Rock and Soil Mechanics ›› 2026, Vol. 47 ›› Issue (4): 1147-1159.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2025.0375

• Fundamental Theory and Experimental Research • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Dynamic response characteristics of helical anchor piles under cyclic loading

ZHANG Xin1, ZHANG Ru-meng1, LIU Chen1, 2, LIU Si-yu1, GUO Bo-wen1   

  1. 1.College of Geosciences and Engineering, North China University of Water Resources and Electric Power, Zhengzhou, Henan 450046,China; 2.PowerChina Henan Electric Power Survey & Design Institute Co., Ltd., Zhengzhou, Henan 450007, China)
  • Received:2025-04-10 Accepted:2025-06-23 Online:2026-04-13 Published:2026-04-14
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Key R & D Program (2019YFC1509704) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (U1704243).

Abstract: Using a self-developed cyclic loading system, the model tests were conducted to investigate the bearing performance of helical anchor piles under horizontal cyclic loading and the influencing factors of soil deformation. Combined with the particle image velocimetry (PIV) technology, the deformation field of the soil around the pile was analyzed, revealing the deformation mechanisms of the surrounding soil under different influencing factors. The results show that: (1) The amplitude and frequency of cyclic loading significantly influence the bearing behavior of helical anchor piles under cyclic loading. Compared to the original static loading scenario, the bearing performance of anchor piles in dense sand exhibits a decreasing trend when subjected to static loading after cyclic loading. (2) The hysteresis loop evolves from an open to a progressively closed shape, with a clear positive offset in the overall response. Under the same cyclic period, the hysteresis loop area increases with amplitude and decreases with frequency. (3) A predictive model for horizontal cyclic cumulative displacement of anchor piles was proposed based on the law of horizontal cumulative displacement, demonstrating satisfactory predictive performance. (4) The embedment ratio, relative density, amplitude, frequency and period of cyclic load have important effects on soil deformation around the pile. The passive displacement field in front of the pile is most sensitive to the loading amplitude, while sand displacement behind the pile is more sensitive to relative density. The shear field in sand is usually parallel and symmetrical with the axis of anchor pile, and the shear strength is positively correlated with the amplitude and frequency of cyclic load, and negatively correlated with the frequency of cyclic load.

Key words: horizontal cyclic loading, helical anchor pile, model test, particle image velocimetry technology

CLC Number: 

  • TU 470
[1] PAN Hong, HUANG Cai-mu, LUO Guan-yong, PENG Si-ge, LIU Rong-zhao, CAO Hong. Experimental study on outburst failure behavior and pore pressure response characteristics of water-rich composite sand layers [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2026, 47(4): 1171-1182.
[2] LIU Hong-shuai, DING Bo-wen, SONG Dong-song, LI Yi, WANG Yong-zhi. Analysis of boundary effects of flexible laminated shear box on dry sand site centrifuge tests [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2026, 47(4): 1219-1228.
[3] YANG Jun-peng, DUAN Xiao-pei, ZHANG Qian, LI Bo-wen, WANG Yi-min. Experimental study on drainage performance of reinforced improved soft rock residual soil under rainfall conditions [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2026, 47(3): 882-892.
[4] CAO Xiao-yong, LIU Rui-hui, LI Jian-fei, YE Xin-xin, GENG Jun-yang, TAN Hai-xing. Sealing system design and model testing of lining structures for artificial underground gas storage caverns in medium-hard rock strata [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2026, 47(2): 426-436.
[5] CHEN Shu-li, GUO Wei, REN Yu-xiao, CHEN Wei. Experimental study of stability of interlocking L-shaped caisson on soft soil interlayer ground [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2026, 47(1): 49-60.
[6] WU Jin-biao, ZENG Liu-qi, JIANG Yi-hui, HUAI Rong-guo, ZENG Cheng. Uplift resistance of shallow-buried pipes in unsaturated sand under different saturation levels [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2026, 47(1): 209-218.
[7] JIA Bao-xin, YUAN Qing-lei. Correction of tunnel seepage field and the minimum overburden thickness under the influence of grouting [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2026, 47(1): 255-266.
[8] LAI Zhi-qiang, BAI Sheng-yuan, CHEN Lin, ZOU Wei-lie, XU Shu-ling, ZHAO Lian-jun, . Experimental study of dewatering characteristics of ring-type tube stockyard sludge storage [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(9): 2805-2815.
[9] HUANG Da-wei, LU Wen-jian, LUO Wen-jun, YU Jue, . An experimental study on the influence of synchronous grouting during shield tunnel construction on vertical displacement and surrounding earth pressure in sandy soil [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(9): 2837-2846.
[10] SONG Wei-tao, ZHANG Pei, DU Xiu-li, LIN Qing-tao, . Influence of soil property on ground response during construction of shallow shield tunnel [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(7): 2179-2188.
[11] YANG Bai, QIN Chao, ZHANG Yin-hai, WANG Wei, XIAO Shi-guo, . Model tests on bearing characteristics of pile with high rock-socketed ratio above an underlying karst cave [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(6): 1839-1850.
[12] SHI Zhan, ZHANG Tie-jun, LI Mei-xiang, TAO Si-ji, BO Yin, LI Yun-bo, . Model test of horizontal freezing reinforcement in mud tank of slurry balanced shield [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(5): 1534-1544.
[13] CHAI Hong-tao, WEN Song-lin, . Centrifugal model test on characteristics of pile foundation bearing capacity failure envelope curve under combined loading [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(5): 1556-1562.
[14] REN Yi-qing, CHEN Bao-guo, REN Guo-qing, YANG Zhen-zhong, XU Fang. Stress characteristics of high-fill box culvert with soft layers placed on the top and sidewall during construction [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(4): 1153-1162.
[15] PEI Yuan-yuan, LONG Jian-hui, GUO Shi-yi, AN Cheng-ji, WENG Hang-yu, ZHANG Ji-ning, . Model test study on stress-strain characteristics of angled reinforced soil retaining wall under different loads [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(2): 539-550.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!