岩土力学 ›› 2023, Vol. 44 ›› Issue (11): 3288-3298.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2023.0540

• 岩土工程研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

考虑地层变异和参数空间变异的浅基础承载力可靠度分析

姜琪浩1,王金铜2,侯波3,张东明1,张晋彰1   

  1. 1. 同济大学 地下建筑与工程系,上海 200092;2. 中建三局集团有限公司,湖北 武汉 430064; 3. 中建铁路投资建设集团有限公司,北京 100053
  • 收稿日期:2023-05-01 接受日期:2023-09-20 出版日期:2023-11-28 发布日期:2023-11-29
  • 通讯作者: 张晋彰,男,1994年生,博士后,主要从事不确定地层智能重构及隧道耦合解耦研究。 E-mail: zhangjz@tongji.edu.cn E-mail:2310045@tongji.edu.cn
  • 作者简介:姜琪浩,男,1999年生,博士研究生,主要从事地层和参数空间变异对岩土结构的影响研究。
  • 基金资助:
    国家重点基础研究发展计划项目(No. 2021YFF0502200);博士后创新人才支持(No. BX20220234);中建铁路投资建设集团有限公司资助项目(No. CSCECZJTT-2021-07)。

Bearing capacity of shallow foundations considering geological uncertainty and soil spatial variability

JIANG Qi-hao1, WANG Jin-tong2, HOU Bo3, ZHANG Dong-ming1, ZHANG Jin-zhang1   

  1. 1. College of Civil Engineering, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China; 2. China Construction Third Engineering Bureau Group, Wuhan, Hubei 430064, China; 3. China Construction Railway Investment and Construction Group, Beijing 100053, China
  • Received:2023-05-01 Accepted:2023-09-20 Online:2023-11-28 Published:2023-11-29
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (2021YFF0502200), China National Postdoctoral Program for Innovative Talents (BX20220234) and China Construction Railway Investment and Construction Group Support Project (CSCECZJTT-2021-07).

摘要: 地层不确定性显著影响浅基础承载力,其不确定性主要包括地层变异和参数空间变异性。以往研究已分别研究了地层变异和参数空间变异性对浅基础承载力的影响。旨在建立浅基础承载力的随机概率计算框架,以揭示地层不确定性对浅基础承载能力的影响。其中,使用马尔可夫随机场模拟地层变异。在此基础上,考虑土体参数竖向相关距离的变化,使用对数正态随机场模拟不同地层中土体参数的空间变异性。基于深圳妈湾的钻孔和土体参数数据,根据所提出的计算框架进行浅基础承载力分析。使用子集模拟方法加速计算各方案的可靠度,提出了缩小系数对计算结果进行不同程度的缩减以达到简化考虑空间变异性的效果。定义了贡献率指标以定量计算地层变异和参数空间变异性对浅基础承载力计算结果的影响。结果表明,如果不考虑地层不确定性,传统确定性的承载力计算会高估浅基础的承载力。当钻孔数量较少时,地层变异对承载力计算起主要影响;当钻孔数量充足时,则由参数空间变异主导。

关键词: 浅基础承载力, 地层变异, 参数空间变异, 贡献率指标

Abstract: The bearing capacity of shallow foundations is significantly affected by stratum uncertainty, mainly including geological uncertainty and spatial variability of soil properties. The influence of geological uncertainty and soil spatial variability on the bearing capacity of shallow foundations has been separately investigated in previous studies. This study aims to develop a general probabilistic computational framework to reveal the effects of geological uncertainty and spatial variability of soil properties on the bearing capacity of shallow foundations, in which the geological uncertainty is simulated by Markov random field and the soil spatial variability is characterized using log-normal random field in different strata considering variations of the vertical scale of fluctuation. Based on the borehole and soil data collected from Mawan, Shenzhen, shallow foundation bearing capacity analysis is performed according to the proposed computational framework. The subset simulation method is used to accelerate the calculation of the reliability of each scenario, and reduction factors are proposed to reduce the calculation results to different degrees with the aim of simplifying the consideration of spatial variability. Contribution indexes are defined to quantify the effects of the geological uncertainty and spatial variability of soil properties on the bearing capacity results of shallow foundations. The results show that the traditional deterministic bearing capacity calculation will overestimate the bearing capacity of shallow foundations without considering the stratum uncertainty. When the number of boreholes is sparse, the geological uncertainty has a greater influence on the calculation results; when the number of boreholes is sufficient, it is mainly dominated by the spatial variability of soil properties.

Key words: bearing capacity of shallow foundation, geological uncertainty, soil spatial variability, contribution indexes

中图分类号: 

  • TU 411
[1] 于 正, 杨龙才, 张 勇, 赵 伟, . 考虑地层变异特征一致性的围岩变形不确定性分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(5): 1947-1956.
[2] 祁小辉,李典庆,曹子君,唐小松, . 考虑地层变异的边坡稳定不确定性分析[J]. , 2017, 38(5): 1385-1396.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 郭印同,杨春和. 硬石膏常规三轴压缩下强度和变形特性的试验研究[J]. , 2010, 31(6): 1776 -1780 .
[2] 江 权,冯夏庭,揭秉辉,曾雄辉. 地下多洞室结构的中隔墙安全度区间计算方法[J]. , 2010, 31(6): 1847 -1852 .
[3] 王 辉,陈卫忠,陈培帅,田洪铭,曹俊杰,赵武胜. 浅埋大跨小净距隧道断面形态及合理间距的优化研究[J]. , 2011, 32(S2): 641 -646 .
[4] 陈 盼,韦昌富,王吉利,伊盼盼,曹华峰. 近饱和条件下非饱和多孔介质渗流过程的数值分析[J]. , 2012, 33(1): 295 -300 .
[5] 蔡海兵 ,彭立敏 ,郑腾龙 . 隧道水平冻结施工引起地表冻胀的历时预测模型[J]. , 2012, 33(6): 1761 -1768 .
[6] 刘 晓 ,唐辉明 ,熊承仁 . 边坡动力可靠性分析方法的模式、问题与发展趋势[J]. , 2013, 34(5): 1217 -1234 .
[7] 俞建霖 ,张文龙 . 有限元法在基坑土钉支护极限高度中的应用[J]. , 2008, 29(10): 2691 -2696 .
[8] 徐能雄 ,段庆伟 ,田 红 ,于 沭 . 岩体结构三维无缝建模与四面体优化剖分[J]. , 2008, 29(10): 2811 -2816 .
[9] 陈建林 ,江 权 ,周 辉 . 锦屏二级水电站尾部厂区枢纽布置方案研究[J]. , 2008, 29(S1): 31 -36 .
[10] 赵明华,刘小平,彭文祥. 水膜理论在非饱和土中吸力的应用研究[J]. , 2007, 28(7): 1323 -1327 .