›› 2018, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (S1): 395-404.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2017.2490

• 岩土工程研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于收敛–约束原理的大变形隧道初支更换时机优化研究

杨忠民1, 2,高永涛1, 2,吴顺川1,2,成子桥3   

  1. 1. 北京科技大学 土木与资源工程学院,北京100083;2. 北京科技大学 金属矿山高效开采与安全教育部重点实验室,北京 100083; 3. 中电建路桥集团有限公司,北京100048
  • 收稿日期:2017-12-14 出版日期:2018-07-20 发布日期:2018-09-02
  • 通讯作者: 高永涛,男,1962年生,博士,教授,博士生导师,主要从事岩土工程、采矿工程方面的教学与研究工作。E-mail: gaoyongtao@vip.sina.com E-mail:yangzhongmin2010@163.com
  • 作者简介:杨忠民,男,1988年生,博士研究生,主要从事隧道工程和采矿工程方面的研究工作。
  • 基金资助:

    科技北京百名领军人才培养工程(No. Z151100000315014)。

Optimization study of first liner replacement timing of large deformation tunnel based on convergence-constraint principle

YANG Zhong-min 1, 2, GAO Yong-tao 1, 2, WU Shun-chuan1,2, CHENG Zi-qiao 3   

  1. 1. School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Science and Technology Beijing, Beijing 100083, China; 2. Key Laboratory of Ministry of Education for Efficient Mining and Safety of Metal Mines, University of Science and Technology Beijing, Beijing 100083, China; 3.PowerChina Roadbridge Group Co., Ltd., Beijing 100048, China
  • Received:2017-12-14 Online:2018-07-20 Published:2018-09-02
  • Supported by:

    基金项目:科技北京百名领军人才培养工程(No. Z151100000315014)。 This work was supported by the Beijing Training Project for the Leading Talents in S & T (Z151100000315014).

摘要: 山岭隧道的建设无法完全避免大变形灾害,侵限后大变形初支更换时机不当不仅会延误工期,而且有可能导致隧道塌方等事故造成二次危害。以云南安企村1号隧道塌方事件为背景,基于收敛–约束原理,分析隧道发生大变形并施加临时钢支撑后围岩与支护相互作用的应力变化,得到围岩在初支及临时钢支撑作用下的应力–变形关系。利用离散元软件3DEC,分析了不同处治时机对大变形隧道围岩应力及岩块与节理破坏情况的影响。在模型隧道拱顶沉降达到最终位移(当拱顶沉降速率小于等于0.2 mm/d)的70%、75%、80%、85%、90%、95%、100%时进行变形初支更换,对重新平衡时隧道周围应力分布、岩块破坏量和节理破坏面积进行了统计。结果表明,拱顶沉降达到最终位移的90%时围岩应力与100%时基本相同;90%时换拱后重新达到稳定时节理破坏面积比在100%时换拱小,围岩应力与岩块破坏量与100%时基本相同,因此隧道大变形处治可以在围岩达到最终位移值前的一定范围时进行。研究结果不仅可以提高大变形处治过程的安全性,而且可以大大减少处治时间,具有重要的研究及施工参考价值。

关键词: 隧道大变形;收敛&ndash, 约束;离散元;处治时机

Abstract: The construction of mountain tunnel can not completely avoid the large deformation disaster. After tunnel invasion, the improper timing of the deformed first liner replacement will not only delay the construction period, but also possibly cause the secondary damage, such as tunnel collapse. Taking the collapse event of Anqicun No. 1 tunnel in Yunnan Province as the background, after the large deformation of the tunnel and the application of the temporary steel support, the stress curve and the stress-deformation relationship of the rock and support are analyzed based on the convergence-confinement principle. The influence of different treatment timing on the stress of rock and the failure of rock block and joint in large deformation tunnel is analyzed using the discrete element software 3DEC. In this model, the deformed first liner is replaced when the settlement of the tunnel reaches 70%, 75%, 80%, 85%, 90%, 95% and 100% of the final displacement(the displacement when the deformation rate less than or equal to 0.2 mm/d). Then, the stress distribution, the amount of rock destruction and the area of joint failure are statistically analyzed. The results show that when the displacement of the vault settlement reaches 90% of the final displacement, the rock stress is almost as same as it reaches 100%. After the deformed first liner replacement completed and the tunnel become stable, the joint destruction area when replace in 90% is less than replace at 100%, and the rock failure amount are almost the same as replace at 100%. Therefore, the treatment can be carried out before the displacement reaches the final displacement. This research can not only improve the safety of large deformation treatment process, but also greatly reduce the treatment time, which has important reference value for research and construction.

Key words: tunnel large deformation, convergence-constraint, discrete element, treatment timing

中图分类号: 

  • U 452

[1] 谷拴成,周 攀,黄荣宾. 锚杆–围岩承载结构支护下隧洞稳定性分析[J]. , 2018, 39(S1): 122-130.
[2] 李海丽,张陈蓉,卢 恺,. 隧道开挖条件下地埋管线的非线性响应分析[J]. , 2018, 39(S1): 289-296.
[3] 耿 哲,李树忱,赵世森,张靖宇. 泥水平衡盾构顶推力非线性动力学分析与应用研究[J]. , 2018, 39(S1): 469-476.
[4] 张玉伟,谢永利,李又云,赖金星,. 基于温度场时空分布特征的寒区隧道冻胀模型[J]. , 2018, 39(5): 1625-1632.
[5] 魏 纲,林 雄,金 睿,丁 智,. 双线盾构施工时邻近地下管线安全性判别[J]. , 2018, 39(1): 181-190.
[6] 刘天翔,王忠福, . 隧道正交穿越深厚滑坡体的相互影响分析与应对措施[J]. , 2018, 39(1): 265-274.
[7] 陈卫忠,马池帅,田洪铭,杨建平,. TBM隧道施工期岩爆预测方法探讨[J]. , 2017, 38(S2): 241-249.
[8] 黄晓康,卢坤林,朱大勇, . 盾构施工对不同位置地下管线变形的影响模拟试验研究[J]. , 2017, 38(S1): 123-130.
[9] 邓 琴,汤 华,吴振君,尹小涛,袁从华,. 隧道锚–围岩系统承载特性的室内模型试验及畸变纠正[J]. , 2017, 38(S1): 247-254.
[10] 叶 飞,宋 京,唐勇三,林剑飞,贾 涛,. 软弱围岩隧道掌子面及超前核心土挤出位移特征研究[J]. , 2017, 38(S1): 323-330.
[11] 郑 刚 ,张 涛,程雪松,刁 钰,. 天津地铁车站基坑立柱回弹的实测统计分析[J]. , 2017, 38(S1): 387-394.
[12] 张冬梅,高程鹏,尹振宇,王如路,杨天亮,. 隧道渗流侵蚀的颗粒流模拟[J]. , 2017, 38(S1): 429-438.
[13] 张妍珺,苏 凯,周 利,伍鹤皋. 基于收敛-约束法的隧洞纵向变形演化规律研究与支护时机估算[J]. , 2017, 38(S1): 471-478.
[14] 符亚鹏,姚志刚,方 勇,陈先国,. 隧道开挖对下伏水平薄煤层采空区地层的扰动及衬砌受荷特征[J]. , 2016, 37(S1): 117-125.
[15] 夏开宗,陈从新,付 华,郑 允,邓洋洋. 金属矿山崩落采矿法引起的岩层移动规律分析[J]. , 2016, 37(5): 1434-1440.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!