›› 2017, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (5): 1510-1516.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2017.05.035

• 数值分析 • 上一篇    下一篇

亚塑性模型不同积分算法的数值实现

王仁超,曹婷婷,刘严如   

  1. 天津大学 水利工程仿真与安全国家重点实验室,天津 300072
  • 收稿日期:2015-06-12 出版日期:2017-05-11 发布日期:2018-06-05
  • 作者简介:王仁超,男,1963年生,博士,教授,主要从事大型工程系统分析、项目管理及计算机仿真方面的研究工作。

Implementations of hypoplastic model based on different time integration algorithms

WANG Ren-chao, CAO Ting-ting, LIU Yan-ru   

  1. State Key Laboratory of Hydraulic Engineering Simulation and Safety, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072, China
  • Received:2015-06-12 Online:2017-05-11 Published:2018-06-05

摘要: 亚塑性模型是以Jaumann应力率张量及变形率张量描述的一种率型本构关系,本构关系在非线性有限元分析计算中具有关键作用,解决用应变增量求解应力响应的问题需要一个时间积分过程。针对亚塑性本构模型发展了自适应隐式和显式两种不同的积分算法,给出了误差控制的方法,同时推导了自适应隐式积分算法所需的一致切向模量,并采用了两个不同的单元,利用ABAQUS平台比较了两种积分算法的数值模拟结果。为了实现从ABAQUS/Standard到ABAQUS/Explicit的过渡,开发了UMAT-VUMAT接口,从而可以使已有的UMAT子程序用于大变形动力问题分析。算例分析证明了研究结果的正确性。

关键词: 亚塑性, 隐式积分算法, 显示积分算法, ABAQUS平台

Abstract: It is well known that the constitutive relation plays a key role in the nonlinear finite element analysis, and a time integration is particularly required to solve the problem whose stress response is deduced by its strain increment. The hypoplastic rate constitutive model is represented by Jaumann stress rate and deformation rate, and on the basis of this model, we develop adaptive implicit and explicit integration methods with local error control respectively. Meanwhile, the consistent tangent modulus is given for the implicit integration. Based on two different element tests, results of two types of numerical simulations of integration algorithm are compared by using ABAQUS. Moreover, a UMAT-VUMAT interface is developed to implement the transition from ABAQUS/ Standard to ABAQUS/Explicit and then the flow chart of this development is presented. Therefore, the existing UMAT subroutine can be used for large deformation or high-degree dynamic problem analysis. Finally, the accuracy of numerical results is verified by a case study.

Key words: hypoplastic, explicit adaptive integration, implicit adaptive integration, ABAQUS software

中图分类号: 

  • O345

[1] 程昊, 唐辉明, 吴琼, 雷国平. 一种考虑水力滞回效应的非饱和土弹塑性扩展 剑桥本构模型显式算法有限元实现[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 676-686.
[2] 肖勇杰,陈福全,董译之. 基于Gudehus-Bauer模型的砂土中灌注桩护壁套管高频振动贯入速率[J]. , 2018, 39(8): 3011-3019.
[3] 刘国明,陈泽钦,吴乐海. 堆石料Gudehus-Bauer亚塑性本构模型改进及参数确定方法[J]. , 2018, 39(3): 823-830.
[4] 李 舰,韦昌富,刘 艳,. 非饱和黏土状态相关本构模型的数值实现[J]. , 2017, 38(10): 2799-2808.
[5] 明华军 ,孙开畅 ,徐小峰 ,史存鹏,. 考虑颗粒破碎对特征孔隙比影响的堆石体亚塑性本构模型[J]. , 2016, 37(1): 33-40.
[6] 陈 龙,楚锡华,徐远杰. 基于CLoE亚塑性模型的密砂循环荷载下力学行为模拟[J]. , 2015, 36(6): 1598-1605.
[7] 刘 艳 ,韦昌富 ,房 倩 ,陈 盼,. 非饱和土水-力本构模型及其隐式积分算法[J]. , 2014, 299(2): 365-370.
[8] 陈 龙,楚锡华,张明龙,徐远杰. 基于CLoE与Gudehus-Bauer亚塑性模型的颗粒材料应变局部化对比研究[J]. , 2013, 34(11): 3306-3314.
[9] 袁小平,刘红岩,王志乔. 单轴压缩非贯通节理岩石尖端塑性区及弹塑性断裂模型研究[J]. , 2012, 33(6): 1679-1688.
[10] 黄文雄,杨红梅,李持庆. 利用旁压试验的砂土初始状态反演分析[J]. , 2012, 33(4): 979-985.
[11] 袁小平,刘红岩,王志乔. 基于Drucker-Prager准则的岩石弹塑性损伤本构模型研究[J]. , 2012, 33(4): 1103-1108.
[12] 冶小平,孙 强,王媛媛,李厚恩,薛 雷. 一种改进的粘土亚塑性本构模型[J]. , 2010, 31(4): 1099-1102.
[13] 楚锡华,徐远杰,张明龙,余 村. 基于ABAQUS的颗粒材料亚塑性模型的数值实现及探讨[J]. , 2009, 30(S1): 215-219.
[14] 周 雷,张洪武. 非饱和土化学-塑性耦合本构行为的数值模拟[J]. , 2009, 30(7): 2133-2140.
[15] 岑威钧,Erich Bauer,Sendy F . Tantono. 考虑湿化效应的堆石料Gudehus-Bauer 亚塑性模型应用研究[J]. , 2009, 30(12): 3808-3812.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!