Rock and Soil Mechanics ›› 2021, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (10): 2865-2874.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2021.0352

• Numerical Analysis • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Numerical analysis on dynamic response characteristics of geosynthetic reinforced embankment under moving load

ZHANG Ling1, 2, OU Qiang1, 2, 3, 4, ZHAO Ming-hua1, 2, DING Xuan-ming3, 4, LIU Jian-fei5   

  1. 1. College of Civil Engineering, Hunan University, Changsha, Hunan 410082, China; 2. Key Laboratory of Building Safety and Energy Efficiency of the Ministry of Education, Hunan University, Changsha, Hunan 410082, China; 3. College of Civil Engineering, Chongqing University, Chongqing 400045, China; 4. Key Laboratory of New Technology for Construction of Cities in Mountain Area, Chongqing University, Chongqing 400045, China; 5. China United Engineering Corporation Limited, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310052, China
  • Received:2021-03-10 Revised:2021-06-24 Online:2021-10-11 Published:2021-10-21
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (52078205, 52108299), the Natural Science Foundation of Hunan Province, China (2020JJ3013) and the China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (2021M693740).

Abstract: The dynamic response of geosynthetic reinforced embankment under traffic moving load has attracted increasing attentions in engineering field. A 3D model of geosynthetic reinforced embankment was established by using the ABAQUS finite element software in this paper, which was used to analyze the dynamic stress and deformation of geosynthetic reinforced embankment under moving load. The traffic load was simulated by two moving rectangular plane loads. Fortran subroutine was developed to control the amplitude, range, and speed of the moving load. The equivalent linear viscoelastic model was developed to simulate embankment fill to reflect the viscoelasticity of embankment fill. The geogrid was simulated by T3D2 truss element. The infinite element was used to reduce the boundary effect caused by model size at the boundary. The numerical model of geosynthetic reinforced embankment under moving load was established without considering drainage consolidation. Based on the results of the existing literatures and the results of this paper, the cross-section deformations of the geosynthetic reinforced embankment and the stress at the embankment top surface were compared and verified. The dynamic stress distribution in the longitudinal section and transverse section and the vertical dynamic stress distribution characteristics of the geosynthetic reinforced embankment under moving load were also analyzed. The results showed that the dynamic stress and deformation decayed rapidly within the range of 1.0 m on the embankment top surface and gradually transitioned to an equivalent uniform load with small amplitude. At the same depth, the attenuation coefficient of dynamic stress under the wheel load was the smallest, followed by that at the center of double wheel loads, and the attenuation coefficient at the outer edge of the wheel load was the largest.

Key words: moving load, geosynthetics, reinforced embankment, finite element, dynamic response

CLC Number: 

  • TU 47
[1] NIE Yao-wu, HU Bing, GU Lei-yu, LI Bin, ZHOU Quan-chao, LI Wen-hui, LI Qi, LI Xia-ying, . Numerical simulation on safety risk assessment of coal mining with CO2 geological storage [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(S1): 491-506.
[2] ZHANG Xian-cheng, CHI Bao-tao, YU Xian-ze, GUO Qian-jian, YUAN Wei, ZHANG Yao-ming, . Unstructured mesh generation and fracture damage analysis in the implementation of peridynamics-based finite element method [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(S1): 467-476.
[3] ZHANG Chi, DENG Long-chuan, ZHUANG Qian-wei, LI Xiao-zhao, WANG Qiu-ping, QIAO Liang, . Experimental and numerical investigations on rotary rock-breaking force and efficiency of disc cutter [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(9): 2995-3006.
[4] CHEN Deng-hong, ZHANG Xin-han, LIU Yun-hui, HU Hao-wen, LIU Yun-long, LIANG Yu-xiang, . Nonlinear seismic response analysis of high arch dam-irregular foundation- reservoir water system based on octree scaled boundary finite element method [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(8): 2586-2599.
[5] KE Wen-hai, YANG Wen-hai, LI Yuan, WU Lei, . Dynamic response of pile foundation in slope topography under SH wave [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(5): 1545-1544.
[6] YANG Ming-hui, CAI Ming-hui, CHEN Bo, YANG Han, . A method for calculating horizontal impedance of a single pile considering wave-induced seabed dynamic response [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(5): 1563-1572.
[7] ZHOU Peng-fa, SHEN Yu-sheng, GAO Deng, ZHANG Xi, HUANG Hai-feng, GAO Bo, . Explicit time-domain perfectly matched layers base on mixed finite element method [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(5): 1605-1619.
[8] ZHOU Bo-han, ZHANG Wen-li, WANG Dong, . Numerical study of ball penetrometer for predicting strength of overconsolidated soils [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(4): 1303-1309.
[9] WU Xiao-tian, YAO Yang-ping, WEI Ran, CUI Wen-jie. Numerical simulation of soil deformation induced by tunnel construction with unified hardening model [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(3): 1013-1024.
[10] LIU Wen-jing, DENG Hui, ZHOU Xin. Dynamic response of high steep rock slope with a double-layer ductile shear zone under earthquake action [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(11): 3534-3548.
[11] SHAO Guo-jian, MAO Ze-hui, SU Yu-chen, JIAO Hong-cheng, LYU Ya-ru. Investigation into transmission coefficient of calcareous sand: waveform coupling effects and gradient boosting prediction method [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(11): 3661-3672.
[12] HE Ying, CHEN Ya, YIN Ben-chi, LIU Zhong-xian, LIU Xu, . Multi-point ground motion simulation at mountain-valley coupled sites using frequency-dependent equivalent linearization method [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(10): 3280-3288.
[13] ZHANG Jin, LI Shu-heng, ZHU Qi-zhi, SHI Ling-ling, SHAO Jian-fu, . Short- and long-term rock constitutive model and gray sandstone deformation prediction based on deep learning method [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(1): 289-302.
[14] HAN Li-bing, LI Wen-tao, WEI Chang-fu, . Application of adaptive time step method to unsaturated seepage flow [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2024, 45(S1): 685-693.
[15] DAI Bei-bing, YUAN Xin, ZHOU Xi-wen, LIU Feng-tao, . Upper bound limit analysis using smoothed finite element method considering discontinuous velocity field [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2024, 45(9): 2849-2858.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!