHANG Shan-kai,. Research on boundary effect of groundwater seepage in tunnel surrounding rock [J]. , 2018, 39(11): 4001-4009.
[10] DENG Gao-yang, XIAO Ming, CHEN Jun-tao. Simulation of seepage boundary of underground cavern based on variational inequality [J]. , 2017, 38(3): 762-768.
[11] LI Zan, LEI Guo-hui, FU Cui-wei,. Free-strain solutions for two-dimensional consolidation with a sand-wall drain [J]. , 2016, 37(6): 1613-1622.
[12] LI Lang, WANG Ming-yang, FAN Peng-xian, CHENG Yi-hao, LI Zhi-zhong, JIANG Hai-ming. Development of loading and unloading apparatus for model test in deep underground engineering [J]. , 2016, 37(1): 297-304.
[13] CHU Ya, LIU Song-yu, CAI Guo-jun, . Research and development of calibration chamber model test with in-situ injection device [J]. , 2015, 36(S1): 452-458.
[14] HOU Xiao-ping, XU Qing, CHEN Sheng-hong. An air element method for overflow boundary problem in seepage analysis [J]. , 2015, 36(8): 2345-2351.
[15] WANG Chun-guang , WANG Chang-sheng , TAO Zhi-gang , JIANG Yu-jing , TAN Yun-liang , WEI Ming-yao , CUI Guang-lei , WU Xue-zhen,. Structure deformation of coal induced by gas migration ——A case of injecting helium gas into intact coal [J]. , 2015, 36(12): 3439-3446.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!