Rock and Soil Mechanics ›› 2026, Vol. 47 ›› Issue (2): 515-529.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2025.0821

• Special Topic on Underground Engineering of Compressed Air Energy Storage • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Method for determining the optimal axial ratio of elliptical section and operating pressure range in CAES underground gas storage facility

ZHANG Guo-hua1, 2, GUO Hui2, ZHANG Shi-shu3, ZHOU Zhi-yi4, XIANG Yue1, XIONG Feng4, HUA Dong-jie4   

  1. 1. State Key Laboratory of Deep Geothermal Resources, School of Sustainable Energy, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan, Hubei 430074, China; 2. Advanced Technology Research Institute, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan, Hubei 430074, China; 3. Power China Chengdu Engineering Corporation Limited, Chengdu, Sichuan 610072, China; 4. Faculty of Engineering, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan, Hubei 430074, China
  • Received:2025-07-31 Accepted:2025-12-24 Online:2026-02-10 Published:2026-02-04
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (U24A20599).

Abstract: The cross-sectional shape of an underground gas storage in a compressed air energy storage (CAES) power plant significantly influences its stress state, thereby affecting gas tightness and stability. It is conventionally considered that a circular cross-section yields the most favorable stress distribution. However, under anisotropic in-situ stress conditions, the hoop stress around a circular cavern is uneven and can induce localized lining cracking and gas leakage. To address this issue, this study investigates elliptical cross-section storage caverns using theoretical analysis based on elasticity theory. First, we propose a gas-tightness criterion based on the elastic stress state and derive an analytical solution for the elliptical cross-section’s optimal axial ratio. Second, we establish a stability criterion for lined rock caverns under anisotropic in-situ stress and develop a method to determine the operating pressure range for elliptical cross-sections, comparing it with the circular cross-section. Furthermore, we perform a parameter sensitivity analysis using FLAC3D to evaluate how factors affect the elliptical cross-section’s optimal axial ratio and operating pressure range. Finally, we establish an integrated calculation process to determine the optimal axial ratio and pressure range. Results show that, under anisotropic in-situ stress conditions, an elliptical cross-section designed with an optimal axial ratio can produce uniform hoop stress around the cavern. When an elliptical cross- section gas storage facility is designed with the optimal axis ratio, its pressure operating range is maximized. The lateral pressure coefficient, in-situ stress and internal pressure of gas storage are the main factors affecting the operating pressure range of elliptical section gas storage. These findings provide theoretical guidance for the shape optimization and pressure design of underground gas storage caverns.

Key words: compressed air energy storage, gas storage cavern, elliptical section, optimal axial ratio, operating pressure range

CLC Number: 

  • TU93
[1] XIE Chuan-jin, LUO Hong-mei, BAI Bing, LI Ji-yan, YANG Heng-tao, ZHENG Wen-zhao. Evaluation of the sealing performance of compressed air energy storage spaces in aquifers: theory and applications [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2026, 47(2): 562-570.
[2] HU Gang, RUI Rui, JIANG Qiang-qiang, WANG Yong-ping, ZHANG Wen-tao. Fracture initiation angle and pressure in tunnel-excavated hard rock caverns for compressed air energy storage: a 2D numerical analysis [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2026, 47(2): 549-561.
[3] LIU Shun, CHENG Hao-de, JIA Ning, WANG Hong-bo, YIN Hong-lei. Bernoulli temperature control scheme for compressed air energy storage tunnel-type underground lined cavern [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2026, 47(2): 539-548.
[4] CAO Xiao-yong, GUAN Shao-yu, YE Xin-xin. Stability analysis method for underground lined storage cavern group in compressed air energy storage power station [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2026, 47(2): 530-538.
[5] SUN Guan-hua, WANG Zhang-xing, WANG Jiao, DONG Yi-Xin, SHI Lu, LIU Zhi-jun, LIN Shan. FDEM-based collaborative optimization of sealing structure and lining preset joint design in underground lined rock caverns [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2026, 47(2): 497-514.
[6] ZHANG Gui-min, SUN Wen-qing, ZHU Ze-fan, SU Yong-kang, ZHU Xu-cong. Influence of construction gap on the force of steel lining in compressed air storage cavern [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2026, 47(2): 485-496.
[7] CHENG Hao-de, JIA Ning, LIU Shun, NIE Hui-jian, LIANG Hao. Calculation method of heat transfer in multi-layer sealing structure of artificial caverns for compressed air energy storage [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2026, 47(2): 470-484.
[8] CAO Xiao-yong, LIU Rui-hui, LI Jian-fei, YE Xin-xin, GENG Jun-yang, TAN Hai-xing. Sealing system design and model testing of lining structures for artificial underground gas storage caverns in medium-hard rock strata [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2026, 47(2): 426-436.
[9] GE Xin-bo, HUANG Jun, ZHAO Tong-bin, TAO Gang, MA Hong-ling, WANG Wei. A review of the application of artificial intelligence in underground engineering for compressed air energy storage [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2026, 47(2): 413-425.
[10] TAN Yun-zhi, GUO Jin-hui, WU Ke-yu, MING Hua-jun, WANG Chong, WU Jun. Development and experimental verification of constant stiffness swelling apparatus [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2026, 47(2): 402-412.
[11] ZHANG Guo-hua, XIANG Yue, ZHANG Shi-shu, WANG Xin-jin, GUO Hui, XIONG Feng, HUA Dong-jie. Analysis of elastic-plastic deformation of surrounding rock mass throughout the whole operation process of the compressed air energy storage caverns [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2026, 47(2): 383-401.
[12] WONG Tsun-ming, ZHAO Xiang-yang, MA Hong-ling, WANG Lei, ZHANG Jia-min. Feasibility analysis of the comprehensive utilization of coupling salt cavern CAES and insoluble sediment thermal storage [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2026, 47(2): 373-382.
[13] SUN Guan-hua, GENG Xuan, JIANG Chang-fei, SHI Lu, ZHANG Jin-tao, JIANG Wei. Analytical model and evolution law of the surrounding rock failure zone in lined rock caverns for compressed air energy storage power stations [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2026, 47(2): 359-372.
[14] FU Qiang, YANG Ke, LIU Qin-jie, SONG Tao-tao, WU Ben-niu, YU Peng, . Interface strength characteristics of surrounding rock-lining composite structures under cyclic loading [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(S1): 40-52.
[15] ZHAO Kai, MA Hong-ling, SHI Xi-lin, LI Yin-ping, YANG Chun-he, . Long-term stability assessment of salt caverns for compressed air energy storage based on creep-fatigue constitutive model [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(S1): 1-12.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!