Rock and Soil Mechanics ›› 2026, Vol. 47 ›› Issue (6): 1878-1894.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2025.0827

• Special Topic on Underground Engineering of Compressed Air Energy Storage • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Optimal design of lining structure in artificial cavern of compressed air energy storage

LU Qiao-rong1, 2, LI Qi-long1, 2, MAO Xin-ying3, ZHOU Jia-qing1, 2, CHEN Yi-feng1, 2   

  1. 1. State Key Laboratory of Water Resources Engineering and Management, Wuhan University, Wuhan, Hubei 430072, China; 2. Key Laboratory of Rock Mechanics in Hydraulic Structural Engineering of the Ministry of Education, Wuhan University, Wuhan, Hubei 430072, China; 3. Central Southern China Electric Power Design Institute Corporation Limited of China Power Engineering, Wuhan, Hubei 430060, China
  • Received:2025-07-31 Accepted:2026-02-03 Online:2026-06-11 Published:2026-06-05
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the Natural Science Foundation of Hubei Province (2025AFA098, 2022CFA028) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51988101).

Abstract: Compressed air energy storage (CAES) is a key technology for the consumption of renewable energy and peak shaving of power grid. Artificial cavern gas storage has promising application prospects because it is less constrained by site selection and offers better controllability of construction quality. However, the lining and surrounding rock are subjected to significant tensile stress during high-pressure operation. When the maximum tensile stress exceeds the material’s critical strength, tensile failure occurs. To address this issue, the reinforcement ratio of the lining must usually be increased, or the chamber size and storage pressure must be reduced. However, these measures increase construction costs and limit storage capacity. In this study, an optimized structure is proposed in which the lining is placed inside the sealing layer. From the inside outward, the structure consists of the lining, sealing layer, leveling layer, initial support, and surrounding rock. Numerical simulations and analyses are conducted based on a thermo-mechanical coupling model. The results show that the sealing layer temperature in the optimized structure is significantly lower than that in the traditional structure because of the protective effect of the lining. When using steel plate as the sealing material, the maximum temperature is reduced by 46.08%. In terms of stress, the entire lining structure is subjected to circumferential tension and radial compression. After structural optimization, the maximum tensile stresses in the sealing layer, concrete lining, and surrounding rock are reduced by 16.00%, 28.19%, and 24.73%, respectively. Furthermore, the load-sharing results show that more than 70% of the pressure is borne by the surrounding rock in both structures. In terms of deformation, the maximum displacement occurs at the top of the lining. The overall displacement variation of the optimized structure is relatively small. Further analysis examines the lining structure’s mechanical response under high, medium, and low in situ stress levels. Compared with the traditional structure, the optimized structure reduces the sealing layer’s maximum first principal stress by 40.26%, 32.01%, and 22.46% under high, medium, and low in situ stress levels, respectively. This reduction demonstrates the optimized structure’s effectiveness in mitigating circumferential tensile stress in the sealing layer. Surrounding rock grade and deformation modulus significantly influence the structure’s mechanical response. For gas storage sites, surrounding rock of Grade III or higher is selected. Moreover, the mechanical properties of four kinds of sealing layer materials are compared. The steel plate and fiber-reinforced plastic (FRP) are subjected to circumferential tension and radial compression, whereas flexible concrete and rubber are in compression. Steel plate is recommended for traditional structure, whereas flexible concrete is recommended as the sealing material for optimized structure, because it minimizes stress and deformation in the surrounding rock. In summary, for artificial cavern gas storage, the optimized structure proposed in this study is more conducive to structural stability than the traditional structure. The findings provide valuable guidance for the design of artificial cavern lining structures in compressed air energy storage applications.

Key words: compressed air energy storage, artificial cavern, lining structure, combined bearing of lining and surrounding rock, design optimization

CLC Number: 

  • TU457
[1] DAI Hong-jun, YANG Xue, CAI Sheng-hua, JIANG Zhong-ming, LIU Yi-ping, ZHANG Yong. Investigation on thickness selection method of sealing steel plate for CAES gas storage caverns [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2026, 47(6): 1895-1905.
[2] XU Chen, DENG Xing-fu, CHENG Li-juan, XIA Cai-chu. Nonlinear mechanical response of surrounding rock in compressed air energy storage cavern based on Hoek-Brown criterion [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2026, 47(6): 1865-1877.
[3] ZHANG Guo-hua, XU Yu, REN Xing-wei, ZHANG Shi-shu, JI Wen-dong, HUA Dong-jie. Cracking and yielding characteristics of underground lined storage reservoirs for compressed air energy storage [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2026, 47(6): 1847-1864.
[4] XIA Kai-zong, LIANG Wan, SI Zhi-wei, YANG Kuo-yu, LI Wen-jing, LI Si-han. Uplift failure of caverns for compressed-air energy storage in mines based on wave velocity in rock mass and Hoek-Brown criterion [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2026, 47(4): 1351-1363.
[5] CAO Xiao-yong, LIU Rui-hui, LI Jian-fei, YE Xin-xin, GENG Jun-yang, TAN Hai-xing. Sealing system design and model testing of lining structures for artificial underground gas storage caverns in medium-hard rock strata [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2026, 47(2): 426-436.
[6] GE Xin-bo, HUANG Jun, ZHAO Tong-bin, TAO Gang, MA Hong-ling, WANG Wei. A review of the application of artificial intelligence in underground engineering for compressed air energy storage [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2026, 47(2): 413-425.
[7] TAN Yun-zhi, GUO Jin-hui, WU Ke-yu, MING Hua-jun, WANG Chong, WU Jun. Development and experimental verification of constant stiffness swelling apparatus [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2026, 47(2): 402-412.
[8] ZHANG Guo-hua, XIANG Yue, ZHANG Shi-shu, WANG Xin-jin, GUO Hui, XIONG Feng, HUA Dong-jie. Analysis of elastic-plastic deformation of surrounding rock mass throughout the whole operation process of the compressed air energy storage caverns [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2026, 47(2): 383-401.
[9] WONG Tsun-ming, ZHAO Xiang-yang, MA Hong-ling, WANG Lei, ZHANG Jia-min. Feasibility analysis of the comprehensive utilization of coupling salt cavern CAES and insoluble sediment thermal storage [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2026, 47(2): 373-382.
[10] SUN Guan-hua, GENG Xuan, JIANG Chang-fei, SHI Lu, ZHANG Jin-tao, JIANG Wei. Analytical model and evolution law of the surrounding rock failure zone in lined rock caverns for compressed air energy storage power stations [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2026, 47(2): 359-372.
[11] XIE Chuan-jin, LUO Hong-mei, BAI Bing, LI Ji-yan, YANG Heng-tao, ZHENG Wen-zhao. Evaluation of the sealing performance of compressed air energy storage spaces in aquifers: theory and applications [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2026, 47(2): 562-570.
[12] HU Gang, RUI Rui, JIANG Qiang-qiang, WANG Yong-ping, ZHANG Wen-tao. Fracture initiation angle and pressure in tunnel-excavated hard rock caverns for compressed air energy storage: a 2D numerical analysis [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2026, 47(2): 549-561.
[13] LIU Shun, CHENG Hao-de, JIA Ning, WANG Hong-bo, YIN Hong-lei. Bernoulli temperature control scheme for compressed air energy storage tunnel-type underground lined cavern [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2026, 47(2): 539-548.
[14] CAO Xiao-yong, GUAN Shao-yu, YE Xin-xin. Stability analysis method for underground lined storage cavern group in compressed air energy storage power station [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2026, 47(2): 530-538.
[15] ZHANG Guo-hua, GUO Hui, ZHANG Shi-shu, ZHOU Zhi-yi, XIANG Yue, XIONG Feng, HUA Dong-jie. Method for determining the optimal axial ratio of elliptical section and operating pressure range in CAES underground gas storage facility [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2026, 47(2): 515-529.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!