岩土力学 ›› 2019, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (10): 4011-4020.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2018.1077

• 岩土工程研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

L型挡土墙滑裂面确定方法与地震稳定性分析

张晓曦1, 2,何思明3,樊晓一1, 2   

  1. 1. 西南科技大学 土木工程与建筑学院,四川 绵阳 621010;2. 西南科技大学 工程材料与结构冲击振动四川省重点实验室,四川 绵阳 621000; 3. 中国科学院成都山地灾害与环境研究所 山地灾害与地表过程重点实验室,四川 成都 610041
  • 收稿日期:2018-06-21 出版日期:2019-10-11 发布日期:2019-10-20
  • 作者简介:张晓曦,男,1986年生,博士,讲师,主要从事岩土工程防灾减灾方向的研究。
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(No. 41877524);国家重点研发计划(No. 2018YFC1505401);西南科技大学博士基金(No.19zx7109)。

Seismic stability of L-shape retaining walls and determination method of sliding surface

ZHANG Xiao-xi1, 2, HE Si-ming3, FAN Xiao-yi1, 2   

  1. 1. School of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Southwest University of Science and Technology, Mianyang, Sichuan 621010, China; 2. Shock and Vibration of Engineering Materials and Structures Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, Southwest University of Science and Technology, Mianyarg, Sichuan 621000, China; 3. Key Laboratory of Mountain Hazards and Earth Surface Process, Institute of Mountain Hazards and Environment, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Chengdu, Sichuan 610041, China
  • Received:2018-06-21 Online:2019-10-11 Published:2019-10-20
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (41877524), the National Key Research and Development Program of China (2018YFC1505401) and the Doctoral Foundation of Southwest University of Science and Technology (19zx7109).

摘要: 提出了L型挡土墙两种破坏模式,即长踵板式和短踵板式,且破坏模式受几何参数和物理力学参数影响。研究了两种破坏模式下L型挡土墙滑裂面确定方法和地震稳定性问题,界定了两种破坏模式的临界条件。考虑第二、第三滑裂面产生条件,应用极限分析运动学原理,建立地震荷载作用下L型挡土墙临界状态方程,推导出地震加速度系数表达式。根据极值原理,给出最优解,从而计算得到临界屈服加速度系数及其对应的滑裂面倾角。通过算例分析可知:临界屈服加速度系数小于M-O公式法,长踵板式L型挡土墙滑裂面倾角与坦墙判别公式结果相同,且滑裂面之间的夹角等于90o-φ,即与滑移线场的结论相同。短踵板式L型挡土墙滑裂面夹角近似等于90o-φ。

关键词: L型挡土墙, 临界屈服加速度系数, 第二、第三滑裂面, 上限定理

Abstract: In this study, two seismic failure mechanisms of L-shape retaining walls (i.e., long heel failure and short heel failure) were presented, and the failure mechanisms were influenced by geometric parameters and physico-mechanical parameters. The seismic stability of L-shape retaining walls and the determination method of sliding surface were investigated in this paper, and the critical condition of two failure mechanisms was defined. Based on the kinematical approach of upper bound theorem, the critical state equation of L-shape retaining wall was established, taking account of the occurrence of the second and third sliding surfaces condition. Then the multivariate function to calculate seismic acceleration coefficient was derived and optimized by extremum principle, so as to obtain the critical yield acceleration factor and the inclination of sliding surface. A case study and comparative analysis showed that the critical yield acceleration factor was smaller than that derived from the M-O method. When the heel of L-shape retaining wall was long enough, the angle between two sliding surfaces equaled to 90°-φ. It means that the result of using this method is the same as the result of slip-line field theory. When the heel of L-shape retaining wall was short, the angle between sliding surfaces was approximately 90°-φ.

Key words: L-shape retaining wall, critical yield acceleration factor, the second and third sliding surface, upper bound theorem

中图分类号: 

  • TU475
[1] 刘克奇, 丁万涛, 陈瑞, 侯铭垒, . 盾构掌子面三维破坏模型构建与极限支护力计算[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(7): 2293-2303.
[2] 于丽, 吕城, 段儒禹, 王明年, . 考虑孔隙水压力及非线性Mohr-Coulomb破坏准则下浅埋土质隧道三维塌落机制的上限分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(1): 194-204.
[3] 孙志彬 ,杨小礼 ,张 胜 ,王路路,. Mohr-Coulomb准则下基于滑动面深度的边坡参数反分析方法[J]. , 2014, 35(5): 1323-1328.
[4] 杨昕光,迟世春. 土石坝坡抗震极限分析上限法[J]. , 2013, 34(3): 721-726.
[5] 赵炼恒 ,罗 强 ,李 亮 ,杨 峰 . 基于失稳状态耗能最小原理的预应力锚索加固边坡稳定性上限解析[J]. , 2013, 34(2): 426-432.
[6] 文畅平. 多级支挡结构地震主动土压力的极限分析[J]. , 2013, 34(11): 3205-3212.
[7] 文畅平. 多级支护边坡屈服加速度及因素敏感性分析[J]. , 2013, 34(10): 2889-2897.
[8] 何思明 ,张晓曦 ,吴 永. 基于上限定理的边坡潜在破裂面确定方法与稳定性判识研究[J]. , 2012, 33(1): 162-166.
[9] 黄 阜,杨小礼,赵炼恒,黄 戡. 基于Hoek-Brown破坏准则的浅埋条形锚板抗拔力上限分析[J]. , 2012, 33(1): 179-184.
[10] 谭捍华 ,赵炼恒 ,李 亮 ,罗 强. 抗滑桩预加固边坡的能量分析方法[J]. , 2011, 32(S2): 190-197.
[11] 乔金丽,张义同,高 健. 考虑渗流的多层土盾构隧道开挖面稳定性分析[J]. , 2010, 31(5): 1497-1502.
[12] 赵炼恒,罗 强,李 亮,但汉成,刘 项. 水平浅埋条形锚板极限抗拔力上限计算[J]. , 2010, 31(2): 516-522.
[13] 罗 强,赵炼恒,李 亮,谭捍华. 地震效应和坡顶超载对均质土坡稳定性影响的拟静力分析[J]. , 2010, 31(12): 3835-3841.
[14] 张国祥,付江山. 基于极限分析的圆形浅基础地基承载力上限解[J]. , 2010, 31(12): 3849-3854.
[15] 赵炼恒,罗 强,李 亮,杨 峰,但汉成. 层状岩体边坡动态稳定性拟静力上限分析[J]. , 2010, 31(11): 3627-3634.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!