Rock and Soil Mechanics ›› 2026, Vol. 47 ›› Issue (7): 2235-2247.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2025.0588

• Fundamental Theory and Experimental Research • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Machine learning-based prediction and interpretability analysis of Longxi loess collapsibility coefficient

LIU De-ren, WANG Kai-qiang, ZHANG Yan-jie, WANG Shuai-qun, WANG Yu-fei   

  1. School of Civil Engineering, Lanzhou Jiaotong University., Lanzhou, Gansu 730070, China
  • Received:2025-06-09 Accepted:2026-03-03 Online:2026-07-13 Published:2026-07-08
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51868038).

Abstract:

The prediction methods for the collapsibility coefficient of loess are predominantly based on regression analysis, but they are significantly influenced by the regional characteristics of loess, leading to insufficient prediction accuracy. Furthermore, existing machine learning prediction methods have limitations in interpretability. Focusing on the loess in the Longxi region, five pivotal influencing factors, namely, density, saturation, self-weight stress, liquid limit, and internal friction angle, were identified through correlation and cluster analyses. Subsequently, prediction models for the loess collapsibility coefficient were constructed using extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost), random forest (RF), support vector machine (SVM), and regression analysis. Additionally, an interpretability analysis of the prediction outcomes was performed using the Shapley additive explanations (SHAP) technique. The results show that the correlation coefficients between the collapsibility coefficient of Longxi loess and various indices such as density, dry density, void ratio, saturation, and internal friction angle range from 0.63 to 0.90, indicating extremely strong or strong correlations. Both the XGBoost and RF models demonstrate a prediction accuracy exceeding 90% for the collapsibility coefficient and collapsibility grade, thereby outperforming the SVM model and conventional regression methods. The SHAP analysis reveals that loess with a density less than 1.44 g/cm3 has a higher probability of collapsibility, while loess with a saturation greater than 29.0% has a relatively lower collapsibility grade. Moreover, loess under high saturation and high self-weight stress conditions exhibits weaker collapsibility tendency and lower collapsibility grade. The findings provide a theoretical reference for loess engineering construction in the Longxi region.

Key words: Longxi loess, collapsibility coefficient, parameter correlation analysis, machine learning, SHAP interpretability analysis

CLC Number: 

  • TU 452
[1] SUN Jia-hao, LI Di-yuan, XIE Lian-ku. An improved robust random forest algorithm for predicting hard rock pillar stability [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2026, 47(5): 1788-1800.
[2] GE Xin-bo, HUANG Jun, ZHAO Tong-bin, TAO Gang, MA Hong-ling, WANG Wei. A review of the application of artificial intelligence in underground engineering for compressed air energy storage [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2026, 47(2): 413-425.
[3] JIANG Xiao-tong, ZHANG Xi-wen, LÜ Ying-hui, LI Ren-jie, JIANG Hao, . Current applications and future prospects of machine learning in geotechnical engineering [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(S1): 419-436.
[4] CAI Qi-hang, DONG Xue-chao, GUO Ming-wei, LU Zheng, XU An, JIANG Fan, . Intelligent prediction of sinking of super-large anchorage caisson foundation based on soil pressure at cutting edges [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(S1): 377-388.
[5] ZHEN Jia-jie, LAI Feng-wen, HUANG Ming, LIAO Qing-xiang, LI Shuang, DUAN Yue-qiang. Intelligent geological condition recognition in shield tunneling via time-series clustering and online learning [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(11): 3615-3625.
[6] HE Long-ping, YAO Nan, WANG Qi-hu, YE Yi-cheng, LING Ji-suo, . Rock burst intensity grading prediction model based on automatic machine learning [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2024, 45(9): 2839-2848.
[7] LONG Xiao, SUN Rui, ZHENG Tong, . Convolutional neural network-based liquefaction prediction model and interpretability analysis [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2024, 45(9): 2741-2753.
[8] YANG Yang, WEI Yi-tong. A new method of liquefaction probability level evaluation based on classification tree [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2024, 45(7): 2175-2186.
[9] DENG Zhi-xing, XIE Kang, LI Tai-feng, WANG Wu-bin, HAO Zhe-rui, LI Jia-shen, . A novel method for quality control of vibratory compaction in high-speed railway graded aggregates based on the embedded locking point of coarse particles [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2024, 45(6): 1835-1849.
[10] PAN Qiu-jing, WU Hong-tao, ZHANG Zi-long, SONG Ke-zhi, . Prediction of tunneling-induced ground surface settlement within composite strata using multi-physics-informed neural network [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2024, 45(2): 539-551.
[11] JIANG Ming-jing, ZHANG Lu-feng, HAN Liang, JIANG Peng-ming, . Damage law of structured sand using symbolic regression algorithm [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2024, 45(12): 3768-3778.
[12] WU Shuang-shuang, HU Xin-li, SUN Shao-rui, WEI Ji-hong, . A case study of mechanism for intermittent deformation and early warning of landslides [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2023, 44(S1): 593-602.
[13] DONG Xue-chao, GUO Ming-wei, WANG Shui-lin, . Sinking state prediction and optimal sensor placement of super large open caissons based on LightGBM [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2023, 44(6): 1789-1799.
[14] YU Hong, CHEN Xiao-bin, YI Li-qin, QIU Jun, GU Zheng-hao, ZHAO Hui, . Parameter inversion and application of soft soil modified Cambridge model [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2023, 44(11): 3318-3326.
[15] ZHANG Wen-gang, GU Xin, LIU Han-long, ZHANG Qing, WANG Lin, WANG Lu-qi, . Probabilistic back analysis of soil parameters and displacement prediction of unsaturated slopes using Bayesian updating [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2022, 43(4): 1112-1122.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!