岩土力学 ›› 2024, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (1): 1-19.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2023.1785

• 岩土力学卓越论坛 •    下一篇

中国大规模盐穴储氢需求与挑战

杨春和1, 2,王贵宾1, 2,施锡林1, 2,朱施杰1, 3,郑铸颜1, 2,刘伟3,范金洋3   

  1. 1. 中国科学院武汉岩土力学研究所 岩土力学与工程国家重点实验室,湖北 武汉 430071;2. 中国科学院大学,北京 100049; 3. 重庆大学 煤矿灾害动力学与控制全国重点实验室,重庆 400044
  • 收稿日期:2023-11-06 接受日期:2023-12-11 出版日期:2024-01-10 发布日期:2024-01-09
  • 作者简介:杨春和,男,1962年生,中国工程院院士,博士,研究员,博士生导师,长期从事深地储能相关的科学研究和工程应用工作。
  • 基金资助:
    中国工程院院地合作项目(No. HB2022B08);国家自然科学基金优秀青年科学基金项目(No. 52122403);国家自然科学基金面上项目(No. 42272321);湖北省重点研发计划(No. 2022BAA093);中石化科技部技术攻关项目(No. P23195)。

Demands and challenges of large-scale salt cavern hydrogen storage in China

YANG Chun-he1, 2, WANG Gui-bin1, 2, SHI Xi-lin1, 2, ZHU Shi-jie1, 3, ZHENG Zhu-yan1, 2, LIU Wei3, FAN Jin-yang3   

  1. 1. State Key Laboratory of Geomechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, Institute of Rock and Soil Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan, Hubei 430071, China; 2. University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China; 3. State Key Laboratory of Coal Mine Disaster Dynamics and Control, Chongqing University, Chongqing 400044, China
  • Received:2023-11-06 Accepted:2023-12-11 Online:2024-01-10 Published:2024-01-09
  • Supported by:
    the Strategic Research and Consulting Project of Chinese Academy of Engineering (HB2022B08), Excellent Young Scientists Fund Program of National Natural Science Foundation of China (52122403), the General Project of National Natural Science Foundation of China (42272321), the Key R&D Project of Hubei Province, China (2022BAA093) and the Technical Research Projects of China Petrochemical Corporation (P23195).

摘要: 氢能是来源广泛且低碳清洁的能源,大力发展氢能产业是实现双碳目标和应对全球能源转型的重要举措。在氢能“制备―储存―运输―应用”全产业链中,储氢难问题长期制约着氢能产业高质量发展。盐穴储氢具有成本低、规模大、安全性高和储氢纯度高等突出优势,是未来氢能大规模储备的重要发展方向,也是我国能源低碳转型的重大战略需求。综合调研了我国制氢产业和氢能消费现状,分析了我国盐穴储氢的需求。调研了国外利用盐穴储存天然气和氢气的技术及工程现状,总结了我国盐穴储气库发展和建设历程。对比了利用盐穴储存天然气、氦气、压缩空气和氢气的异同点,提出我国盐穴储氢面临三大科技挑战:层状盐岩氢气渗透与生化反应、盐穴储氢库井筒完整性管控、储氢库群灾变孕育与防控。研究成果明确了我国氢气储备需求的快速增长趋势和大规模盐穴储氢的重点攻关方向。

关键词: 盐穴储氢, 层状盐岩, 氢岩反应, 井筒完整性, 库群灾变

Abstract: Hydrogen is a low-carbon and clean energy source that can be produced from a wide range of sources, and the vigorous development of hydrogen energy industry is an important measure to achieve the dual-carbon goal and cope with the global energy transition. In the whole industry chain of "preparation–storage–transportation–application" of hydrogen energy, the difficulty of hydrogen storage has long been a constraint to the high-quality development of hydrogen energy industry. Salt cavern hydrogen storage has outstanding advantages such as low cost, large scale, high safety, and high hydrogen storage purity, which is an important development direction of large-scale hydrogen storage in the future, and also a major strategic demand during China's low-carbon energy transition. The current situations of hydrogen production industry and hydrogen energy consumption in China were comprehensively investigated, and the demand for salt cavern hydrogen storage in China was further analyzed. The technology and engineering status of using salt caverns to store natural gas and hydrogen in foreign countries were investigated, and the development and construction history of salt cavern storage in China were summarized. The similarities and differences of using salt caverns to store natural gas, helium, compressed air, and hydrogen were compared, and three major scientific and technological challenges that salt cavern hydrogen storage in Chin faces were proposed: hydrogen seepage and biochemical reaction in bedded salt rock, wellbore integrity control in salt cavern hydrogen storage, and pregnancy and prevention of disaster in hydrogen storage groups. The research results clearly define the rapid growth trend of hydrogen storage demand and the key research directions of large-scale salt cavern hydrogen storage in China.

