Rock and Soil Mechanics ›› 2026, Vol. 47 ›› Issue (6): 1895-1905.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2025.0736

• Special Topic on Underground Engineering of Compressed Air Energy Storage • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Investigation on thickness selection method of sealing steel plate for CAES gas storage caverns

DAI Hong-jun1, YANG Xue2, CAI Sheng-hua1, JIANG Zhong-ming2, LIU Yi-ping1, ZHANG Yong1   

  1. 1. Jiangsu Power Design Institute Co., Ltd. of China Energy Engineering Group, Nanjing, Jiangsu 211100, China; 2. School of Hydraulic and Ocean Engineering, Changsha University of Science & Technology, Changsha, Hunan 410114, China
  • Received:2025-07-14 Accepted:2026-04-15 Online:2026-06-11 Published:2026-06-05
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the China Power Engineering Consulting Group Corporation Major Scientific and Technological Projects (DG3-G01-2023) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (52178381).

Abstract: The design of steel plate thickness holds substantial significance in the context of the sealing layer design for compressed air energy storage (CAES) artificial caverns. To ascertain the relationship between the steel plate thickness and factors such as the cavern diameter, surrounding rock modulus, and internal gas storage pressure, a numerical simulation method was used to analyze the stress characteristics of the steel plate under the influence of these aforementioned factors. Furthermore, a theoretical analysis method was adopted to examine the critical buckling thickness of the steel plate under external water pressure and the corrosion thickness of the steel plate under the operating environmental conditions of the CAES artificial caverns. Ultimately, considering the influencing factors such as stress deformation, buckling characteristics, and corrosion rate of the sealing steel plate, a method for determining the thickness of the sealing steel plate was proposed. The research results show that the fitted empirical formula, which establishes the relationship between gas storage pressure and steel plate thickness, exhibits minimal error when calculating critical pressure or critical thickness. Specifically, the error calculated by stress control is a mere 2.37%, while that calculated by strain control is only 2.35%. The critical thickness of steel plate without stiffening ring presents a nonlinear increasing trend as external pressure rises, whereas the critical thickness of steel plate with stiffening ring exhibits a linear increasing trend with the augmentation of external pressure. In the environment characterized by high temperature and high humidity, the surface of steel plate undergoes overall uneven corrosion, with severe localized corrosion. Consequently, the thickness of steel lining should be increased accordingly. Finally, the method proposed in this paper for determining the critical thickness of the steel lining demonstrates favorable applicability under the research conditions delineated herein, thereby offering valuable insights for the design of steel plate sealing strategies.

Key words: compressed air energy storage, artificial caverns, steel liner, steel plate thickness

CLC Number: 

  • TU57
[1] LU Qiao-rong, LI Qi-long, MAO Xin-ying, ZHOU Jia-qing, CHEN Yi-feng. Optimal design of lining structure in artificial cavern of compressed air energy storage [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2026, 47(6): 1878-1894.
[2] XU Chen, DENG Xing-fu, CHENG Li-juan, XIA Cai-chu. Nonlinear mechanical response of surrounding rock in compressed air energy storage cavern based on Hoek-Brown criterion [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2026, 47(6): 1865-1877.
[3] ZHANG Guo-hua, XU Yu, REN Xing-wei, ZHANG Shi-shu, JI Wen-dong, HUA Dong-jie. Cracking and yielding characteristics of underground lined storage reservoirs for compressed air energy storage [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2026, 47(6): 1847-1864.
[4] XIA Kai-zong, LIANG Wan, SI Zhi-wei, YANG Kuo-yu, LI Wen-jing, LI Si-han. Uplift failure of caverns for compressed-air energy storage in mines based on wave velocity in rock mass and Hoek-Brown criterion [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2026, 47(4): 1351-1363.
[5] XIE Chuan-jin, LUO Hong-mei, BAI Bing, LI Ji-yan, YANG Heng-tao, ZHENG Wen-zhao. Evaluation of the sealing performance of compressed air energy storage spaces in aquifers: theory and applications [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2026, 47(2): 562-570.
[6] HU Gang, RUI Rui, JIANG Qiang-qiang, WANG Yong-ping, ZHANG Wen-tao. Fracture initiation angle and pressure in tunnel-excavated hard rock caverns for compressed air energy storage: a 2D numerical analysis [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2026, 47(2): 549-561.
[7] LIU Shun, CHENG Hao-de, JIA Ning, WANG Hong-bo, YIN Hong-lei. Bernoulli temperature control scheme for compressed air energy storage tunnel-type underground lined cavern [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2026, 47(2): 539-548.
[8] CAO Xiao-yong, GUAN Shao-yu, YE Xin-xin. Stability analysis method for underground lined storage cavern group in compressed air energy storage power station [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2026, 47(2): 530-538.
[9] ZHANG Guo-hua, GUO Hui, ZHANG Shi-shu, ZHOU Zhi-yi, XIANG Yue, XIONG Feng, HUA Dong-jie. Method for determining the optimal axial ratio of elliptical section and operating pressure range in CAES underground gas storage facility [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2026, 47(2): 515-529.
[10] SUN Guan-hua, WANG Zhang-xing, WANG Jiao, DONG Yi-Xin, SHI Lu, LIU Zhi-jun, LIN Shan. FDEM-based collaborative optimization of sealing structure and lining preset joint design in underground lined rock caverns [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2026, 47(2): 497-514.
[11] ZHANG Gui-min, SUN Wen-qing, ZHU Ze-fan, SU Yong-kang, ZHU Xu-cong. Influence of construction gap on the force of steel lining in compressed air storage cavern [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2026, 47(2): 485-496.
[12] CHENG Hao-de, JIA Ning, LIU Shun, NIE Hui-jian, LIANG Hao. Calculation method of heat transfer in multi-layer sealing structure of artificial caverns for compressed air energy storage [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2026, 47(2): 470-484.
[13] CAO Xiao-yong, LIU Rui-hui, LI Jian-fei, YE Xin-xin, GENG Jun-yang, TAN Hai-xing. Sealing system design and model testing of lining structures for artificial underground gas storage caverns in medium-hard rock strata [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2026, 47(2): 426-436.
[14] GE Xin-bo, HUANG Jun, ZHAO Tong-bin, TAO Gang, MA Hong-ling, WANG Wei. A review of the application of artificial intelligence in underground engineering for compressed air energy storage [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2026, 47(2): 413-425.
[15] TAN Yun-zhi, GUO Jin-hui, WU Ke-yu, MING Hua-jun, WANG Chong, WU Jun. Development and experimental verification of constant stiffness swelling apparatus [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2026, 47(2): 402-412.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!