岩土力学 ›› 2020, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (4): 1323-1332.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2019.0721

• 岩土工程研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

碎屑流高风险区桩群防护结构优化布局研究

王东坡1，李沁泽1，毕钰璋2，刘浩1   

  1. 1. 成都理工大学 地质灾害防治与地质环境保护国家重点实验室，四川 成都 610059；2. 东南大学 岩土工程研究所，南京 江苏 210096
  • 收稿日期:2019-04-21 修回日期:2019-08-14 出版日期:2020-04-11 发布日期:2020-07-01
  • 通讯作者: 毕钰璋，男，1990年生，博士研究生，主要从事滑坡、崩塌方面的研究工作。E-mail: biyuzhang@imde.ac.cn E-mail: wangdongpo2014@cdut.edu.cn
  • 作者简介:王东坡，男，1984年生，博士，副教授，主要从事山地灾害冲击动力学方面的研究工作。
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金（No. 41877266，No. 41790433）；国家重点研发计划（No. 2017YFC1501003）；地质灾害防治与地质环境保护国家重点实验室自主研究课题（No. SKLGP2019Z013）。

Optimal layout of a new type of baffle based on high-risk areas of rock avalanches

WANG Dong-po1, LI Qin-ze1, BI Yu-zhang2, LIU Hao1   

  1. 1. State Key Laboratory of Geohazard Prevention and Geoenvironment Protection, Chengdu University of Technology, Chengdu, Sichuan 610059, China; 2. Institute of Geotechnical Engineering, Southeast University, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210096, China
  • Received:2019-04-21 Revised:2019-08-14 Online:2020-04-11 Published:2020-07-01
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (41877266, 41790433), the National Key Research and Development Project of China (2017YFC1501003) and the State Key Laboratory of Geohazard Prevention and Geoenvironment Protection Independent Research Project (SKLGP2019Z013).

PDF (Chinese)

143

摘要： 桩群是一种可有效耗散碎屑流运动能量，抑制碎屑流运动距离及速度的山地灾害防护结构。在碎屑流沟口与受灾体之间构建一组桩群减速带，可达到保护受灾体的目的。以物理模型试验为基础，开展弧型桩群、方型桩群和圆型桩群的沟槽型碎屑流冲击动力响应研究。讨论了3种不同类型的桩群对沟槽型碎屑流运动形态的影响，进一步开展弧型桩群的结构优化研究。结果表明：采用桩群结构可有效减小沟槽型碎屑流堆积距离并抑制其运动速度；3种不同形状桩群之间，弧型桩与方型桩的拦挡效果明显优于圆型桩；弧型桩由于凹槽式外型，对沟槽型碎屑流堆积面积、淤埋深度的抑制效果稍优于方型桩；在相同高度、直径等几何参数下，弧型桩体积比圆型桩小22.6%，比方型桩小39.2%，因此弧型桩的制作成本也相对较低；弧型桩排数从1排增加到3排，桩群拦挡率分别提升7.2%、4.5%；适量增加槽口与桩之间距离Ld可以有效提高弧型桩群防护结构的能量耗散效率。该研究可为桩群在沟槽型碎屑流防治工程中的应用提供理论及技术支持。

关键词: 沟槽型碎屑流, 桩群, 弧型桩, 优化布局, 拦挡效果

Abstract: The baffle, as a kind of mountain disaster protection structure, can effectively dissipate the movement energy of rock avalanches and restrain the movement distance and speed of rock avalanches. The construction of a baffle’s speed bumps between the rock avalanches gully and the disaster zone can greatly protect the disaster zone. In this study, based on the physical model experiment, the dynamic impact response of the channelled rock avalanches is implemented on the arc-shaped, square and cylindrical baffles. The effects of three types of baffles on the motion performance of channelled rock avalanches are discussed, and the structural optimisation of the arc-shaped baffles is further investigated. The results show that the baffles can effectively reduce the channelled rock avalanches accumulation distance and control the movement speed. Among the baffles of these three shapes, the blocking effect of the arc-shaped baffles and the square baffles is more efficient than that of the cylindrical baffles. Owing to the concave shape of the arc-shaped baffles, the blocking effect is much better than that of square baffles on the deposit areas and deposit depth. At the same height and diameter, the arc-shaped baffle volume has 22.6% and 39.2% less than the cylindrical baffle and the square baffle, respectively. Thus, the production cost of the arc-shaped baffle is lower than another two baffles. When the row of the arc-shaped baffles is increased from one to three, its blocking rate is increased from 7.2% to 4.5% as well. An appropriate increase in Ld can improve the energy dissipation efficiency of the arc-shaped baffles. This can provide theoretical and technical support for the application of pile groups in channelled rock avalanches control engineering.

Key words: channelled rock avalanches, baffles system, arc-shaped baffles, optimal layout, blocking effect

中图分类号: 

  • TU 473
[1] 费康, 朱志慧, 石雨恒, 周莹. 能量桩群桩工作特性简化分析方法研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(12): 3889-3898.
[2] 刘林超，闫启方，闫 盼. 考虑三维波动的饱和土中管桩群桩的水平振动研究[J]. , 2017, 38(10): 2817-2825.
[3] 孔令刚，张利民. 群桩扭转非线性模型[J]. , 2009, 30(8): 2231-2236.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 徐金明,羌培,张鹏飞. 粉质黏土图像的纹理特征分析[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2903 -2907 .
[2] 杜佐龙，黄茂松，李 早. 基于地层损失比的隧道开挖对临近群桩影响的DCM方法[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 3043 -3047 .
[3] 刘 晓，唐辉明，罗红明，陈守义. 对滑坡防治工程相关规范中渗流问题的研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 3173 -3180 .
[4] 祝云华，刘新荣，舒志乐. 对“‘深埋隧道开挖围岩失稳突变模型研究’讨论”的答复[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 3215 -3216 .
[5] 贾宇峰，迟世春，林 皋. 考虑颗粒破碎影响的粗粒土本构模型[J]. , 2009, 30(11): 3261 -3266 .
[6] 王星华，章 敏，王随新. 考虑渗流及软化的海底隧道围岩弹塑性分析[J]. , 2009, 30(11): 3267 -3272 .
[7] 翟聚云，卫国祥. 干密度对非饱和膨胀土水分迁移参数的影响[J]. , 2009, 30(11): 3337 -3341 .
[8] 蔚立元，李术才，徐帮树. 舟山灌门水道海底隧道钻爆法施工稳定性分析[J]. , 2009, 30(11): 3453 -3459 .
[9] 李利平，李术才，崔金声. 岩溶突水治理浆材的试验研究[J]. , 2009, 30(12): 3642 -3648 .
[10] 赵明华，张 玲，曹文贵，马缤辉. 基于弹性地基梁理论的土工格室加筋体变形分析[J]. , 2009, 30(12): 3695 -3699 .
版权所有 © 《岩土力学》编辑部
地址：湖北武汉武昌小洪山中国科学院武汉岩土力学研究所(430071)　邮编：200042　电话：027-87198484, 87199252, 87199253, 87198752　E-mail: ytlx@whrsm.ac.cn
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发