Rock and Soil Mechanics ›› 2026, Vol. 47 ›› Issue (2): 485-496.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2025.0645

• Special Topic on Underground Engineering of Compressed Air Energy Storage • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Influence of construction gap on the force of steel lining in compressed air storage cavern

ZHANG Gui-min1, 2, SUN Wen-qing1, ZHU Ze-fan2, SU Yong-kang1, ZHU Xu-cong1   

  1. 1. School of Mechanics and Civil Engineering, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou, Jiangsu 221116, China; 2. State Key Laboratory of Intelligent Construction and Healthy Operation and Maintenance of Deep Underground Engineering, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou, Jiangsu 221116, China
  • Received:2025-06-20 Accepted:2025-11-17 Online:2026-02-10 Published:2026-02-04
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (42177124) and the Frontier Technologies R&D Program of Jiangsu (BF2024056).

Abstract: Due to the inevitable dry shrinkage of concrete, there will be construction gaps between the steel lining and concrete lining of the compressed gas energy storage artificial chamber, which brings great risks to the stability and tightness of the artificial chamber. In order to study the influence of construction gaps on the force of the steel lining of the compressed gas energy storage artificial chamber, a theoretical analysis method was proposed to simplify the concrete lining-surrounding rock double-layer cylinder model into a single-cylinder model with equivalent characterization parameters. An analytical model is developed to characterize the stress distribution in steel linings before and after gap closure. Its effectiveness is verified by numerical simulation. Based on the equivalent theoretical model, the sensitivity analysis of different parameters such as air pressure, elastic modulus of surrounding rock, cohesion of surrounding rock, friction angle of surrounding rock and burial depth is carried out. Analytical solutions for the stress in the steel lining under varying parameter conditions were obtained for both before and after the closure of the construction gap. The hoop-prestress ratio in the steel lining under various parameter settings was determined prior to the closure of the construction gap. The results indicate that the width of the construction gap is the key factor influencing the steel lining’s prestress. A larger gap leads to a greater proportion of hoop prestress and a higher hoop stress after the gap closes during gas injection. Furthermore, the internal air pressure, the elastic modulus of the surrounding rock, its cohesion, and the burial depth of the cavern significantly influence the mechanical response of the steel lining. By contrast, the friction angle of the surrounding rock exerts only a minor effect. During construction, the gap width must be strictly controlled. Furthermore, priority should be given to sites exhibiting a high elastic modulus of the surrounding rock, high rock cohesion, and greater burial depth during the site selection phase. The maximum gas storage pressure must be maintained within the permissible limit. Together, these measures underpin the gas storage facility’s long-term operational safety.

Key words: compressed air energy storage, lined rock caverns, construction gap, force analysis, numerical simulation

CLC Number: 

  • TU 93
[1] SUN Guan-hua, GENG Xuan, JIANG Chang-fei, SHI Lu, ZHANG Jin-tao, JIANG Wei. Analytical model and evolution law of the surrounding rock failure zone in lined rock caverns for compressed air energy storage power stations [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2026, 47(2): 359-372.
[2] WONG Tsun-ming, ZHAO Xiang-yang, MA Hong-ling, WANG Lei, ZHANG Jia-min. Feasibility analysis of the comprehensive utilization of coupling salt cavern CAES and insoluble sediment thermal storage [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2026, 47(2): 373-382.
[3] ZHANG Guo-hua, XIANG Yue, ZHANG Shi-shu, WANG Xin-jin, GUO Hui, XIONG Feng, HUA Dong-jie. Analysis of elastic-plastic deformation of surrounding rock mass throughout the whole operation process of the compressed air energy storage caverns [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2026, 47(2): 383-401.
[4] TAN Yun-zhi, GUO Jin-hui, WU Ke-yu, MING Hua-jun, WANG Chong, WU Jun. Development and experimental verification of constant stiffness swelling apparatus [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2026, 47(2): 402-412.
[5] GE Xin-bo, HUANG Jun, ZHAO Tong-bin, TAO Gang, MA Hong-ling, WANG Wei. A review of the application of artificial intelligence in underground engineering for compressed air energy storage [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2026, 47(2): 413-425.
[6] CAO Xiao-yong, LIU Rui-hui, LI Jian-fei, YE Xin-xin, GENG Jun-yang, TAN Hai-xing. Sealing system design and model testing of lining structures for artificial underground gas storage caverns in medium-hard rock strata [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2026, 47(2): 426-436.
[7] CHENG Hao-de, JIA Ning, LIU Shun, NIE Hui-jian, LIANG Hao. Calculation method of heat transfer in multi-layer sealing structure of artificial caverns for compressed air energy storage [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2026, 47(2): 470-484.
[8] SUN Guan-hua, WANG Zhang-xing, WANG Jiao, DONG Yi-Xin, SHI Lu, LIU Zhi-jun, LIN Shan. FDEM-based collaborative optimization of sealing structure and lining preset joint design in underground lined rock caverns [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2026, 47(2): 497-514.
[9] ZHANG Guo-hua, GUO Hui, ZHANG Shi-shu, ZHOU Zhi-yi, XIANG Yue, XIONG Feng, HUA Dong-jie. Method for determining the optimal axial ratio of elliptical section and operating pressure range in CAES underground gas storage facility [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2026, 47(2): 515-529.
[10] CAO Xiao-yong, GUAN Shao-yu, YE Xin-xin. Stability analysis method for underground lined storage cavern group in compressed air energy storage power station [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2026, 47(2): 530-538.
[11] LIU Shun, CHENG Hao-de, JIA Ning, WANG Hong-bo, YIN Hong-lei. Bernoulli temperature control scheme for compressed air energy storage tunnel-type underground lined cavern [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2026, 47(2): 539-548.
[12] HU Gang, RUI Rui, JIANG Qiang-qiang, WANG Yong-ping, ZHANG Wen-tao. Fracture initiation angle and pressure in tunnel-excavated hard rock caverns for compressed air energy storage: a 2D numerical analysis [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2026, 47(2): 549-561.
[13] XIE Chuan-jin, LUO Hong-mei, BAI Bing, LI Ji-yan, YANG Heng-tao, ZHENG Wen-zhao. Evaluation of the sealing performance of compressed air energy storage spaces in aquifers: theory and applications [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2026, 47(2): 562-570.
[14] WANG Zhi-liang1, XIAO Zhi-huan1, SHEN Lin-fang1, LI Shao-Jun2. Coupling mechanism of seepage and heat transfer in rock fracture based on physics-informed neural networks [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2026, 47(2): 703-716.
[15] LI Bin, SHEN Hai-meng, LI Qi, LI Xia-ying, . A numerical simulation of dynamic evolution of permeability during granite shear process under different confining pressures [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(S1): 437-453.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!