Key words: salt cavern hydrogen storage, bedded salt rock, hydrogen–rock reaction, wellbore integrity, storage group catastrophe

中图分类号: 

  • TE 822
[1] 张桂民, 王贞硕, 刘俣轩, 罗宁, 董纪伟. 水平盐穴中压气蓄能储库关键顶板稳定性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(3): 800-812.
[2] 姜德义, 李晓康, 陈 结, 李晓军, 刘 伟, 康燕飞, . 层状盐岩双井流场浓度场试验及数值计算[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(1): 165-172.
[3] 孟 涛,胡耀青,付庆楠,冯 淦,靳佩华,. 层状盐岩石膏夹层在腐蚀条件下断裂韧度试验及其弱化机制研究[J]. , 2017, 38(7): 1933-1942.
[4] 郝铁生,耿毅德,陈跃都,. 含脆硬夹层盐岩力学特性试验研究[J]. , 2017, 38(11): 3119-3126.
[5] 王兵武 ,李银平 ,杨春和 ,刘 伟 ,张桂民,. 界面倾角对复合层状物理模型材料力学特性的影响研究[J]. , 2015, 36(S2): 139-147.
[6] 任 松,吴建勋,陈 结,姜德义,文永江,邱华富. 层状盐岩造腔仿真软件开发及其实用性验证[J]. , 2014, 35(9): 2725-2730.
[7] 贾 超,张 凯,张强勇,徐 坤. 基于正交试验设计的层状盐岩地下储库群多因素优化研究[J]. , 2014, 35(6): 1718-1726.
[8] 刘 伟、 李银平、霍永胜、施锡林、徐宝财、杨春和、林永杰、. 盐岩地下储库围岩界面变形与破损特性分析[J]. , 2013, 34(6): 1621-1628.
[9] 井文君 ,杨春和 ,陈 锋 ,纪文栋 ,徐玉龙 . 层状盐岩中储备库油气渗漏风险的故障树分析[J]. , 2012, 33(6): 1869-1875.
[10] 李 林 ,陈 结 ,姜德义 ,杨春和 ,刘 春. 单轴条件下层状盐岩的表面裂纹扩展分析[J]. , 2011, 32(5): 1394-1398.
[11] 黄小兰 ,杨春和 ,陈 锋 ,李银平 ,李应芳. 潜江地区层状盐岩天然气储库密闭性评价研究[J]. , 2011, 32(5): 1473-1478.
[12] 王安明,李小根,杨春和,黄志全. 层状盐岩蠕变变形相互作用研究[J]. , 2010, 31(12): 3964-3969.
[13] 王安明,杨春和,黄 诚,李银平. 层状盐岩力学和变形特性数值试验研究[J]. , 2009, 30(7): 2173-2178.
[14] 郤保平 ,赵阳升 ,赵延林 ,康志勤 . 层状盐岩储库长期运行腔体围岩流变破坏及渗透现象研究[J]. , 2008, 29(S1): 241-246.
[15] 尹雪英,杨春和,李银平. 层状盐岩体三维Cosserat介质扩展本构模型的程序实现[J]. , 2007, 28(7): 1415-1420.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 姚仰平,侯 伟. 土的基本力学特性及其弹塑性描述[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2881 -2902 .
[2] 徐金明,羌培,张鹏飞. 粉质黏土图像的纹理特征分析[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2903 -2907 .
[3] 向天兵,冯夏庭,陈炳瑞,江 权,张传庆. 三向应力状态下单结构面岩石试样破坏机制与真三轴试验研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2908 -2916 .
[4] 石玉玲,门玉明,彭建兵,黄强兵,刘洪佳. 地裂缝对不同结构形式桥梁桥面的破坏试验研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2917 -2922 .
[5] 夏栋舟,何益斌,刘建华. 土-结构动力相互作用体系阻尼及地震反应分析[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2923 -2928 .
[6] 徐速超,冯夏庭,陈炳瑞. 矽卡岩单轴循环加卸载试验及声发射特性研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2929 -2934 .
[7] 张力霆,齐清兰,魏静,霍倩,周国斌. 淤填黏土固结过程中孔隙比的变化规律[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2935 -2939 .
[8] 张其一. 复合加载模式下地基失效机制研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2940 -2944 .
[9] 易 俊,姜永东,鲜学福,罗 云,张 瑜. 声场促进煤层气渗流的应力-温度-渗流压力场的流固动态耦合模型[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2945 -2949 .
[10] 陶干强,杨仕教,任凤玉. 崩落矿岩散粒体流动性能试验研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2950 -2954 .