柔性和刚性浅基础的地基承载能力分析

›› 2008, Vol. 29 ›› Issue (12): 3375-3380.

柔性和刚性浅基础的地基承载能力分析

马少坤^1?3，黄茂松^1，2，刘怡林^1，2，4

1. 同济大学岩土及地下工程教育部重点试验室，上海 200092；2. 广西大学资源与环境学院，南宁 530004； 3. 同济大学地下建筑与工程系，上海 200092；4. 交通部公路科学研究所，北京 100088

收稿日期:2007-03-27 出版日期:2008-12-10 发布日期:2013-08-11
作者简介:马少坤，男，1972年生，博士研究生，主要从事地基承载力的研究
基金资助:
西部交通建设科技项目（No.2004 318 223 11）；广西大学科研基金项目（No.x071069）

Analysis of bearing capacity of subsoil under flexible and rigid shallow foundations

MA Shao-kun^1?3, HUANG Mao-song^{1, 2}, LIU Yi-lin^{1, 2, 4}

1. Key Laboratory of Geotechnical and Underground Engineering of Ministry of Education, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China; 2. College of Resources and Environment, Guangxi University, Nanning 530004, China; 3. Department of Geotechnical Engineering, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China; 4. Highway Research Institute of Ministry of Communications, Beijing 100088, China

Received:2007-03-27 Online:2008-12-10 Published:2013-08-11

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为了研究刚性和柔性加载面下地基的破坏机制和极限承载力，着重对比分析了不考虑土体自重条件下柔性基础、基底完全光滑或完全粗糙的刚性基础的地基，采用关联流动的Mohr-Coulomb内切圆屈服准则，通过增量加载的有限元方法，全程模拟了地基由初始的线弹性状态逐渐过渡到塑性流动的极限破坏状态的过程。通过对这3种基础类型下地基的计算结果的对比分析，并结合国内外模型试验成果，得到如下结论：柔性和刚性浅基础地基在不考虑土体自重的条件下有相近的地基极限承载力，但基底水平面上竖向应力和位移的发展规律、临塑荷载及滑动面有着明显的区别。

关键词: 地基极限承载力, 屈服准则, 增量加载, 柔性基础, 刚性基础

Abstract: In order to study the failure mechanism and ultimate bearing capacity of weightless subsoil under rigid and flexible foundations, comparative studies are conducted for flexible foundation, rigid rough foundation and rigid smooth foundation in the case that the effect of soil dead-weight was negligible. Mohr-Coulomb inside-tangent circle yield criterion under associated flow rule was adopted. The ultimate failure state of subsoil from linear elasticity to plasticity gradually was modeled by incremental elastoplastic FEM. Some conclusions are drawn from computational results of three kinds of foundations mentioned above and model test results in the literature. It is shown that the weightless subsoil under rigid and flexible foundations have similar ultimate bearing capacity; while development trends of vertical stress and displacement, critical edge pressures and slip surfaces are obviously different.

Key words: bearing capacity of subsoil, yield criterion, elastoplastic finite element method, flexible foundation, rigid foundation

中图分类号:

TU 470

马少坤，黄茂松，刘怡林 . 柔性和刚性浅基础的地基承载能力分析[J]. , 2008, 29(12): 3375-3380.

MA Shao-kun , HUANG Mao-song , LIU Yi-lin . Analysis of bearing capacity of subsoil under flexible and rigid shallow foundations[J]. , 2008, 29(12): 3375-3380.

参考文献

相关文章 15

[1]	芮瑞, 孙义, 朱勇, 吴端正, 夏元友, . 刚性基础下复合地基褥垫层细观工作机制[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(2): 445-454.
[2]	刘扬，杨刚，王军祥，姜谙男，. 岩石摩尔-库仑弹塑性损伤本构模型及其主应力隐式返回映射算法研究[J]. , 2017, 38(S1): 418-428.
[3]	管华栋，周晓敏. 基于围岩相互作用的冻结壁弹塑性分析对比研究[J]. , 2017, 38(3): 649-655.
[4]	刘新荣，王子娟，傅晏，张梁，袁文，缪露莉, . 考虑干湿循环作用泥质砂岩的强度与破坏准则研究[J]. , 2017, 38(12): 3395-3401.
[5]	蒋欢，王水林，王万军,. 一种求解应变软化岩体中球腔问题的数值方法[J]. , 2016, 37(S2): 697-705.
[6]	周辉，李震，朱国金，李云，卢景景，张冬冬,. 基于岩石统一能量屈服准则的硬岩损伤模型[J]. , 2016, 37(3): 609-615.
[7]	叶观宝，蔡永生，张振 , . 加芯水泥土桩复合地基桩土应力比计算方法研究[J]. , 2016, 37(3): 672-678.
[8]	周辉，卢景景，徐荣超，张传庆，陈王君，孟凡震. 硬脆性大理岩拉剪破坏特征与屈服准则研究[J]. , 2016, 37(2): 305-314.
[9]	苏辉，杨石飞，顾国荣. 基于旁压试验土体弹塑性本构模型初探[J]. , 2015, 36(S1): 131-136.
[10]	蔡燕燕，张建智，俞缙，陈士海,. 考虑围岩蠕变全过程与扩容的深埋隧洞非线性位移解[J]. , 2015, 36(7): 1831-1839.
[11]	吴顺川，耿晓杰，高永涛，赵国军，李健，严琼，. 基于广义Hoek-Brown准则的隧道纵向变形曲线研究[J]. , 2015, 36(4): 946-952.
[12]	王军祥，姜谙男 , . 岩石弹塑性损伤本构模型建立及在隧道工程中的应用[J]. , 2015, 36(4): 1147-1158.
[13]	钟祖良，王睢，刘新荣 , . 基于综合结构势概念的结构性原状黄土屈服准则[J]. , 2015, 36(11): 3041-3046.
[14]	许渊，李亮，邹金锋，袁臻. 考虑轴向力和渗透力时圆形隧道广义Hoek-Brown解[J]. , 2015, 36(10): 2837-2846.
[15]	王水林，郑宏，刘泉声，郭明伟，葛修润. 应变软化岩体分析原理及其应用[J]. , 2014, 35(3): 609-621.

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed