岩土力学 ›› 2023, Vol. 44 ›› Issue (11): 3173-3181.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2023.0779

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

离心机振动台模型试验验证的珊瑚礁砂液化判别方法研究

梁小丛1, 2,陈平山1, 2,刘志军1, 2,王永志3,朱明星1, 2   

  1. 1. 中交四航工程研究院有限公司,广东 广州 510230;2. 南方海洋科学与工程广东省实验室(珠海),广东 珠海 519082; 3. 中国地震局工程力学研究所 地震工程与工程振动重点实验室,黑龙江 哈尔滨 150080
  • 收稿日期:2023-06-12 接受日期:2023-09-21 出版日期:2023-11-28 发布日期:2023-11-28
  • 作者简介:梁小丛,男,1988年生,硕士,高级工程师,主要从事陆域形成与地基加固、地基液化风险评估与防治、地基原位测试技术等相关领域科研工作。
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金项目(No.42377150)

A liquefaction evaluation method for coral sand based on dynamical centrifuge model test verification

LIANG Xiao-cong1, 2, CHEN Ping-shan1, 2, LIU ZHI-jun1, 2, WANG Yong-zhi3, ZHU Ming-xing1, 2   

  1. 1. CCCC Fourth Harbor Engineering Institute Co., Ltd., Guangzhou, Guangdong 510230, China; 2. Southern Marine Science and Engineering Guangdong Laboratory (Zhuhai), Zhuhai, Guangdong 519082, China; 3. Key Laboratory of Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration, Institute of Engineering Mechanics, China Earthquake Administration, Harbin, Heilongjiang 150080, China
  • Received:2023-06-12 Accepted:2023-09-21 Online:2023-11-28 Published:2023-11-28
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (42377150).

摘要:

工程现场珊瑚礁砂场地主要以珊瑚砂、砾组成的宽级配珊瑚礁砂,其砾粒含量分布从20%~90%,其液化特性与普通石英砂有较大区别,如仍采用现行液化判别方法评估珊瑚礁砂场地液化潜势,则容易导致工程场地的抗液化处理设计不经济或无法满足要求。以中国南海岛礁和东帝汶珊瑚礁砂为研究对象开展了原级配大动三轴试验分析,建立了基于抗液化强度(cyclic resistance ratios,简称CRR)与相对密实度Dr关系液化判别方法,并通过离心机振动试验进行对比分析。结果表明,当采取相同地震动工况时,由动三轴试验产生的超孔压比相比模型试验超孔压比大;当持时增加到30周时(对应震级8级),土体液化深度达20 m,有效证明了珊瑚礁砂场地遭遇强地震动时具有液化潜在风险。此外,通过液化判别计算,验证了基于CRR-Dr关系的液化判别方法准确率达82.5%,且判别不一致工况的判别结果偏保守,进一步验证了此方法可应用于工程抗液化设计。

关键词: 珊瑚礁砂, 液化判别方法, 离心机振动台模型试验, 强地震动

Abstract:

The coral sand in the project site is mainly composed of coral sand and gravel with wide gradation characteristics, and its coral gravel content is distributed from 20% to 90%. Its liquefaction characteristics are quite different from quartz sand. The application of the current liquefaction evaluation method to the coral reef sand site will lead to the design of liquefaction remediation being uneconomical or unacceptable. In this study, the sands from islands and reefs of the South China Sea and the coral reefs of East Timor were taken as the research objects to conduct the original gradation dynamic triaxial test. A liquefaction evaluation method was developed based on the relationship between the liquefaction resistance CRR and the relative density Dr, and a comparative analysis was carried out through the centrifuge vibration test. The results show that under the same ground motion conditions, the excess pore pressure ratio generated by the dynamic triaxial test is larger than that of the model test; when the duration increases to 30 weeks (corresponding to magnitude 8), the soil liquefaction depth is up to 20 m, which effectively proves that the coral reef sand site has the potential risk of liquefaction under the action of strong earthquakes. In addition, through the calculation of liquefaction discrimination, it is verified that the accuracy rate of the liquefaction evaluation method based on the “CRR-Dr” relationship is 82.5%, and the inconsistent results are conservative for the working conditions, which can be applied to engineering liquefaction mitigation design.

Key words: coral sand, liquefaction evaluation method, centrifuge vibration model test, strong earthquake motion

中图分类号: 

  • TU 435
[1] 陈 磊,陈国兴,龙 慧. 地铁交叉隧道近场强地震反应特性的三维精细化非线性有限元分析[J]. , 2010, 31(12): 3971-3976.
[2] 张玉敏,盛 谦,朱泽奇,张占荣. 深度衰减效应对大型地下洞室群强震响应的影响分析[J]. , 2010, 31(10): 3197-3202.
[3] 梁庆国 ,韩文峰 ,马润勇 ,谌文武,. 强地震动作用下层状岩体破坏的物理模拟研究[J]. , 2005, 26(8): 1307-1311.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 李荣建,于玉贞,吕 禾,李广信. 饱和砂土地基上抗滑桩加固边坡的动力离心模型试验研究[J]. , 2009, 30(4): 897 -902 .
[2] 钱建固 ,黄茂松. 土体塑性各向异性的微宏观机理分析[J]. , 2011, 32(S2): 88 -93 .
[3] 朱崇辉 ,王增红 ,希罗科夫 B. H.. 单点击实法击实试验研究[J]. , 2012, 33(1): 60 -64 .
[4] 丁金华 ,童 军 ,张 静 ,周武华 . 环境因素对土工格栅蠕变特性的影响[J]. , 2012, 33(7): 2048 -2054 .
[5] 卢坤林,朱大勇,杨 扬. 二维与三维边坡稳定性分析结果的比较与分析[J]. , 2012, 33(S2): 150 -154 .
[6] 陈 锋 林鲁生 白世伟 丁秀丽 . 东深供水改造工程凤岗隧洞段岩体参数位移反分析[J]. , 2002, 23(5): 657 -660 .
[7] 倪绍虎,肖 明. 地下工程渗流排水孔数值模拟的隐式复合单元法[J]. , 2008, 29(6): 1659 -1664 .
[8] 刘泉声 ,柳志平 ,程 勇 ,贾瑞华 . 水泥土在侵蚀环境中的试验研究和等效分析[J]. , 2013, 34(7): 1854 -1860 .
[9] 简文星 ,殷坤龙 ,马昌前 ,刘礼领 ,张 超 . 万州侏罗纪红层软弱夹层特征[J]. , 2005, 26(6): 901 -905 .
[10] 吴礼舟,贾学明,王启智. CCNBD断裂韧度试样的SIF新公式和在尺度律分析中的应用[J]. , 2004, 25(2): 233 -237 .