深基坑土钉和预应力锚杆复合支护方式的探讨

›› 2009, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (12): 3793-3796.

深基坑土钉和预应力锚杆复合支护方式的探讨

董诚¹，郑颖人¹，陈新颖²，唐晓松¹

1.后勤工程学院，重庆 400041；2.济南四建（集团）责任有限公司，济南 250031

收稿日期:2008-05-28 出版日期:2009-12-10 发布日期:2010-01-18
作者简介:董诚，男，1975年生，博士研究生，主要从事岩土工程稳定性分析及其数值模拟。

Research on composite support pattern of soil nails and prestressed anchors in deep foundation pits

DONG Cheng¹, ZHENG Ying-ren¹, CHEN Xin-ying², TANG Xiao-song¹

1.Logistical Engineering University, Chongqing 400041, China; 2.The Fourth Constructing Company (Group) of Limited Liability, Jinan 250031, China

Received:2008-05-28 Online:2009-12-10 Published:2010-01-18

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

土钉与预应力锚杆的复合支护方式是当前基坑工程中经常采用的支护方式。结合工程实例，利用有限元软件PLAXIS，合理选择本构模型，对土钉和预应力锚杆复合支护方式和土钉墙两种支护方式的基坑边坡稳定系数和边坡变形进行了分析。分析结果表明，在土钉和预应力锚杆的复合支护方式中，预应力锚杆的位置比较重要，通常锚杆的位置越靠近坡顶，则锚杆发挥的作用越大，效果越理想；土钉和预应力锚杆的复合支护方式与土钉支护相比，位移有所减小，但合理选择锚杆的数量和预应力值对最终效果有一定影响；基坑边坡的局部放坡有利于控制基坑坑口的最大水平位移。

关键词: 土钉, 预应力锚杆, 基坑支护, PLAXIS

Abstract:

The composite support pattern of soil nails and prestressed anchors are commonly adopted in the projects of deep foundation pits. By using the FEM program of PLAXIS and choosing appropriate material models, the support pattern of soil nails and prestressed anchors and the pattern of soil nail walls are analyzed. Then the slope stability of foundation pits is studied; and it is shown that the location of prestressed anchor is vital in the composite support pattern. The closer the anchor is to the top of the slope, the more useful the anchor is and better the effect is. Compared with support pattern of soil nails, the displacement of soil nails and prestressed anchor tends to reduce. However, the number of anchors and the value of prestress have some effects on the final result; and the localized inclined ramp is beneficial to control the maximum horizontal displacement of the pithead.

Key words: soil nails, prestressed anchors, support of deep foundation pits, PLAXIS

中图分类号:

TU 473

董诚，郑颖人，陈新颖，唐晓松. 深基坑土钉和预应力锚杆复合支护方式的探讨[J]. , 2009, 30(12): 3793-3796.

DONG Cheng, ZHENG Ying-ren, CHEN Xin-ying, TANG Xiao-song. Research on composite support pattern of soil nails and prestressed anchors in deep foundation pits[J]. , 2009, 30(12): 3793-3796.

参考文献

相关文章 15

[1]	朱彦鹏, 陶钧, 杨校辉, 彭俊国, 吴强, . 框架预应力锚托板结构加固高填方边坡设计与数值分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 612-623.
[2]	郭院成, 李明宇, 张艳伟, . 预应力锚杆复合土钉墙支护体系增量解析方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 253-258.
[3]	王小伟, 朱杰兵, 李聪, . pH和O2协同作用下预应力锚杆腐蚀损伤行为试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(11): 4306-4312.
[4]	郭红仙, 周鼎. 软土中基坑土钉支护稳定性问题探讨[J]. 岩土力学, 2018, 39(S2): 398-404.
[5]	欧孝夺，全守岳，彭远胜，江杰，吕波，蒋华，. 新型装配式基坑支护结构设计与试验[J]. , 2018, 39(9): 3433-3439.
[6]	贾金青，高军程，涂兵雄，张磊，王海涛，高仁哲,. 深基坑中压力型预应力锚杆柔性支护结构的离心模型试验研究[J]. , 2017, 38(S2): 304-310.
[7]	洪成雨，刘子雄，张孟喜，周奇，. 灌浆压力与上覆土压力对土钉摩阻力的影响研究[J]. , 2017, 38(S2): 317-322.
[8]	李连祥，胡峰，扈学波，张加冕,. 新型装配式可回收基坑土钉的开发和应用[J]. , 2017, 38(S1): 113-122.
[9]	张媛，董建华，董旭光，王永胜, . 季节性冻土区土钉边坡支护结构冻融反应分析[J]. , 2017, 38(2): 574-582.
[10]	顾士坦，胡成成，戴华宾，严超超, . 分段锚预应力锚杆加固围岩力学分析[J]. , 2017, 38(10): 2826-2832.
[11]	张嘎，金红柳. 水位下降条件下土钉加固土坡破坏特性研究[J]. , 2016, 37(S2): 137-143.
[12]	周勇，王正振, . 土钉墙内部稳定性分析方法改进[J]. , 2016, 37(S2): 356-362.
[13]	汪明武，赵奎元，朱其坤，蒋辉，金菊良. 基于联系累积前景理论的基坑支护方案决策[J]. , 2016, 37(S2): 622-628.
[14]	徐平，张天航，孟芳芳,. 工字钢水泥土搅拌墙基坑支护的力学性能研究[J]. , 2016, 37(S2): 769-774.
[15]	刘燕，刘俊岩，郑全明，马桂宁,. 锚杆复合土钉支护协同作用的模型试验研究[J]. , 2016, 37(S1): 462-468.

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed