Rock and Soil Mechanics ›› 2025, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (S1): 419-436.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2024.0869

• Geotechnical Engineering • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Current applications and future prospects of machine learning in geotechnical engineering

JIANG Xiao-tong1, ZHANG Xi-wen1, LÜ Ying-hui1, LI Ren-jie2, JIANG Hao2   

  1. 1. College of Civil Engineering and Architecture, University of Jinan, Jinan, Shandong 250002, China 2. Shandong Electric Power Engineering Consulting and Design Institute Co., Ltd., Jinan, Shandong 250002, China
  • Received:2024-07-12 Accepted:2024-09-30 Online:2025-08-08 Published:2025-08-28
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the General Program of Natural Science Foundation of Shandong (ZR2023ME070).

Abstract: Under the influence of rapid developments in artificial intelligence, machine learning, as an important component of it, has significantly enhanced the intelligence, informatization, and automation in many scientific research fields. Geotechnical engineering needs to accurately predict and analyze actual engineering, so efficient and accurate processing and analysis of huge data is the key technical requirement. Machine learning is becoming an important driving force for the development of geotechnical engineering because of its advantages in processing huge amounts of data. To fully understand the progress and effectiveness of machine learning in the field of geotechnical engineering, this paper reviews a large number of relevant literature and uses CiteSpace visualization analysis tools to organize them, deeply exploring the current research status and hot issues, and identifying existing challenges and development bottlenecks. Through literature review, it is found that extensive and in-depth research on machine learning has been carried out in the field of geotechnical engineering. However, the development content and research direction of this field show a certain degree of limitation; although new algorithms have injected new vitality into the field of machine learning, the application of the latest algorithm results in geotechnical engineering is not widespread. In view of this, it is urgent to find ways to resolve its limitations and strive to apply the latest achievements to practical engineering to further promote the intelligent level of geotechnical engineering.

Key words: machine learning, geotechnical engineering, intelligent, CiteSpace, visual analytics

CLC Number: 

  • TU43
[1] CAI Qi-hang, DONG Xue-chao, GUO Ming-wei, LU Zheng, XU An, JIANG Fan, . Intelligent prediction of sinking of super-large anchorage caisson foundation based on soil pressure at cutting edges [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(S1): 377-388.
[2] SIMA Jing-song, XU Qiang, DONG Xiu-jun, DENG Bo, HE Qiu-lin, LI Hao-liang, LIU Jie, LEI Wen-quan. Application of improved regional growth algorithm to identification of rock mass discontinuities [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(7): 2253-2264.
[3] ZHANG Yan-bo, ZHOU Hao, LIANG Peng, YAO Xu-long, TAO Zhi-gang, LAI You-bang, . Acoustic emission location method of rock based on time precise picking and intelligent optimization algorithm [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(5): 1643-1656.
[4] ZHEN Jia-jie, LAI Feng-wen, HUANG Ming, LIAO Qing-xiang, LI Shuang, DUAN Yue-qiang. Intelligent geological condition recognition in shield tunneling via time-series clustering and online learning [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(11): 3615-3625.
[5] SONG Er-bo, YAO Yang-ping, NIU Xi-rong, . A real-time method for intelligent compaction quality of fill using peak acceleration [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(10): 3054-3064.
[6] HE Long-ping, YAO Nan, WANG Qi-hu, YE Yi-cheng, LING Ji-suo, . Rock burst intensity grading prediction model based on automatic machine learning [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2024, 45(9): 2839-2848.
[7] LONG Xiao, SUN Rui, ZHENG Tong, . Convolutional neural network-based liquefaction prediction model and interpretability analysis [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2024, 45(9): 2741-2753.
[8] YANG Yang, WEI Yi-tong. A new method of liquefaction probability level evaluation based on classification tree [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2024, 45(7): 2175-2186.
[9] DENG Zhi-xing, XIE Kang, LI Tai-feng, WANG Wu-bin, HAO Zhe-rui, LI Jia-shen, . A novel method for quality control of vibratory compaction in high-speed railway graded aggregates based on the embedded locking point of coarse particles [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2024, 45(6): 1835-1849.
[10] PAN Qiu-jing, WU Hong-tao, ZHANG Zi-long, SONG Ke-zhi, . Prediction of tunneling-induced ground surface settlement within composite strata using multi-physics-informed neural network [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2024, 45(2): 539-551.
[11] JIANG Ming-jing, ZHANG Lu-feng, HAN Liang, JIANG Peng-ming, . Damage law of structured sand using symbolic regression algorithm [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2024, 45(12): 3768-3778.
[12] LIU Tian-xiang, ZHU Hong-hu, WU Bing, LI Hao-jie, HU Le-le, . Progressive failure mechanism of embedded strain sensing cable-frozen soil interface [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2024, 45(1): 131-140.
[13] WU Shuang-shuang, HU Xin-li, SUN Shao-rui, WEI Ji-hong, . A case study of mechanism for intermittent deformation and early warning of landslides [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2023, 44(S1): 593-602.
[14] DONG Xue-chao, GUO Ming-wei, WANG Shui-lin, . Sinking state prediction and optimal sensor placement of super large open caissons based on LightGBM [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2023, 44(6): 1789-1799.
[15] WANG Zu-le, KONG De-qiong, DU Yue-ming, ZHU Bin, . Extension and validation of sequential limit analysis for geotechnical problems [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2023, 44(12): 3531-3540.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!