岩土力学 ›› 2020, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (5): 1699-1708.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2019.0729

• 岩土工程研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

真空负压静力试桩方法关键技术试验研究

史永跃1,王奎华2,董天文3,马显春1,黄永威1   

  1. 1. 中铁西南科学研究院有限公司,四川 成都 611731;2. 浙江大学 滨海与城市岩土工程研究中心,浙江 杭州 310058; 3. 辽宁工程技术大学 土木工程学院,辽宁 阜新 123000
  • 收稿日期:2019-04-22 修回日期:2019-09-08 出版日期:2020-05-11 发布日期:2020-07-07
  • 作者简介:史永跃,男,1975年生,博士,高级工程师,主要从事岩土工程施工、检测与研究工作。
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金面上项目(No. 51579217,No. 51779217)

Study of key technologies of vacuum negative-pressure static pile load test

SHI Yong-yue1, WANG Kui-hua2, DONG Tian-wen3, MA Xian-chun1, HUANG Yong-wei1   

  1. 1. China Railway Southwest Research Institute Co., Ltd., Chengdu, Sichuan 611731, China; 2. Research Center of Coastal and Urban Geotechnical Engineering,Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310058, China ; 3. School of Civil Engineering,Liaoning Technical University, Fuxin, Liaoning 123000, China
  • Received:2019-04-22 Revised:2019-09-08 Online:2020-05-11 Published:2020-07-07
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the General Program of National Natural Science Foundation of China (51579217, 51779217).

摘要: 现有的静力试桩方法主要有堆载法、锚桩反力架法和自平衡法3种,且各自都存在明显的不足。为了弥补传统基桩静载试验的不足,设计并加工了一套能在工程实践中应用的真空负压静力试桩的反力装置,并进行了原型桩堆载和真空负压静载试验。在试桩上安设了钢筋应力计、桩底土压力盒和桩底位移杆监测传感器及装置,借鉴了地基真空预压排水预压密封系统的措施,形成了有效的密封反力系统。分析了试桩在加载过程中的荷载-位移(Q-s)曲线、位移-时间(s-lgt)曲线,以及轴力、桩侧摩阻力和桩端摩阻力的分布规律。试验表明,桩侧摩阻力的发挥与抽真空过程密切相关。由于负压平台的刚度、压力传递和密封效果原因,真空负压最大加载量级与理论值存在一定差距,针对上述问题提出了相应的解决方案和改进措施。

关键词: 真空负压静力试桩, Q-s曲线, 钢筋应力计, 土压力盒, 密封反力系统

Abstract: The conventional static pile load testing methods include Kentledge, reaction piles and bi-directional methods, whereas each of these methods has inevitable disadvantages. A vacuum static load testing is developed to avoid the disadvantages of these traditional methods. A set of reaction devices is designed for vacuum negative-pressure static pile load test, which can be used in engineering practice. Pile foundation loading and vacuum negative-pressure static load tests were carried out. Vibrating wire rebar stress meters, earth pressure cells and displacement bar monitoring sensors are installed on the pile. The effective sealing reaction system is formed by referring to the measures of foundation vacuum preloading drainage preloading sealing system. The Q-s curve, s-lgt curve, the distribution of axial force, lateral resistance and terminal resistance in the loading process of the tested pile are analyzed. The tests show that the response of lateral friction of the pile is closely related to the vacuum pumping process. Due to the stiffness, pressure transfer and sealing effect of the negative pressure platform, there is a certain gap in the maximum loading magnitude between the vacuum negative-pressure and the related theoretical value. The corresponding solutions and improvement measures are proposed for the above problems.

Key words: vacuum static pile load test, Q-s curve, vibrating wire rebar stress meter, earth pressure cell, sealing reaction system

中图分类号: 

  • TU 473
[1] 梁 波, 厉彦君, 凌学鹏, 赵宁雨, 张青松, . 离心模型试验中微型土压力盒土压力测定[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(2): 818-826.
[2] 李顺群,夏锦红,王杏杏,. 一种三维土压力盒的工作原理及其应用[J]. , 2016, 37(S2): 337-342.
[3] 王 成,林 胜,李晓红. 超长群桩的模型试验研究[J]. , 2007, 28(S1): 74-78.
[4] 徐光明 ,陈爱忠 ,曾友金 ,顾行文 ,蔡正银 . 超重力场中界面土压力的测量[J]. , 2007, 28(12): 2671-2674.
[5] 曹文贵,张永杰,赵明华. 基桩极限承载力的改进变步长灰色预测模型研究[J]. , 2006, 27(S1): 774-778.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 刘振平,贺怀建,李 强,朱发华. 基于Python的三维建模可视化系统的研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 3037 -3042 .
[2] 崔皓东,朱岳明. 二滩高拱坝坝基渗流场的反演分析[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 3194 -3199 .
[3] 赵成刚,蔡国庆. 非饱和土广义有效应力原理[J]. , 2009, 30(11): 3232 -3236 .
[4] 刘小文,常立君,胡小荣. 非饱和红土基质吸力与含水率及密度关系试验研究[J]. , 2009, 30(11): 3302 -3306 .
[5] 张文杰,陈云敏,邱战洪. 垃圾土渗透性和持水性的试验研究[J]. , 2009, 30(11): 3313 -3317 .
[6] 刘 晓,唐辉明,刘 瑜. 基于集对分析和模糊马尔可夫链的滑坡变形预测新方法研究[J]. , 2009, 30(11): 3399 -3405 .
[7] 卢 正,姚海林,骆行文,胡梦玲. 矩形移动荷载作用下路面-双层地基系统三维振动分析[J]. , 2009, 30(11): 3493 -3499 .
[8] 贾 强,张 鑫,应惠清. 桩基础托换开发地下空间不均匀沉降的数值分析[J]. , 2009, 30(11): 3500 -3504 .
[9] 杨建平,陈卫忠,田洪铭,于洪丹. 应力-温度对低渗透介质渗透率影响研究[J]. , 2009, 30(12): 3587 -3594 .
[10] 顾强康,李 宁,黄文广. 机场高填土地基工后不均匀沉降指标研究[J]. , 2009, 30(12): 3865 -3870 .