岩土力学 ›› 2021, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (12): 3485-3496.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2021.0485

• 数值分析 • 上一篇    

管状地下结构对软土场地浅埋筏式基础震陷影响规律模拟研究

汪云龙1,王进1, 2,袁晓铭1,马佳钧1   

  1. 1. 中国地震局工程力学研究所 中国地震局地震工程与工程振动重点实验室,黑龙江 哈尔滨 150080; 2. 广西交通职业技术学院,广西 南宁 530015
  • 收稿日期:2021-04-05 修回日期:2021-08-14 出版日期:2021-12-13 发布日期:2021-12-14
  • 通讯作者: 袁晓铭,男,1963年生,博士,研究员,博士生导师,主要从事波动理论、地震岩土工程、土动力学等方面的研究工作。E-mail: yxmiem@163.com E-mail:wyl_iem@hotmail.com
  • 作者简介:汪云龙,男,1985年生,博士,副研究员,主要从事岩土地震工程、土工测试及地质勘查等方面的研究工作。
  • 基金资助:
    中国地震局工程力学研究所基本科研业务费专项(No.2020B01);黑龙江省自然科学基金(No.ZD2019E009)

Numerical investigation on the influence of underground tubular structure on seismic subsidence of shallow raft foundation in soft soil site

WANG Yun-long1, WANG Jin1, 2, YUAN Xiao-ming1, MA Jia-jun1   

  1. 1. Key Laboratory of Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration of China Earthquake Administration, Institute of Engineering Mechanics, China Earthquake Administration, Harbin, Heilongjiang 150080, China; 2. Vocational and Technical College of Communications, Nanning, Guangxi 530015, China
  • Received:2021-04-05 Revised:2021-08-14 Online:2021-12-13 Published:2021-12-14
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the Scentific Research Fund of Institute of Engineering Mechanics of China Earthquake Administration(2020B01) and the Heilongjiang Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China(ZD2019E009).

摘要: 为探究软土场地内管状地下结构对浅埋筏形基础震陷的影响规律,基于FLAC3D有限差分分析平台及振动软化模型建立了筏式浅基础软土震陷分析方法,通过对比1976年唐山地震中天津塘沽新港地区典型房屋基础的软土震陷震害模拟值结果与实测值验证了该方法的合理性。建模分析不同埋藏条件和截面尺寸的方形(为例)截面管状地下结构对筏式浅基础结构震陷影响规律。研究指出,管状地下结构对自重较轻上部结构的基础震陷的影响更加显著,影响厂房类结构的设计与建造;震陷随着管状地下结构截面相对尺寸的增大而减小,超过地基宽度后会趋于稳定;震陷随着管状地下结构埋藏深度的增加而增加,最终会趋于没有地下结构的结果;震陷随着管状地下结构与房屋埋设距离的增加先增大后减小;从震陷控制角度,管状地下结构选线需要控制与既有建筑的距离。

关键词: 软土震陷, 振动软化模型, 浅埋筏形基础, 管状地下结构, FLAC3D模型

Abstract: To study the influence of the underground tubular structure on the seismic subsidence of shallow raft foundations in the soft soil site, a method for analyzing the seismic subsidence of the shallow raft foundation in soft soil was established based on the FLAC3D finite difference analysis platform and vibration softening model. By comparing the simulated and measured values of seismic subsidence and damage of typical building foundations in soft soil of Tanggu Port in Tianjin during 1976 Tangshan earthquake, the rationality of the proposed method was verified. Numerical simulation was carried out for analyzing the influence of different burial conditions and cross-sectional dimensions of square-sectional (for example) underground tubular structures on seismic subsidence of shallow raft foundation. Results show that the underground tubular structure has a more significant impact on the seismic subsidence of the superstructure with a lighter self-weight, affecting the design and construction of workshop structure. The seismic subsidence decreases with the increase of the relative size of the underground tubular structure, and tends to be steady after it exceeds the width of the foundation. Seismic subsidence increases with the increase of the burial depth of the underground tubular structure, and eventually tends to be the result without underground tubular structures. The seismic subsidence initially increases with the increase of the burial distance between the underground tubular structure and building, and decreases afterwards. In terms of seismic subsidence control, the distance from the underground tubular structure to the existing building needs to be controlled.

Key words: soft clay seismic subsidence, vibration-induced softening model, shallow raft foundation, underground tubular structure, FLAC3D numerical model

中图分类号: 

  • TU476
[1] 朱 宁,周 洋,刘 维,史培新,吴 奔, . 苏州粉土地层地连墙施工对地层扰动影响研究[J]. , 2018, 39(S1): 529-536.
[2] 阮长青,屠毓敏,俞亚南. 齿坎式挡土结构物极限抗滑力研究[J]. , 2010, 31(8): 2514-2518.
[3] 雷国辉 ,詹金林 ,洪 鑫 ,施建勇 . 水平受荷壁板桩群桩的变分法分析[J]. , 2008, 29(2): 303-309.
[4] 李 铀,白世伟,方昭茹,朱维申,杨春和. 预应力锚索锚固体破坏与锚固力传递模式研究[J]. , 2003, 24(5): 686-690.
[5] 薛亚东,黄宏伟. 水对树脂锚索锚固性能影响的试验研究[J]. , 2005, 26(S1): 31-34.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 姚仰平,侯 伟. 土的基本力学特性及其弹塑性描述[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2881 -2902 .
[2] 徐金明,羌培,张鹏飞. 粉质黏土图像的纹理特征分析[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2903 -2907 .
[3] 向天兵,冯夏庭,陈炳瑞,江 权,张传庆. 三向应力状态下单结构面岩石试样破坏机制与真三轴试验研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2908 -2916 .
[4] 石玉玲,门玉明,彭建兵,黄强兵,刘洪佳. 地裂缝对不同结构形式桥梁桥面的破坏试验研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2917 -2922 .
[5] 夏栋舟,何益斌,刘建华. 土-结构动力相互作用体系阻尼及地震反应分析[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2923 -2928 .
[6] 徐速超,冯夏庭,陈炳瑞. 矽卡岩单轴循环加卸载试验及声发射特性研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2929 -2934 .
[7] 张力霆,齐清兰,魏静,霍倩,周国斌. 淤填黏土固结过程中孔隙比的变化规律[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2935 -2939 .
[8] 张其一. 复合加载模式下地基失效机制研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2940 -2944 .
[9] 易 俊,姜永东,鲜学福,罗 云,张 瑜. 声场促进煤层气渗流的应力-温度-渗流压力场的流固动态耦合模型[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2945 -2949 .
[10] 陶干强,杨仕教,任凤玉. 崩落矿岩散粒体流动性能试验研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2950 -2954 .