岩土力学 ›› 2023, Vol. 44 ›› Issue (6): 1789-1799.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2022.1683

• 岩土工程研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于LightGBM的超大沉井下沉状态预测及传感器优化布置

董学超1, 2,郭明伟1, 2,王水林1, 2   

  1. 1. 中国科学院武汉岩土力学研究所 岩土力学与工程国家重点实验室,湖北 武汉 430071;2. 中国科学院大学,北京 100049
  • 收稿日期:2022-10-26 接受日期:2022-12-09 出版日期:2023-06-14 发布日期:2023-06-17
  • 通讯作者: 郭明伟,男,1981年生,博士,副研究员,硕士生导师,主要从事计算岩土力学方面的研究工作。E-mail: mwguo@whrsm.ac.cn E-mail:dongxuechao18@mails.ucas.ac.cn
  • 作者简介:董学超,男,1996年生,博士研究生,主要从事计算岩土力学方面的研究工作。
  • 基金资助:
    2019年度交通运输行业重点科技项目(No.2019-MS1-011)。

Sinking state prediction and optimal sensor placement of super large open caissons based on LightGBM

DONG Xue-chao1, 2, GUO Ming-wei1, 2, WANG Shui-lin1, 2   

  1. 1. State Key Laboratory of Geomechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, Institute of Rock and Soil Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan, Hubei 430071, China; 2. University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
  • Received:2022-10-26 Accepted:2022-12-09 Online:2023-06-14 Published:2023-06-17
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the Scientific and Technological Key Projects in Transportation Industry 2019(2019-MS1-011).

摘要: 沉井下沉状态预测及传感器优化布置有利于确保沉井安全平稳下沉、降低监测成本。基于机器学习中的LightGBM框架建立超大沉井下沉状态预测模型,利用沉井底部结构应力传感器监测数据,准确预测沉井下沉速度、横桥向高差和顺桥向高差,并通过传感器重要程度分析,提出可满足下沉状态预测精度的传感器优化布置方案。将提出的沉井下沉状态预测模型和传感器优化布置方法应用于常泰长江大桥主塔超大沉井下沉工程,结果表明:沉井下沉预测时,3个预测指标的R2均大于0.94,下沉状态预测精度高;对下沉状态预测较为重要的传感器主要集中在沉井外圈和横纵轴线附近区域;在满足下沉状态预测精度的条件下,传感器优化布置方案可减少传感器数量达45.5%。优化布置方案包含的传感器数量相同时,提出的优化布置方案在下沉状态预测精度方面整体优于基于特征变量相关性分析的优化布置方案。

关键词: 超大沉井, 下沉状态预测, 传感器优化布置, LightGBM, 机器学习, 特征重要性

Abstract: The sinking state prediction and optimal sensor placement are conducive to ensuring safe and steady sinking of open caissons and reducing monitoring costs. Based on LightGBM, a framework in the field of machine learning, a sinking state prediction model of super large open caisson is established. By using the monitoring data of the stress sensors at the bottom of the open caisson, the sinking speed of the open caisson, the height difference in the transverse direction and the height difference along the bridge direction are accurately predicted. Through the analysis of the sensor importance, the optimal sensor placement scheme that can meet the sinking state prediction accuracy is determined. The proposed sinking state prediction model and the optimal sensor placement method were applied to the super large open caisson sinking project of the main tower of Changtai Yangtze River Bridge. The results show that the model has high accuracy in predicting the sinking state of the open caisson, and the R2 of the three prediction indexes is greater than 0.94. The important sensors for predicting the sinking state are mainly concentrated in the outer circle of the open caisson and the area near the transverse and longitudinal axes. Under the condition of satisfying the prediction accuracy of sinking state, the optimal sensor placement scheme can reduce the number of sensors by 45.5%. When the numbers of sensors in the optimal sensor placement schemes are same, the proposed optimization scheme is better than the scheme based on the correlation analysis of characteristic variables in terms of overall accuracy of sinking state prediction.

Key words: super large open caisson, sinking state prediction, optimal sensor placement, LightGBM, machine learning, feature importance

中图分类号: 

  • U446.2
[1] 仉文岗, 顾鑫, 刘汉龙, 张青, 王林, 王鲁琦, . 基于贝叶斯更新的非饱和土坡参数概率 反演及变形预测[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(4): 1112-1122.
[2] 苏国韶,张克实,吕海波. 位移反分析的粒子群优化-高斯过程协同优化方法[J]. , 2011, 32(2): 510-515.
[3] 徐 冲,刘保国,刘开云,郭佳奇. 基于组合核函数的高斯过程边坡角智能设计[J]. , 2010, 31(3): 821-826.
[4] 苏国韶,宋咏春,燕柳斌. 高斯过程机器学习在边坡稳定性评价中的应用[J]. , 2009, 30(3): 675-679.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 姚仰平,侯 伟. 土的基本力学特性及其弹塑性描述[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2881 -2902 .
[2] 徐金明,羌培,张鹏飞. 粉质黏土图像的纹理特征分析[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2903 -2907 .
[3] 向天兵,冯夏庭,陈炳瑞,江 权,张传庆. 三向应力状态下单结构面岩石试样破坏机制与真三轴试验研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2908 -2916 .
[4] 石玉玲,门玉明,彭建兵,黄强兵,刘洪佳. 地裂缝对不同结构形式桥梁桥面的破坏试验研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2917 -2922 .
[5] 夏栋舟,何益斌,刘建华. 土-结构动力相互作用体系阻尼及地震反应分析[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2923 -2928 .
[6] 徐速超,冯夏庭,陈炳瑞. 矽卡岩单轴循环加卸载试验及声发射特性研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2929 -2934 .
[7] 张力霆,齐清兰,魏静,霍倩,周国斌. 淤填黏土固结过程中孔隙比的变化规律[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2935 -2939 .
[8] 张其一. 复合加载模式下地基失效机制研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2940 -2944 .
[9] 易 俊,姜永东,鲜学福,罗 云,张 瑜. 声场促进煤层气渗流的应力-温度-渗流压力场的流固动态耦合模型[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2945 -2949 .
[10] 陶干强,杨仕教,任凤玉. 崩落矿岩散粒体流动性能试验研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2950 -2954 .