岩土力学 ›› 2022, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (11): 3127-3134.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2022.0049

• 岩土工程研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

力量速度法和力量平方法量测动力 触探锤击能试验研究

沈志平,刘慧,付君宜,孙秀东   

  1. 贵州正业工程技术投资有限公司,贵州 贵阳 550001
  • 收稿日期:2022-01-10 修回日期:2022-08-18 出版日期:2022-11-11 发布日期:2022-11-29
  • 作者简介:沈志平,男,1960年生,本科,高级工程师,主要从事高填方地基处理、边坡稳定性等方面的研究。
  • 基金资助:
    贵州省科技支撑计划项目(黔科合支撑[2020]3Y005号);贵州省科研机构创新能力建设专项资金项目(黔科合服企[2019]4003);中央引导地方科技发展资金项目(黔科中引地[2021]4001)

Experimental study on the measurement of dynamic penetration test hammer impacting energy by force-velocity method and force square method

SHEN Zhi-ping, LIU Hui, FU Jun-yi, SUN Xiu-dong   

  1. Guizhou Zhengye Engineering & Technology Investment Co., Ltd, Guiyang, Guizhou 550001, China
  • Received:2022-01-10 Revised:2022-08-18 Online:2022-11-11 Published:2022-11-29
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the Science and Technology Support Program of Guizhou Province (Qiankehe Support [2020]3Y005), the Special Fund Project for Innovation Capacity Construction of Scientific Research Institutions in Guizhou Province (Qiankehe Enterprise Serviced [2019]4003) and the Central Government Guided Local Science and Technology Development Fund Project (Qianke Central Guided Local [2021]4001).

摘要: 动力触探指标修正、试验稳定性、锤击数转化关系与有效锤击能密切相关。在探杆杆顶处和探头处安装应变片和加速度传感器,量测不同探杆长度下的重型、超重型动力触探锤击能。结果表明:当探杆中单个探杆较短、接头数多时,使用积分域为(0、2 lc)的力量平方法(F2法)计算所得探杆锤击能与实际锤击能相差较大(为探杆长度,为波的传播速度)。由于原位试验时干扰因素过多,力量速度法(FV法)选取首个极值和F2法选取锤击轴力首次穿过0点时作为锤击能量的积分结束时间计算锤击能更为合理。随着探杆长度的增大,达到探头处的锤击能量呈线性减小。3、5、8、11 m杆长下的重型和超重型锤击数转化系数分别为2.285、2.160、2.440、2.810,与超重型和重型的总势能比基本一致。

关键词: 动力触探, 能量测试, 力量平方法, 力量速度法, 轴向冲击力

Abstract:

The dynamic penetration index correction, test stability and relationship of blow-counts are closely related to the effective hammer impacting energy. Strain gauges and acceleration sensors were installed at the top of the probe rod and the probe, and the hammer energy of heavy and super-heavy dynamic penetration under different probe rod lengths was measured. The results show that when the single probe rod in the probe rod is short and there are many joints, the hammer energy of the probe rod calculated by the force square method (F2 method) with an integral domain of (0, 2l/c) differs greatly from the actual hammering energy, where l is probe rod length, c is wave velocity. Due to too many interference factors in the in-situ test, it is more reasonable to the force velocity method (FV method) that selects the first extreme value and the F2 method selects the time when the hammering axial force first passes through the zero point as the integral end time of hammering energy to calculate the hammering energy. As the length of the probe rod increases, the hammer energy reaching the probe decreases linearly. Blow-count converting coefficients for heavy and super-heavy hammer numbers under the rod lengths of 3, 5, 8 m, and 11 m are 2.285, 2.160, 2.440, and 2.810, respectively, which are basically consistent with the total potential energy ratio of super-heavy and heavy hammer.

Key words: dynamic penetration test, energy measurement, force-velocity method, force square method, axial impacting force

中图分类号: 

  • TU 443
[1] 林澜, 李飒, 孙立强, 刘小龙, 陈文炜, . 基于动力触探的钙质土相对密实度研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(8): 2730-2738.
[2] 左永振,程展林,丁红顺,廖建辉. 动力触探杆长修正系数试验研究[J]. , 2014, 35(5): 1284-1288.
[3] 年廷凯,李鸿江,杨 庆,陈允进,王玉立. 沿海下卧软弱夹层碎石回填地基15 000 kN•m 高能级强夯试验[J]. , 2010, 31(3): 689-694.
[4] 田卿燕,刘仰韶,吕建兵. 轻型动力触探法与静力触探法检测粗砂相对密实度的相关性研究[J]. , 2009, 30(9): 2747-2752.
[5] 王四巍,王忠福,刘汉东,高丹盈. 京珠高速许漯段路基干拌水泥碎石桩加固研究[J]. , 2009, 30(5): 1421-1424.
[6] 候兰杰,陈兴长,陈 慧,崔春龙. 表面波法确定卵石土地基承载力模型研究[J]. , 2008, 29(9): 2572-2576.
[7] 李德吉,杨光华,陈 夫,杜秀忠,李思平. 阳江核电站水库振冲碎石桩试验研究[J]. , 2006, 27(S2): 921-924.
[8] 王祎望 ,王仁刚 ,闫韶兵,. 动刚度和动力触探在强夯地基检测中的应用[J]. , 2004, 25(5): 839-842.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 姚仰平,侯 伟. 土的基本力学特性及其弹塑性描述[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2881 -2902 .
[2] 徐金明,羌培,张鹏飞. 粉质黏土图像的纹理特征分析[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2903 -2907 .
[3] 向天兵,冯夏庭,陈炳瑞,江 权,张传庆. 三向应力状态下单结构面岩石试样破坏机制与真三轴试验研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2908 -2916 .
[4] 石玉玲,门玉明,彭建兵,黄强兵,刘洪佳. 地裂缝对不同结构形式桥梁桥面的破坏试验研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2917 -2922 .
[5] 夏栋舟,何益斌,刘建华. 土-结构动力相互作用体系阻尼及地震反应分析[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2923 -2928 .
[6] 徐速超,冯夏庭,陈炳瑞. 矽卡岩单轴循环加卸载试验及声发射特性研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2929 -2934 .
[7] 张力霆,齐清兰,魏静,霍倩,周国斌. 淤填黏土固结过程中孔隙比的变化规律[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2935 -2939 .
[8] 张其一. 复合加载模式下地基失效机制研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2940 -2944 .
[9] 易 俊,姜永东,鲜学福,罗 云,张 瑜. 声场促进煤层气渗流的应力-温度-渗流压力场的流固动态耦合模型[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2945 -2949 .
[10] 陶干强,杨仕教,任凤玉. 崩落矿岩散粒体流动性能试验研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2950 -2954 .