Rock and Soil Mechanics ›› 2021, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (4): 954-962.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2020.1191

• Fundamental Theroy and Experimental Research • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Study of single and two-layer geogrid reinforced ballasted trackbed using pull-out test and discrete element method

CHEN Cheng, DUAN Yong-da, RUI Rui, WANG Lun   

  1. School of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Wuhan University of Technology, Wuhan, Hubei 430070, China
  • Received:2020-08-12 Revised:2020-10-13 Online:2021-04-12 Published:2021-04-25
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51708438) and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (2018IVB029).

Abstract: Geogrid is used to reinforce the trackbed by increasing the confining pressure and reducing the vertical cumulative settlement and lateral displacement of ballast. In order to further study the reinforcement mechanism of geogrid reinforced ballast, pull-out tests of single and double-layer geogrids with large and small apertures under static load were carried out by using self-designed equipment, and the influences of grid aperture, reinforcement depth and number of layers on pull-out resistance were analyzed. The standard values of pull-out resistance at different depths were obtained by single-layer tests, and the coefficient of double-layer reinforcement was proposed to quantify the reinforcement capacity of double-layer geogrids, and the best laying way was also discussed. Double-layer geogrids with aperture size of 65 mm placed in 200-300 mm were simulated by DEM. The distribution of internal stress chain and contact force vector of geogrid reinforced ballast during pull-out process were analyzed from the micro view. The results show that, for the graded ballast, the geogrid with 65 mm aperture performed better than that with 32 mm aperture; the ultimate pullout resistance of double-layer laying was greater than the sum of the standard values of the two-layer laying. The double-layer reinforcement effect is related to the geogrid aperture and the layer spacing. The simulation results also verified the superposition of reinforcement effect between the two-layer geogrids during pull-out process, and the distribution of normal contact force vector showed that the double-layer geogrid had interlocking reinforcement effect.

Key words: ballast, geogrid, pull-out test, double-layer reinforcement, reinforcement effect coefficient, DEM

CLC Number: 

  • TU 443
[1] SUN Hong-lin, LI Wei, WANG Ying-he, HUANG Guo-liang, LIAO Xin, HUANG Liang, . Causes and countermeasures for ballastless track subgrade upheaval of high-speed railway [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(S1): 389-402.
[2] MA Bin, WANG Li-yan, JI Wen-wei, WU Han, CAI Xiao-guang, WANG Bin-hui, . Experimental study of seismic performances of geogrid-wrapped tire-faced retaining soil walls under strong earthquakes [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(9): 2792-2804.
[3] WANG Jia-quan, WU Xin-biao, DONG Cheng-feng, ZHANG Tao-yi, . Direct shear tests on sand-contaminated ballast based on SmartRock sensing technology [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(4): 1060-1070.
[4] YANG Yan-shuang, YAN Lei, ZHANG Zhan-rong, LIU Yong-li, CUI Zhen, PENG Jian-cheng, KANG Zhao-peng, . Ground motion propagation characteristics based on three-phase porous medium model [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(4): 1109-1121.
[5] SONG Xiang-hua, XIAO Heng-lin, NI Hua-yong, TAN Yong, . Macro and micro study on the failure triggering mechanism of sandy soil slopes due to rainfall [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(3): 969-979.
[6] JIN Lei, LI Jing-jing, LI Xin-ming, SUN Han-qing, . Finite difference method-discrete element method simulation of flexible boundary conditions and their influence on the drained and undrained triaxial shear behavior of sands [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(3): 980-990.
[7] CHANG Jian-mei, TIAN Shi-long, LI Xiang, FENG Huai-ping, KUVANDIK Lesov, . Dynamic shear performance and meso-effect of railway ballast improved with tire-derived aggregate of different shapes [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(3): 721-728.
[8] XIE He-lin, HU Zheng, YI Fei, . Suffusion modeling of poorly graded sand and gravel soil considering particle morphology and clogging effect [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2024, 45(S1): 677-684.
[9] YANG Jia-qiang, ZHU Yu-long, XI Bang-lu, ZHANG Zhen-hua, . Prediction of cumulative plastic deformation for fouled ballast under different moisture contents [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2024, 45(S1): 715-722.
[10] ZHAO Yang, LU Zheng, YAN Ting-zhou, LI Jian, TANG Chu-xuan, QIU Yu, YAO Hai-lin, . Vibration compaction behaviors and prestressing effect of geocell-reinforced subgrade [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2024, 45(S1): 771-782.
[11] JIANG Ming-jie, LI Ze-yi, JI En-yue, LIU Yu-bo, MEI Guo-xiong, . Experimental study on optimal grid size of coarse-grained soil-grid considering the effect of gradation [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2024, 45(9): 2565-2572.
[12] XU Wen-hao, WANG Zhi-hua, SHEN Zhi-fu, GAO Hong-mei, LIU Yin-qiang, ZHANG Xin-lei, . Simulation of saturated sand site liquefaction based on the CFD-DEM method [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2024, 45(8): 2492-2501.
[13] JI Hui, PENG Yu, WU Ze-xiang, TU Dong-mei, . Numerical simulation of the uplift capacity of suction caisson foundation in sandy soil: effects of mooring depth [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2024, 45(7): 2187-2194.
[14] ZHANG Jie, NIE Ru-song, HUANG Mao-tong, TAN Yong-chang, LI Ya-feng, . Analysis of ballast penetration phenomenon in ballast track under dynamic loads: experimental testing and DEM modeling [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2024, 45(6): 1720-1730.
[15] JIANG Ming-jing, ZHANG Lu-feng, HAN Liang, JIANG Peng-ming, . Damage law of structured sand using symbolic regression algorithm [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2024, 45(12): 3768-3778.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!