›› 2008, Vol. 29 ›› Issue (S1): 15-20.

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

小湾拱坝变形承载力及整体安全度评价与分析

段庆伟,耿克勤,吴永平,贾志欣   

  1. 中国水利水电科学研究院,北京 100044
  • 收稿日期:2008-07-25 出版日期:2008-11-11 发布日期:2016-04-15
  • 作者简介:段庆伟,男,1970年生,博士,高级工程师,主要从事岩土工程及数值分析方面的研究
  • 基金资助:

    国家自然基金重点项目(No. 50539100)

Evaluation of global safety degree of Xiaowan arch dam

DUAN Qing-wei, GENG Ke-qin, WU Yong-ping, JIA Zhi-xin   

  1. China Institute of Water Resources and Hydropower Research,Beijing 100044,China
  • Received:2008-07-25 Online:2008-11-11 Published:2016-04-15

摘要: 运用三维非线性有限差分数值分析方法,研究小湾拱坝在多种工况下的应力场和位移场以及蚀变带、卸荷松弛岩体对拱坝安全度的影响。坝体建基面的抗剪验算表明小湾拱坝建基面的面安全度偏低,其主要原因除了小湾拱坝所受水推力超大外,建基面上由于开挖引起的岩体松弛效应也是重要原因。分析表明坝踵部位的受拉屈服范围已经接近于帷幕位置,必须引起重视并采区必要的防范措施。坝体分别按线弹性和非线性弹塑性进行超载分析,上游水压力超载引起小湾拱坝丧失承载力的安全度,前者约为6.5,后者约为3.5,因此小湾拱坝的整体安全度为3.5,应受坝体强度控制,右岸坝基安全度小于左岸。根据屈服破坏区的分布指出在右岸高程1 160~1 190 m之间由于坝肩下游深沟和蚀变带的存在,在超载系数大于5.0时,该将出现贯通性屈服。

关键词: 小湾拱坝, 三维有限差分, 整体安全度评价

Abstract: With 3D nonlinear finite difference method , the influences of deformation, stress, corrosive rock masses and loose strips on dam safety are researched. The result indicates the surface safety degree of bedding is low due to the great water pressure and the bedrock loose effect; the tension plastic zone of dam heel rock masses is closed to the impervious certain, which must be regarded and such measurement is necessary. Elastic and elastoplastic model are adopted respectively on dam material in the overload analysis; Xiaowan arch dam’s safety degree caused by upstream overloading water pressure is 6.5 and 3.5 respectively. So the global safety degree is 3.5 and controlled by the dam strength. Through the distribution and spread process of plastic zone, the rock masses between the elevations 1 160 m and 1 190 m are in transfixing plastic due to the existing of deepl valley and corrosive when the overload coefficient reached 5.0.

Key words: Xiaowan arch dam, 3D finite difference, evaluation of global safety degree

中图分类号: 

  • TU 642.4
[1] 高广运 ,李绍毅 ,涂美吉 ,张先林,. 地铁循环荷载作用下交叉隧道沉降分析[J]. , 2015, 36(S1): 486-490.
[2] 李 强 ,王明年 ,李玉文 . 双跨连拱隧道两种中墙的空间力学效应分析[J]. , 2006, 27(4): 667-672.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 周红波,高文杰,蔡来炳,张 辉. 基于WBS-RBS的地铁基坑故障树风险识别与分析[J]. , 2009, 30(9): 2703 -2707 .
[2] 周爱军,栗 冰. CFG桩复合地基褥垫层的试验研究和有限元分析[J]. , 2010, 31(6): 1803 -1808 .
[3] 雷 鹏,苏怀智,张贵金. 基于RNN模型的坝体和岩基区间参数反演方法研究[J]. , 2011, 32(2): 547 -552 .
[4] 王劲松,陈正阳,梁光华. GPS一机多天线公路高边坡实时监测系统研究[J]. , 2009, 30(5): 1532 -1536 .
[5] 宋勇军,胡 伟,王德胜,周军林. 基于修正剑桥模型的挤密桩挤土效应分析[J]. , 2011, 32(3): 811 -814 .
[6] 孙德安,孟德林,孙文静,刘月妙. 两种膨润土的土-水特征曲线[J]. , 2011, 32(4): 973 -0978 .
[7] 鲁 涛,王孔伟,李建林. 库水压力作用下砂岩破坏形式的探究[J]. , 2011, 32(S1): 413 -0418 .
[8] 陈建斌 ,孔令伟 ,赵艳林 ,吕海波 . 非饱和土的蒸发效应与影响因素分析[J]. , 2007, 28(1): 36 -40 .
[9] 刘加才 ,赵维炳 ,宰金珉 ,王旭东 . 双层黏弹性地基一维固结分析[J]. , 2007, 28(4): 743 -746 .
[10] 陈立宏,陈祖煜. 堆石非线性强度特性对高土石坝稳定性的影响[J]. , 2007, 28(9): 1807 -1810 .