›› 2016, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (S2): 469-475.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2016.S2.061

• 岩土工程研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

延吉膨胀岩膨胀力的水-力路径效应与应用适宜性分析

曾志雄,孔令伟,黄珏皓,臧 濛   

  1. 中国科学院武汉岩土力学研究所 岩土力学与工程国家重点实验室,湖北 武汉 430071
  • 收稿日期:2016-04-22 出版日期:2016-11-11 发布日期:2018-06-09
  • 作者简介:曾志雄,男,1990年生,硕士研究生,主要从事特殊土土力学与地基基础方面的研究
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(No.41430634);岩土力学与工程国家重点实验室自主部署项目(No.Y11002)

Effect of hydro-mechanical path on swelling pressure of Yanji swelling rock and its application suitability analysis

ZENG Zhi-xiong, KONG Ling-wei, HUANG Jue-hao, ZANG Meng   

  1. State Key Laboratory of Geomechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, Institute of Rock and Soil Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan, Hubei 430071, China
  • Received:2016-04-22 Online:2016-11-11 Published:2018-06-09
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (41430634) and the State Key Laboratory of Geomechanics and Geotechnical Engineering (Y11002).

摘要: 膨胀力是膨胀岩土地区工程设计和施工中的重要参数,目前常用的膨胀力试验方法主要有膨胀反压法、平衡加压法和加压膨胀法3种。膨胀力大小容易受试验方法的影响。为了研究试验方法对膨胀力的影响,以延吉膨胀岩为研究对象,采用上述3种方法开展了不同初始含水率试样的膨胀力试验,分析比较了3种试验方法的特点和适用范围。结果表明,膨胀力具有强烈的水-力路径效应,3种方法确定的膨胀力存在较大差异,膨胀反压法测得的膨胀力最大,加压膨胀法最小;3种方法确定的膨胀力与初始含水率之间存在明显的线性负相关关系,随着试样初始含水率的增加,不同方法得到的膨胀力与初始含水率的关系曲线逐渐靠拢,水-力路径对膨胀力试验结果的影响逐渐减弱,每一种方法有其自身的特点和特定的适用范围,膨胀力测试应该根据实际工况选择合适的试验方法。

关键词: 膨胀力, 膨胀反压法, 平衡加压法, 加压膨胀法, 水-力路径, 适宜性

Abstract: Swelling pressure is an important parameter for the design and construction of geotechnical engineering in swelling rock and soil regions. The swell and load method, the no-swell method, and the load-swell method are the three most commonly used methods for determining swelling pressure. Swelling pressure depends significantly on test method. To explore the effect of testing method on swelling pressure, swelling pressure tests of Yanji swelling rock specimens with different initial water contents were carried out using the above-mentioned three methods; and characteristics of three methods and their application scopes were analyzed and compared. The results indicate that three methods show different values in swelling pressure; and there is a clear effect of hydro-mechanical path on swelling pressure. The swell and load method provides the highest value of swelling pressure; while the load-swell method provides the lowest. There is a significant negative linear relationship between the swelling pressure and the initial water content. Relationships between the swelling pressure and the initial water content obtained by three methods tend to be close to each other with the increasing initial water content, which illustrates that the effect of hydro-mechanical path on swelling pressure is weakened. Every method has its respective characteristic and specific application scope; so testing method of swelling pressure should be determined by practical engineering conditions.

Key words: swelling pressure, swell and load method, no-swell method, load-swell method, hydro-mechanical path, suitability

中图分类号: 

  • TU 452
[1] 任连伟,周桂林,顿志林,何停印,杨权威,张敏霞,. 采空区建筑地基适宜性及沉降变形计算工程实例分析[J]. , 2018, 39(8): 2922-2932.
[2] 安 然, 孔令伟, 黎澄生, 郭爱国, . 确定残积土原位G-γ衰减曲线的建议方法 与适宜性分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2018, 39(12): 4429-4435.
[3] 鲜少华,许英姿,姚海林,卢 正,李志勇,董 城,. 锚固加强植被系统约束膨胀土变形模型试验研究[J]. , 2017, 38(S1): 158-166.
[4] 池泽成,陈善雄,周 哲,戴张俊,宋瑞军, . 合肥重塑膨胀土三向膨胀力试验研究[J]. , 2017, 38(S1): 381-386.
[5] 陈志国,唐朝生,叶为民,王德银,王 鹏,孙凯强,施 斌,. 水-力耦合条件下膨润土-砂混合物的体变特性研究[J]. , 2017, 38(4): 1041-1051.
[6] 陈 宝,田昌春,郭家兴,陈建琴,. 地下水对压实高庙子膨润土冲蚀作用研究[J]. , 2016, 37(11): 3224-3230.
[7] 周葆春,张彦钧,汤致松,马全国,冯冬冬,梁维云. 不同压实度荆门弱膨胀土的一维膨胀-压缩特性[J]. , 2014, 35(5): 1275-1283.
[8] 谈云志 ,胡新江 ,喻 波 ,刘晓玲 ,万 智 ,张振华,. 压实红黏土的恒体积膨胀力与细观机制研究[J]. , 2014, 35(3): 653-658.
[9] 曾仲毅 ,徐帮树 ,胡世权 ,陈 诚,. 增湿条件下膨胀土隧道衬砌破坏数值分析[J]. , 2014, 35(3): 871-880.
[10] 何芳婵 ,李宗坤,. 南水北调南阳段弱膨胀土增湿膨胀与力学特性试验研究[J]. , 2013, 34(S2): 190-194.
[11] 孙德安,张 龙. 盐溶液饱和高庙子膨润土膨胀特性及预测[J]. , 2013, 34(10): 2790-2795.
[12] 胡 畔 ,杨 庆. 膨润土加砂混合物膨胀特征试验研究[J]. , 2012, 33(2): 453-458.
[13] 樊恒辉 ,高建恩 ,吴普特 ,娄宗科. 基于黄土物理化学性质变化的固化土强度影响因素分析[J]. , 2011, 32(7): 1996-2000.
[14] 张虎元,崔素丽,刘吉胜,梁 健. 混合型缓冲回填材料膨胀力试验研究[J]. , 2010, 31(10): 3087-3095.
[15] 何 山,朱珍德,韩立军,王思敬. 红山窑风化红砂岩膨胀机制微细观分析[J]. , 2009, 30(S2): 192-195.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!