Rock and Soil Mechanics ›› 2024, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (2): 489-501.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2023.0241

• Fundamental Theroy and Experimental Research • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Large-scale shaking table test on the seismic response of dip and anti-dip layered fractured structural slopes

WANG Tong1, 2, LIU Xian-feng1, 2, 3, YUAN Sheng-yang1, 2, JIANG Guan-lu1, 2, HU Jin-shan4, SHAO Zhu-jie4, TIAN Shi-jun4   

  1. 1. School of Civil Engineering, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu, Sichuan 610031, China; 2. Key Laboratory of High-speed Railway Engineering of Ministry of Education, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu, Sichuan 610031, China; 3. School of Civil Engineering, Xinjiang Institute of Engineering, Urumqi, Xinjiang 830023, China; 4. China Railway First Survey and Design Institute Group Co., Ltd., Xi’an, Shaanxi 710043, China
  • Received:2023-02-27 Accepted:2023-04-23 Online:2024-02-11 Published:2024-02-07
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the Scientific Research Project of China Railway First Survey and Design Institute Group Co., Ltd. (20-06).

Abstract: In the challenging and perilous mountainous regions of Southwest China, there are numerous layered and fractured rock slopes with varying inclinations. These slopes are prone to disasters such as collapses and landslides during earthquakes, posing a serious threat to the ongoing construction of the Sichuan-Xizang Railway. To address this issue, large-scale shaking table model tests were conducted to study the dynamic response, failure modes of instability, and energy transfer characteristics of dip and anti-dip layered slopes under strong earthquake conditions. The test results reveal that the anti-seismic performance of anti-dip slopes is significantly better than that of dip slopes. The failure mode of dip slopes primarily involves tensile cracking, shearing, uplift, and slip failure. On the other hand, the failure mode of anti-dip slopes mainly consists of tensile, bending, tilting, and collapsing failure. The natural vibration frequency of anti-dip slopes is higher compared to dip slopes. As the earthquake magnitude increases, the natural frequency of dip slopes gradually decreases. However, the natural frequency of anti-dip slopes exhibits repeated oscillations within the range of seismic amplitudes of from 0.4g to 0.7g. Dip slopes exhibit clear “elevation amplification effect” and “tend-surface effect,” while anti-dip slopes demonstrate the “elevation amplification effect.” Furthermore, the internal acceleration response is greater than that of the slope surface. Marginal spectrum identification indicates that the most significant change in peak of marginal spectrum amplitude (PMSA) for dip slopes occurs at the upper part of the slope waist. This suggests that the energy loss of seismic waves near this position is the largest, indicating the formation of a sliding failure surface near the upper part of the slope waist. For anti-dip slopes, the PMSA decreases most significantly at the slope shoulder, indicating severe damage and a propensity for local collapse in this area. The analysis results are in good agreement with the experimental observations, providing further insights into the dynamic response and instability failure modes of different structural types of layered slopes under strong earthquakes. These findings serve as a basis for ensuring the safe construction of the Sichuan-Xizang Railway.

Key words: dip slope, anti-dip slope, shaking table test, peak ground acceleration (PGA) amplification coefficient, failure mode, damage identification

CLC Number: 

  • TU45
[1] TAO Zhi-gang, LI Meng-nan, YU Hai-jun, FAN Fang-zheng, WANG Jiong, . Experimental study on the anchoring characteristics of 2G-NPR anchor rods under different anchoring apertures [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(S1): 67-80.
[2] SONG Li-qi, ZHANG Min, XU Xiao, SUN Jing-wen, YU Kui, LI Xin-yao, . Inversion analysis of shield tunnel considering the rotation effect of segment joint based on distributed fiber optic sensing [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(8): 2483-2494.
[3] CHU Chao-qun, BAO Xing-jia, MAO Ming-fa, WU Shun-chuan, CUI He-jia, . Experimental study of acoustic emission characteristics and failure forms of deep-buried limestone under triaxial compression [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(7): 2049-2061.
[4] LIU Jian, XIA Yong, JIANG Quan, CHEN Tao, HE Wei-guo, FAN Guo-gang, XIONG Xian-tao, ZHENG Hong, . Surrounding rock deformation and failure characteristics of Yingliangbao hydropower station in highly tectonic region and response analysis to Luding earthquake in underground caverns [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(7): 2265-2280.
[5] LIU Hong-shuai, YANG Jian-sheng, SONG Dong-song, SUN Qiang-qiang, . Centrifuge modeling on ground response of dry sand site under near-fault pulsed and non-pulsed ground motions [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(5): 1429-1441.
[6] WANG Xin, XING An-kang, ZENG Zi-qiang, JIANG Yi, XU Jian-yu, WANG Xiao-nan, LIU Zao-bao, . Experiment of shear mechanical properties of layered iron ore [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(4): 1039-1048.
[7] DONG Jian-hua, YANG Bo, TIAN Wen-tong, WU Xiao-lei, HE Peng-fei, ZHAO Lü-hua, LIAN Bo, . Research and development of novel anti-slide pile to prevent liquefaction and shaking table model test of seismic response [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(4): 1084-1094.
[8] ZHOU Wen-qiang, JIANG Liang-wei, LUO Qiang, XIAO Zhuo-qi, LUO Yi-lian, WEI Ming, . Shaking table test on seismic performance of anchoring frame beam with flexible external anchor heads [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(4): 1163-1173.
[9] WANG Ying, LIU Jia-yi, GAO Meng, KONG Xiang-xiao, . Experiment on dynamic characteristics of deep-sea gas-bearing energy soil under seismic loading [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(2): 457-466.
[10] CAI Xiao-guang, XU Hong-lu, WANG Hai-yun, LI Si-han, LI Ying, . Horizontal seismic coefficient of geogrid reinforced soil retaining wall [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(10): 3033-3044.
[11] DENG Dong-ping, XU Run-dong, PENG Yi-hang, WEN Sha-sha. Limit equilibrium method based on mode of slip surface stress analysis for slope stability under the characteristics of spatial heterogeneity and anisotropy in soil strength [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(1): 55-72.
[12] ZHANG Zhen-bo, LI Bing-xin, YANG Qian, LIU Zhi-chun, LIU Yi, . Instability mode of limited soil in adjacent foundation pit engineering [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(1): 266-277.
[13] YANG Yao-hui, XIN Gong-feng, CHEN Yu-min, LI Zhao-feng, . Shaking table test on drainage pile-net composite foundation treated liquefiable subgrade [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2024, 45(S1): 178-186.
[14] FAN Hao, WANG Lei, LUO Yong, ZHU Chuan-qi, . Experimental study on triaxial creep characteristics of unloading-damaged sandstone under step loading [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2024, 45(S1): 277-288.
[15] GAO Dang, PENG Jun, WANG Hang-long, WANG Lin-fei, PENG Kun, . Mechanical characterization of sandstone with bedding under true triaxial conditions [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2024, 45(S1): 349-358.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!