Rock and Soil Mechanics ›› 2025, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (11): 3562-3573.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2024.1510

• Fundamental Theory and Experimental Research • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Calculation method of sliding surface stress based on segmented sliding surface stress measurement system

CHEN Huai-lin1, YANG Tao1, RAO Yun-kang1, ZHANG Zhe1, WU Hong-gang2, 3, XIE Jiang-wei1, TENG Han-qing1   

  1. 1. State Key Laboratory of Intelligent Construction and Maintenance for Geotechnical and Tunnel Engineering under Extreme Environments, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu, Sichuan 610031, China; 2. China Northwest Research Institute Co., Ltd., of CREC, Lanzhou, Gansu 730030, China; 3. China Railway Academy Co., Ltd., Chengdu, Sichuan 610032, China
  • Received:2024-12-07 Accepted:2025-03-17 Online:2025-11-14 Published:2025-11-11
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the Science and Technology Research and Development Plan of China Railway Co., Ltd. (2022–Major Project–07), the National Natural Science Foundation of Sichuan Province (2025ZNSFSC0305) and Gansu Province Technology Innovation Guidance Plan-Special Funding for Capacity Building of Enterprise R & D Institutions (23CXJA0011).

Abstract: The stress analysis of sliding surface is the key link to evaluate the stability of slope and predict the risk of landslide. There are many methods to solve the sliding surface stress, but there is no reasonable method to evaluate these methods. In order to solve this problem, a sliding surface stress test device used in landslide model test was proposed. The structural characteristics and design principle of the device were introduced in detail. Three cases were designed to test the sliding surface stress by model test. Based on the correlation analysis and probability P value in the statistical analysis results of paired sample t-test, the applicability of Morgenstern-Price (M-P) method, elastic theoretical solution of sliding surface stress based on slope unloading and numerical analysis method in solving sliding surface stress was evaluated. The main conclusions are as follows: (1) The absolute error between the test results and the theoretical values of the 9 sliding surface test units is within 2.5%. The statistical analysis results show that the difference between the test results and the theoretical values is not significant, and the stability of the test results is good. (2) The elastic theoretical solution and numerical analysis method can accurately calculate the stress state of the sliding surface, but the calculation result of the M-P method has a large deviation from the actual one, which is not suitable for the calculation of slip surface stress in non-limit state. (3) The application of sliding surface stress elastic theory solution based on slope unloading in embankment slope is expanded, but this method still has great limitations. The sliding surface stress test device proposed in this paper expands the new method of sliding surface stress test, and provides a guarantee for the accuracy verification of sliding surface stress calculation and stability analysis theory.

Key words: landslide, sliding surface stress, model test, elastic theoretical solution, numerical analysis, statistical analysis

CLC Number: 

  • U 416.1+63
[1] DENG Qi-ning, CUI Yu-long, WANG Jiong-chao, ZHENG Jun, XU Chong, . ChatGPT-assisted programming approach for three-dimensional slope stability calculation [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(S1): 322-334.
[2] LAI Zhi-qiang, BAI Sheng-yuan, CHEN Lin, ZOU Wei-lie, XU Shu-ling, ZHAO Lian-jun, . Experimental study of dewatering characteristics of ring-type tube stockyard sludge storage [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(9): 2805-2815.
[3] HUANG Da-wei, LU Wen-jian, LUO Wen-jun, YU Jue, . An experimental study on the influence of synchronous grouting during shield tunnel construction on vertical displacement and surrounding earth pressure in sandy soil [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(9): 2837-2846.
[4] SONG Wei-tao, ZHANG Pei, DU Xiu-li, LIN Qing-tao, . Influence of soil property on ground response during construction of shallow shield tunnel [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(7): 2179-2188.
[5] YANG Bai, QIN Chao, ZHANG Yin-hai, WANG Wei, XIAO Shi-guo, . Model tests on bearing characteristics of pile with high rock-socketed ratio above an underlying karst cave [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(6): 1839-1850.
[6] SHI Zhan, ZHANG Tie-jun, LI Mei-xiang, TAO Si-ji, BO Yin, LI Yun-bo, . Model test of horizontal freezing reinforcement in mud tank of slurry balanced shield [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(5): 1534-1544.
[7] CHAI Hong-tao, WEN Song-lin, . Centrifugal model test on characteristics of pile foundation bearing capacity failure envelope curve under combined loading [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(5): 1556-1562.
[8] DONG Jian-hua, YANG Bo, TIAN Wen-tong, WU Xiao-lei, HE Peng-fei, ZHAO Lü-hua, LIAN Bo, . Research and development of novel anti-slide pile to prevent liquefaction and shaking table model test of seismic response [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(4): 1084-1094.
[9] REN Yi-qing, CHEN Bao-guo, REN Guo-qing, YANG Zhen-zhong, XU Fang. Stress characteristics of high-fill box culvert with soft layers placed on the top and sidewall during construction [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(4): 1153-1162.
[10] PEI Yuan-yuan, LONG Jian-hui, GUO Shi-yi, AN Cheng-ji, WENG Hang-yu, ZHANG Ji-ning, . Model test study on stress-strain characteristics of angled reinforced soil retaining wall under different loads [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(2): 539-550.
[11] JIN Gui-xiao, LIN Shao-cong, JIANG Qi-wu, CUI Ming-juan, HUANG Bin-Cai. Model tests research on the enzyme-induced calcium carbonate precipitation for anti-seepage and reinforcing in water-rich sand stratum [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(12): 3715-3726.
[12] GAN Fei, WANG Shou-hong, ZHENG Gang, ZHOU Hai-zuo, LI Mei-lin, WANG Hong, BI Jing, ZHANG Yuan-yin. Experimental investigation on mechanical properties of counterpressure pile sheet retaining wall [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(12): 3727-3739.
[13] DING Jun-ling, JI Feng, WEI Song, ZHANG Bo, ZENG Rui, LI Zhuo, LU Yu-peng. Model test of deformation and failure mechanism of gravel soil bank slope under rainfall and reservoir water level [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(12): 3740-3756.
[14] WANG Bing, HU Xiao-bo, KONG Nan-nan. Experimental study on vacuum combined with electro-osmosis for reinforcing ultrafine particle dredged soil [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(11): 3523-3533.
[15] LIU Wen-jing, DENG Hui, ZHOU Xin. Dynamic response of high steep rock slope with a double-layer ductile shear zone under earthquake action [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(11): 3534-3548.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!