岩土力学 ›› 2022, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (8): 2296-2304.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2021.1767

• 岩土工程研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

非对称荷载单层对撑基坑计算方法研究

阮升1, 2,金亚兵3,徐晶鑫1, 2,孙勇1, 2   

  1. 1. 贵州大学 喀斯特环境与地质灾害教育部重点实验室,贵州 贵阳 550033; 2. 贵州大学 资源与环境工程学院,贵州 贵阳550033;3. 深圳市地质局,广东 深圳 518023
  • 收稿日期:2021-10-21 修回日期:2022-03-21 出版日期:2022-08-11 发布日期:2022-08-19
  • 通讯作者: 孙勇,男,1963年生,博士,教授,主要从事岩土工程和结构工程的设计、教学与研究工作。E-mail: sunyong00188@163.com E-mail:2314236357@qq.com
  • 作者简介:阮升,男,1997年生,硕士研究生,主要从事岩土工程方面的设计和研究工作。
  • 基金资助:
    广东省深圳市地质局地质工程院士工作站专项经费资助项目(No. 2013B090400025)

A calculation method of single-layer opposite bracing foundation pit under asymmetric load

RUAN Sheng1, 2, JIN Ya-bing3, XU Jing-xin1, 2, SUN Yong1, 2   

  1. 1. Key Laboratory of Karst Environment and Geological Hazard Prevention of Ministry of Education, Guizhou University, Guiyang, Guizhou 550003, China; 2. College of Resources and Environmental Engineering, Guizhou University, Guiyang, Guizhou 550003, China; 3. Shenzhen Geology Bureau, Shenzhen, Guangdong 518023 China
  • Received:2021-10-21 Revised:2022-03-21 Online:2022-08-11 Published:2022-08-19
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the Academician Workstation of Geological Engineering of Shenzhen Geological Bureau of Guangdong Province (2013B090400025).

摘要: 支护桩(墙)加内支撑作为基坑支护的一种重要型式,已经被基坑支护工程广泛采用。但是,由于基坑所处地质条件、周围环境和土方开挖的复杂性,给基坑支护体系的精准设计计算带来障碍。对非对称荷载作用下的单层内支撑支护设计计算方法进行了探讨。首先,基于极限土压力法分析了单层内支撑与支护桩支点铰接和固结条件下的不动点调整系数的差异性;其次,利用杆系有限单元法分析了基于位移土压力和基于《规程》给出的主动土压力这两种土压力方法计算的桩身位移、弯矩和剪力的差异性。由于非对称荷载作用于基坑支护体系,引起荷载大小侧支护桩桩身位移不同,导致荷载大小侧支护桩受到的土压力也不同,大小侧支护桩桩身内力存在较大差异现象应引起重视。提出的不动点调整系数计算方法和位移土压力计算支护桩受到的土压力计算方法更为合理。

关键词: 非对称荷载, 对撑, 不动点调整系数, 极限土压力, 位移土压力, 杆系有限单元法

Abstract: The retaining pile plus internal support structure has been widely used in foundation pit support engineering. Due to the complexity of geological condition, surrounding environment and earth excavation, however, it brings obstacles to the accurate design and calculation of foundation pit support system. This paper discusses the design and calculation method of single-layer internal support system under asymmetric load. Firstly, the difference of fixed point adjustment coefficient under articulated and fixed conditions between single-layer internal support and retaining pile is analyzed based on ultimate earth pressure method. Secondly, by using finite rod element method, the differences of pile shaft displacement, pile bending moment and pile shear estimated by two methods, i.e., earth pressure considering displacement by Terzaghi, and active earth pressure based on Chinese technical regulations for the support of building foundation pits. Due to the asymmetric load acting on the foundation pit support system, the displacement of the support piles on the side bearing large load and the side bearing small load are different, resulting in the different earth pressure on the support piles on the side bearing large load and the side bearing small load. The phenomenon of large difference in the internal force of the support pile shaft on the large and small sides should be paid attention to. The calculation methods of fixed point adjustment coefficient and displacement earth pressure proposed in this paper are more reasonable.

Key words: asymmetric load, opposite bracing, fixed point adjustment coefficient, limit earth pressure, earth pressure considering displacement, finite rod element method

中图分类号: 

  • TU 473
[1] 张 淼 ,邹金锋 ,陈嘉祺 ,李 亮 ,李振存 . 非对称荷载作用下土体劈裂注浆压力分析[J]. , 2013, 34(8): 2255-2263.
[2] 朱彦鹏,李元勋. 混合法在深基坑排桩锚杆支护计算中的应用研究[J]. , 2013, 34(5): 1416-1420.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 姚仰平,侯 伟. 土的基本力学特性及其弹塑性描述[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2881 -2902 .
[2] 徐金明,羌培,张鹏飞. 粉质黏土图像的纹理特征分析[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2903 -2907 .
[3] 向天兵,冯夏庭,陈炳瑞,江 权,张传庆. 三向应力状态下单结构面岩石试样破坏机制与真三轴试验研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2908 -2916 .
[4] 石玉玲,门玉明,彭建兵,黄强兵,刘洪佳. 地裂缝对不同结构形式桥梁桥面的破坏试验研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2917 -2922 .
[5] 夏栋舟,何益斌,刘建华. 土-结构动力相互作用体系阻尼及地震反应分析[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2923 -2928 .
[6] 徐速超,冯夏庭,陈炳瑞. 矽卡岩单轴循环加卸载试验及声发射特性研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2929 -2934 .
[7] 张力霆,齐清兰,魏静,霍倩,周国斌. 淤填黏土固结过程中孔隙比的变化规律[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2935 -2939 .
[8] 张其一. 复合加载模式下地基失效机制研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2940 -2944 .
[9] 易 俊,姜永东,鲜学福,罗 云,张 瑜. 声场促进煤层气渗流的应力-温度-渗流压力场的流固动态耦合模型[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2945 -2949 .
[10] 陶干强,杨仕教,任凤玉. 崩落矿岩散粒体流动性能试验研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2950 -2954 .