›› 2018, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (11): 3929-3936.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2017.0341

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

法向刚度对土与结构接触面三维特性影响的试验研究

冯大阔1, 2,张建民1, 3   

  1. 1. 清华大学 水沙科学与水利水电工程国家重点实验室,北京 100084; 2. 中国建筑第七工程局有限公司,河南 郑州 450004;3. 清华大学 岩土工程研究所,北京 100084
  • 收稿日期:2017-03-03 出版日期:2018-11-10 发布日期:2018-11-15
  • 作者简介:冯大阔,男,1984年生,博士,高级工程师,主要从事岩土工程与抗震、绿色施工和装配式建造方面的研究工作
  • 基金资助:
    “十三五”国家重点研发计划课题(No. 2016YFC0701705);国家自然科学基金面上项目(No. 51678346)

Influence of normal stiffness on 3D monotonic and cyclic behaviors of a gravel-structure interface

FENG Da-kuo1, 2, ZHANG Jian-min1, 3   

  1. 1. State Key Laboratory of Hydroscience and Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China; 2. China Construction Seventh Engineering Division Corp. Ltd., Zhengzhou, Henan 450004, China; 3. Institute of Geotechnical Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China
  • Received:2017-03-03 Online:2018-11-10 Published:2018-11-15
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Key Research and Development Program (2016YFC0701705) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51678346).

摘要: 运用80 t大型三维接触面试验机,对不同法向刚度下粗粒土与结构接触面三维静动力学特性进行了试验研究,重点分析了法向刚度对接触面力学特性的影响规律。法向常刚度条件下,接触面在单调剪切时均先剪缩再剪胀、法向应力先减小后增大;循环剪切时接触面不可逆性剪切体变呈单调增长、可逆性剪切体变峰值逐渐减小后趋于稳定,切向应力峰值不断减小,抗剪强度逐渐减小,主应力比峰值则基本保持不变。法向刚度主要影响剪切体变、可逆性剪切体变、切向应力、主剪应力等接触面力学性能参数的大小;法向刚度越大,单调剪切时法向应力变化越大、切向应力峰值越大、剪缩和剪胀量越小;循环剪切时不可逆性剪切体变增长越慢、最终值越小,抗剪强度减小越快、达到0时对应的循环周次越少。法向刚度对剪切体变、可逆性剪切体变、主剪应力、主应力比等性能参数与切向位移的关系形式及接触面摩擦角基本没有影响。

关键词: 接触面, 粗粒土, 三维力学特性, 法向刚度, 直剪试验

Abstract: Applied with a new large-scale interface apparatus, the influence of normal stiffness on 3D monotonic and cyclic behavior of the gravel-structure interface was investigated in detail. Under constant normal stiffness condition, the interface contracts first and then dilates, and the normal stress accordingly reduces and then increases during monotonic shearing. The irreversible volumetric change of the interface grows continuously, the normal stress, peak shear stress, shear strength of the interface decreases overall due to cyclic shearing while the peak resultant stress ratio remains invariable despite of shear cycle. It is indicated that the normal stiffness plays a vital role in 3D monotonic and cyclic behavior of the interface. With larger normal stiffness, the normal stress and the peak shear stress increase more during monotonic shearing; the irreversible volumetric change accumulates more slowly and its ultimate value is accordingly smaller. Meanwhile, the shear strength of the interface decreases faster to zero and the corresponding cycle number at which the shear strength becomes zero is smaller. The normal stiffness has a markable impacts on the value of performance parameters of the interface such as the irreversible and reversible volumetric change, shear stress, resultant shear stress, except the friction angle. In addition, good consistency exists in the relationship pattern between volumetric change, reversible volumetric change, resultant shear stress and resultant stress ratio versus tangential displacement, regardless of normal stiffness.

Key words: Interface, gravelly soil, 3D behavior, normal stiffness, direct shear test

中图分类号: 

  • TU 411

[1] 徐衍, 周晓敏, 和晓楠, 吴涛, 张建岭, 李森. 矿山竖井井壁与围岩热−固耦合作用分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(S1): 217-226.
[2] 王康宇, 庄妍, 耿雪玉, . 铁路路基粗粒土填料临界动应力试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(6): 1865-1873.
[3] 樊科伟, 刘斯宏, 廖洁, 方斌昕, 王建磊, . 袋装石土工袋剪切力学特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 477-484.
[4] 夏才初, 喻强锋, 钱 鑫, 桂 洋, 庄小清. 常法向刚度条件下岩石节理剪切−渗 流特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(1): 57-66.
[5] 柴 维, 龙志林, 旷杜敏, 陈佳敏, 闫超萍. 直剪剪切速率对钙质砂强度及变形特征的影响[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 359-366.
[6] 李文轩, 卞士海, 李国英, 吴俊杰, . 粗粒料接触面模型及其在土石坝工程中的应用[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(6): 2379-2388.
[7] 陈国庆, 唐 鹏, 李光明, 张广泽, 王 栋, . 岩桥直剪试验声发射频谱特征及主破裂前兆分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(5): 1649-1656.
[8] 周 辉, 程广坦, 朱 勇, 陈 珺, 卢景景, 崔国建, 杨聘卿, . 大理岩规则齿形结构面剪切特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(3): 852-860.
[9] 郭万里, 朱俊高, 钱 彬, 张 丹, . 粗粒土的颗粒破碎演化模型及其试验验证[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(3): 1023-1029.
[10] 秦昌安, 陈国庆, 郑海君, 唐 鹏. 端部岩桥直剪破坏试验及断裂条件[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(2): 642-653.
[11] 郭万里, 蔡正银, 武颖利, 黄英豪. 粗粒土的颗粒破碎耗能及剪胀方程研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(12): 4703-4710.
[12] 李春红, 孔纲强, 张鑫蕊, 刘汉龙, 许晓亮, 许俊奎, . 温控桩-土接触面三轴试验系统研制与验证[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(12): 4955-4962.
[13] 张 磊, 刘 慧, 王铁行. 固结与不固结条件下黄土-混凝土接触面剪切试验[J]. 岩土力学, 2018, 39(S2): 238-244.
[14] 崔国建,张传庆,刘立鹏,周 辉,程广坦,. 锚杆杆体–砂浆界面力学特性的剪切速率效应研究[J]. , 2018, 39(S1): 275-281.
[15] 魏匡民,陈生水,李国英,吴俊杰, . 陡峻河谷高面板坝坝体与坝基接触效应[J]. , 2018, 39(9): 3415-3424.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!