岩土力学 ›› 2023, Vol. 44 ›› Issue (11): 3288-3298.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2023.0540

• 岩土工程研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

考虑地层变异和参数空间变异的浅基础承载力可靠度分析

姜琪浩1,王金铜2,侯波3,张东明1,张晋彰1   

  1. 1. 同济大学 地下建筑与工程系,上海 200092;2. 中建三局集团有限公司,湖北 武汉 430064; 3. 中建铁路投资建设集团有限公司,北京 100053
  • 收稿日期:2023-05-01 接受日期:2023-09-20 出版日期:2023-11-28 发布日期:2023-11-29
  • 通讯作者: 张晋彰,男,1994年生,博士后,主要从事不确定地层智能重构及隧道耦合解耦研究。 E-mail: zhangjz@tongji.edu.cn E-mail:2310045@tongji.edu.cn
  • 作者简介:姜琪浩,男,1999年生,博士研究生,主要从事地层和参数空间变异对岩土结构的影响研究。
  • 基金资助:
    国家重点基础研究发展计划项目(No. 2021YFF0502200);博士后创新人才支持(No. BX20220234);中建铁路投资建设集团有限公司资助项目(No. CSCECZJTT-2021-07)。

Bearing capacity of shallow foundations considering geological uncertainty and soil spatial variability

JIANG Qi-hao1, WANG Jin-tong2, HOU Bo3, ZHANG Dong-ming1, ZHANG Jin-zhang1   

  1. 1. College of Civil Engineering, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China; 2. China Construction Third Engineering Bureau Group, Wuhan, Hubei 430064, China; 3. China Construction Railway Investment and Construction Group, Beijing 100053, China
  • Received:2023-05-01 Accepted:2023-09-20 Online:2023-11-28 Published:2023-11-29
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (2021YFF0502200), China National Postdoctoral Program for Innovative Talents (BX20220234) and China Construction Railway Investment and Construction Group Support Project (CSCECZJTT-2021-07).

摘要: 地层不确定性显著影响浅基础承载力,其不确定性主要包括地层变异和参数空间变异性。以往研究已分别研究了地层变异和参数空间变异性对浅基础承载力的影响。旨在建立浅基础承载力的随机概率计算框架,以揭示地层不确定性对浅基础承载能力的影响。其中,使用马尔可夫随机场模拟地层变异。在此基础上,考虑土体参数竖向相关距离的变化,使用对数正态随机场模拟不同地层中土体参数的空间变异性。基于深圳妈湾的钻孔和土体参数数据,根据所提出的计算框架进行浅基础承载力分析。使用子集模拟方法加速计算各方案的可靠度,提出了缩小系数对计算结果进行不同程度的缩减以达到简化考虑空间变异性的效果。定义了贡献率指标以定量计算地层变异和参数空间变异性对浅基础承载力计算结果的影响。结果表明,如果不考虑地层不确定性,传统确定性的承载力计算会高估浅基础的承载力。当钻孔数量较少时,地层变异对承载力计算起主要影响;当钻孔数量充足时,则由参数空间变异主导。

关键词: 浅基础承载力, 地层变异, 参数空间变异, 贡献率指标

Abstract: The bearing capacity of shallow foundations is significantly affected by stratum uncertainty, mainly including geological uncertainty and spatial variability of soil properties. The influence of geological uncertainty and soil spatial variability on the bearing capacity of shallow foundations has been separately investigated in previous studies. This study aims to develop a general probabilistic computational framework to reveal the effects of geological uncertainty and spatial variability of soil properties on the bearing capacity of shallow foundations, in which the geological uncertainty is simulated by Markov random field and the soil spatial variability is characterized using log-normal random field in different strata considering variations of the vertical scale of fluctuation. Based on the borehole and soil data collected from Mawan, Shenzhen, shallow foundation bearing capacity analysis is performed according to the proposed computational framework. The subset simulation method is used to accelerate the calculation of the reliability of each scenario, and reduction factors are proposed to reduce the calculation results to different degrees with the aim of simplifying the consideration of spatial variability. Contribution indexes are defined to quantify the effects of the geological uncertainty and spatial variability of soil properties on the bearing capacity results of shallow foundations. The results show that the traditional deterministic bearing capacity calculation will overestimate the bearing capacity of shallow foundations without considering the stratum uncertainty. When the number of boreholes is sparse, the geological uncertainty has a greater influence on the calculation results; when the number of boreholes is sufficient, it is mainly dominated by the spatial variability of soil properties.

Key words: bearing capacity of shallow foundation, geological uncertainty, soil spatial variability, contribution indexes

中图分类号: 

  • TU 411
[1] 于 正, 杨龙才, 张 勇, 赵 伟, . 考虑地层变异特征一致性的围岩变形不确定性分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(5): 1947-1956.
[2] 祁小辉,李典庆,曹子君,唐小松, . 考虑地层变异的边坡稳定不确定性分析[J]. , 2017, 38(5): 1385-1396.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 张鸿飞,程效军,高 攀,周鑫鑫. 隧道衬砌空洞探地雷达图谱正演模拟研究[J]. , 2009, 30(9): 2810 -2814 .
[2] 范庆来,栾茂田,刘占阁. 软土中T型触探仪贯入阻力的数值模拟[J]. , 2009, 30(9): 2850 -2854 .
[3] 张安康,陈士海,杜荣强,魏海霞. 岩石类材料的能量基率相关弹塑性损伤模型[J]. , 2010, 31(S1): 207 -210 .
[4] 王小军,屈耀辉,魏永梁,杨印海,达益正. 郑西客运专线湿陷性黄土区试验路堤的沉降观测与预测研究[J]. , 2010, 31(S1): 220 -231 .
[5] 陈 瑜,曹 平,蒲成志,刘业科,李 娜. 水-岩作用对岩石表面微观形貌影响的试验研究[J]. , 2010, 31(11): 3452 -3458 .
[6] 李明超,王忠耀,刘 杰. 水库库岸滑坡体稳定性与三维可视化模拟分析系统研究[J]. , 2009, 30(1): 270 -274 .
[7] 赵延喜,徐卫亚. 基于AHP和模糊综合评判的TBM施工风险评估[J]. , 2009, 30(3): 793 -798 .
[8] 张其一,栾茂田. 复合加载情况下非均质地基上条形基础的极限承载力研究[J]. , 2009, 30(5): 1281 -1286 .
[9] 王俊卿,李 靖,李 琦,陈 立. 黄土高边坡稳定性影响因素分析 ——以宝鸡峡引水工程为例[J]. , 2009, 30(7): 2114 -2118 .
[10] 常林越,王金昌,朱向荣. 多级线性荷载下饱和软黏土一维大应变固结解析解[J]. , 2009, 30(8): 2343 -2347 .