›› 2015, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (S2): 64-72.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2015.S2.008

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

活性MgO碱性激发粒化高炉矿渣固化黏土的抗硫酸盐侵蚀试验研究

于博伟,杜延军,刘辰阳,薄煜琳   

  1. 东南大学 岩土工程研究所,江苏 南京 210096
  • 收稿日期:2014-07-20 出版日期:2015-08-31 发布日期:2018-06-14
  • 通讯作者: 杜延军,男,1972年生,博士,教授,博士生导师,主要从事环境岩土方面的研究。E-mail: duyanjun@seu.edu.cn E-mail:fish1991222@gmail.com
  • 作者简介:于博伟,男,1991年生,硕士研究生,主要从事环境岩土方面的研究
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金重点项目(No.41330641);国家自然科学基金(No.51278100,No.41472258);江苏省自然科学基金杰出青年项目(No.BK2012022);江苏省自然科学基金(No.2011618)。

Study of durability of reactive magnesia-activated ground granulated blast-furnace slag stabilized soil attacked by sulfate sodium solution

YU Bo-wei, DU Yan-jun, LIU Chen-yang, BO Yu-lin   

  1. Institute of Geotechnical Engineering, Southeast University, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210096, China
  • Received:2014-07-20 Online:2015-08-31 Published:2018-06-14

摘要: 通过系列室内试验,研究了硫酸盐长期浸泡环境下GGBS-MgO固化黏土的物理和力学性质及微观特征变化规律,并与水泥固化黏土进行对比,揭示了GGBS-MgO固化黏土抵抗硫酸盐侵蚀的机制。与水泥固化黏土相比,硫酸盐浸泡条件下GGBS-MgO固化黏土表面完整度较好;质量变化率在浸泡120 d时仅为水泥固化黏土的0.25倍;固化黏土体pH略小于同期水泥固化黏土;浸泡初期GGBS-MgO固化黏土强度增长达20%,同周期时无侧限抗压强度较水泥固化黏土高15%~80%。X射线衍射试验(XRD)表明,硫酸盐侵蚀下GGBS-MgO固化黏土中水化硅酸钙(C-S-H凝胶)的峰值高于水泥固化黏土,而钙矾石(AFt)的XRD图谱峰值明显低于水泥固化黏土。电镜扫描试验结果表明,两种固化黏土中钙矾石形态明显不同:钙矾石在水泥固化黏土中以团聚型晶体存在,可具较强膨胀性,而在GGBS-MgO固化黏土中则以细短形态分布于颗粒间,可有效填充试样孔隙,使其具备良好的抗硫酸盐侵蚀能力。

关键词: 活性氧化镁, 粒化高炉矿渣粉, 固化黏土, 硫酸盐浸泡, 耐久性能

Abstract: This study investigates the physico-mechanical properties, as well as the microstructural characteristics of the reactive magnesia (MgO)-activated ground granulated blast-furnace slag (GGBS) stabilized kaolin clay via a series of Na2SO4 solution soaking durability tests. For the purpose of comparison, the cement stabilized kaolin clay is selected as a control sample. The results show that the mass loss of GGBS-MgO stabilized soil is 0.25 times lower than that of PC stabilized soil soaked for 120 days. The unconfined compression strength (qu) of GGBS-MgO stabilized soil has a significant increase of as much as 20% at the early stage. Furthermore, qu of GGBS-MgO stabilized soil is 15% to 80% higher than that of PC stabilized soil. The results of X-ray diffraction analysis show that the GGBS-MgO stabilized soil has higher peak of calcium silicate hydrate (C-S-H) and lower peak of AFt relative to the PC stabilized soil. The scanning electron microscopy test shows the morphological characteristics of ettringite(AFt) in these two types of stabilized soils are different. For the PC stabilized soil, the AFt exists in the form of swelling aggregates. Unlike PC stabilized soil, the AFt of GGBS-MgO stabilized soil is in the fine small form and exists between the soil particles, which can promote the filling of large pores, leading to a higher resistance to the sulfate attack.

Key words: reactive MgO, ground granulated blast-furnace slag, stabilized soil, sulfate-soaking, durability

中图分类号: 

  • TU 443
[1] 刘松玉,曹菁菁,蔡光华, . 活性氧化镁碳化固化粉质黏土微观机制[J]. , 2018, 39(5): 1543-1552.
[2] 薄煜琳 ,于博伟 ,杜延军 ,魏明俐 , . 淋滤条件下GGBS-MgO固化铅污染黏土强度与溶出特性研究[J]. , 2015, 36(10): 2877-2891.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 王观石,李长洪,陈保君,李世海. 应力波在非线性结构面介质中的传播规律[J]. , 2009, 30(12): 3747 -3752 .
[2] 王朝阳,许 强,倪万魁. 原状黄土CT试验中应力-应变关系的研究[J]. , 2010, 31(2): 387 -391 .
[3] 邓 琴,郭明伟,李春光,葛修润. 基于边界元法的边坡矢量和稳定分析[J]. , 2010, 31(6): 1971 -1976 .
[4] 万少石,年廷凯,蒋景彩,栾茂田. 边坡稳定强度折减有限元分析中的若干问题讨论[J]. , 2010, 31(7): 2283 -2288 .
[5] 闫 铁,李 玮,毕雪亮. 基于分形方法的多孔介质有效应力模型研究[J]. , 2010, 31(8): 2625 -2629 .
[6] 刘 嘉,王 栋. 正常固结黏土中平板锚基础的吸力和抗拉力[J]. , 2009, 30(3): 735 -740 .
[7] 赵尚毅,郑颖人,李安洪,邱文平,唐晓松,徐 俊. 多排埋入式抗滑桩在武隆县政府滑坡中的应用[J]. , 2009, 30(S1): 160 -164 .
[8] 刘振平,贺怀建,朱发华. 基于钻孔数据的三维可视化快速建模技术的研究[J]. , 2009, 30(S1): 260 -266 .
[9] 魏厚振,颜荣涛,韦昌富,吴二林,陈 盼,田慧会. 含天然气水合物沉积物相平衡问题研究综述[J]. , 2011, 32(8): 2287 -2294 .
[10] 赵跃堂,林家炜,石 磊. 冲击荷载作用下层裂问题研究[J]. , 2011, 32(S2): 122 -126 .