Rock and Soil Mechanics ›› 2023, Vol. 44 ›› Issue (8): 2381-2388.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2022.1374

• Fundamental Theroy and Experimental Research • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Analytical solution of anisotropic seepage in dam foundation with anti-seepage walls at both ends

YU Jun, LI Dong-kai, HE Zhen, ZHANG Zhi-zhong   

  1. School of Civil Engineering, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan 410075, China
  • Received:2022-09-05 Accepted:2022-11-13 Online:2023-08-21 Published:2023-08-21
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (52078496).

Abstract: Since two or more anti-seepage walls are usually required in the present design of dam foundation, the anisotropic steady-state seepage of dam foundation with anti-seepage walls at both ends is analytically studied in this paper. The soil is divided into four regular regions, the anisotropic soil layer is converted into the equivalent isotropic soil layer by coordinate transformation, and the water head distribution in the four regions is expressed as a series solution by using the separation variable method. The explicit analytical solution of the anisotropic seepage field of the dam foundation with anti-seepage walls at both ends is obtained by combining the continuity conditions between regions. The analytical solution in this paper is reduced to the seepage flow under isotropic conditions, the uplift pressure at the dam bottom, the analytical solution and numerical results of conformal transformation are compared. The head value under anisotropic conditions is compared with the calculation results of the finite element software. The results are in good agreement, which verifies the correctness of the analytical solution in this paper, and the analytic solution has a higher accuracy than the analytical solution of conformal transformation. Finally, a parametric analysis of the seepage field at the base of the dam shows that soil anisotropy has a non-negligible effect on seepage at the base of the dam, and that, all other things being equal, the seepage volume and outlet hydraulic gradient of a soil with a larger ratio of vertical to horizontal permeability coefficient will be smaller than those of a soil with a smaller ratio of vertical to horizontal permeability coefficient; the maximum lift pressure of a soil with a larger ratio of vertical to horizontal permeability coefficient will be larger than that of a soil with a smaller ratio of vertical to horizontal permeability coefficient.

Key words: dam base, anti-seepage wall, two-dimensional steady seepage, permeability anisotropy, explicit analytical solution, uplift pressure, seepage flow, outlet hydraulic gradient

CLC Number: 

  • TV 223
[1] REN Wang, MIAO Jun, LEI Wan-jun, WANG Luo, CHEN Yi-feng, . Numerical modeling and design optimization of a 3D cross-connected drain system in a concrete dam foundation [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(7): 2281-2295.
[2] GAN Lei, LIU Yu, ZHANG Zong-liang, SHEN Zhen-zhong, MA Hong-ying, . Roughness characterization of rock fracture and its influence on fracture seepage characteristics [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2023, 44(6): 1585-1592.
[3] YU Jun, ZHANG Zhi-zhong, ZHENG Jing-fan, HE Zhen. Analytical solution of pore pressure in seepage field of foundation pit with a sealed bottom under water level fluctuation [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2023, 44(12): 3415-3423.
[4] XU Jie, ZHOU Jian, LUO Ling-hui, YU Liang-gui, . Study on anisotropic permeability model for mixed kaolin-montmorillonite clays [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(2): 469-476.
[5] WANG Ming-yu, LIU Qing-zhe, QU Ci-xiao, LI Jin-zhu, . Experimental investigation on the seepage flow through a single fracture in rocks based on the disc fracture model [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(11): 3523-3530.
[6] CHEN Xing-zhang, CHEN Hui, YOU Yong, LIU Jin-feng,. Experiment on distribution and influence factors of uplift pressure acting on bottom of debris flow check dam [J]. , 2018, 39(9): 3229-3236.
[7] LI Wei, XU Qiang, WU Li-zhou, LI Si-qi, . Influence of seepage forms of confined water on translational landslide [J]. , 2018, 39(4): 1401-1410.
[8] TANG Ran, XU Qiang, WU Bing, FAN Xuan-mei,. Method of sliding distance calculation for translational landslides [J]. , 2018, 39(3): 1009-1019.
[9] HU Zhi-feng, CHEN Jian, QIU Yue-feng, LI Jian-bin, ZHOU Xing-tao, . Analytical formula for ground settlement induced by horizontal movement of retaining wall [J]. , 2018, 39(11): 4165-4175.
[10] WANG Yin, AI Jun, YANG Qing,. A CFD-DEM coupled method incorporating soil inter-particle rolling resistance [J]. , 2017, 38(6): 1771-1780.
[11] YE Zu-yang, JIANG Qing-hui, LIU Yan-zhang, CHENG Ai-ping, . Numerical analysis of unsaturated seepage flow in discrete fracture networks of rock [J]. , 2017, 38(11): 3332-3340.
[12] ZHOU Ya-feng, SU Kai, WU He-gao. Study of external water pressure estimation method for reinforced concrete lining of hydraulic tunnels [J]. , 2014, 35(S2): 198-203.
[13] LIU Jie, LI Jian-lin, HU Jing, CAI Jian, ZHAO Zong-yong. Comparative analysis of multiple factors affecting seepage flow of splitting sandstone with fillers or non-fillers [J]. , 2014, 35(8): 2163-2170.
[14] YANG Shun ,OU Guo-qiang ,WANG Jun ,LU Gui-hong ,YU Yan ,PAN Hua-li,. Experimental analysis of scouring of debris flow initiation process under steady seepage condition [J]. , 2014, 35(12): 3489-3495.
[15] SHEN Yin-bin ,ZHU Da-yong ,JIANG Ze-feng ,YAO Ha-yan , . Critical slip field of slope in process of rainfall infiltration [J]. , 2013, 34(S1): 60-66.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!