›› 2011, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (9): 2839-2844.

• 岩土工程研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

软黏土中预钻孔沉桩引起的土体隆起分析

周建武1,楼晓明1, 2   

  1. 1.同济大学 地下建筑与工程系,上海 200092;2. 同济大学 岩土及地下工程教育部重点实验室,上海 200092
  • 收稿日期:2010-01-13 出版日期:2011-09-10 发布日期:2011-09-13
  • 作者简介:周建武,男,1984年生,硕士,主要从事桩基方面的研究
  • 基金资助:

    国家自然科学基金资助项目(No. 50978201)。

Analysis of soil heave due to pile-sinking with pre-drilling in soft clay

ZHOU Jian-wu1,LOU Xiao-ming1, 2   

  1. 1. Department of Geotechnical Engineering, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China; 2. Key Laboratory of Geotechnical and Underground Engineering of Ministry of Education, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China
  • Received:2010-01-13 Online:2011-09-10 Published:2011-09-13

摘要: 基于考虑初始半径的圆孔扩张理论,并根据旁压试验临界深度的形成机制与沉桩挤土的相似性,求得沉桩土体隆起的分界面,并进一步推导了沉桩引致地表隆起的曲线方程,分析了预钻孔半径对土体隆起的影响规律。由于初始半径即为沉桩施工时较为常用的预钻孔半径,因此,推导的预估土体隆起的有关方程为通用公式,当初始半径取0时,可用于普通沉桩的土体隆起分析。实际计算表明,该公式计算结果略小于实测值,但比有限元模拟的结果更接近实测值。因而提出的沉桩导致土体隆起的预估公式是简洁而实用的

关键词: 预钻孔, 地面隆起曲线, 隆起分界面, 临界深度, 圆孔扩张理论

Abstract: Based on the theory of cylindrical cavity expansion which considers the influence of initial radius, and according to the similarity between the mechanism of the critical depth of pressuremeter test and the penetration effect of pile-sinking, the interface of soil heave of pile-sinking with pre-drilling is obtained; and then a simple formula to estimate the range and magnitude of soil heave is derived. The law of soil heave due to initial radius of pre-drilling is analyzed. The initial radius is just the pre-drilling one, so the formula is universal to estimate soil heave which derived in this paper. When initial radius is zero, the formula can be used to analyze general pile-sinking. It is demonstrated that the calculated soil heave is less than the measured value, but more close to it than the FEM result. So a simple and practical formula to estimate the range and magnitude of soil heave for the engineering is given

Key words: pre-drilling, heave curve of surface, interface of soil heave, critical depth, cylindrical cavity expansion

中图分类号: 

  • TU 443
[1] 刘 杰,黄 达,赵 飞,杨 超,孙 莎,. 平移模式下挡墙塑性临界深度极限分析[J]. , 2017, 38(2): 428-434.
[2] 寇海磊 ,张明义,. 基于桩身应力测试的静压PHC管桩贯入机制[J]. , 2014, 35(5): 1295-1302.
[3] 简文彬 ,许旭堂 ,郑敏洲 ,柳 侃 ,赖树钦,. 土坡失稳的有效降雨量研究[J]. , 2013, 34(S2): 247-251.
[4] 饶平平 ,李镜培 ,张常光 . 预钻孔对邻近斜坡沉桩挤土影响分析[J]. , 2012, 33(S2): 155-161预钻孔对邻近斜坡沉桩挤土影响分析.
[5] 宋勇军,胡 伟,王德胜,周军林. 基于修正剑桥模型的挤密桩挤土效应分析[J]. , 2011, 32(3): 811-814.
[6] 彭明祥. 挡土墙主动土压力塑性临界深度的解析解[J]. , 2010, 31(10): 3179-3183.
[7] 张其一,栾茂田. 复合加载情况下双层地基极限承载力研究[J]. , 2009, 30(4): 1131-1136.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 李英勇,张顶立,张宏博,宋修广. 边坡加固中预应力锚索失效机制与失效效应研究[J]. , 2010, 31(1): 144 -150 .
[2] 李 晶,缪林昌,钟建驰,冯兆祥. EPS颗粒混合轻质土反复荷载下变形和阻尼特性[J]. , 2010, 31(6): 1769 -1775 .
[3] 梁健伟,房营光,谷任国. 极细颗粒黏土渗流的微电场效应分析[J]. , 2010, 31(10): 3043 -3050 .
[4] 王丽艳,姜朋明,刘汉龙. 砂性地基中防波堤地震残余变形机制分析与液化度预测法[J]. , 2010, 31(11): 3556 -3562 .
[5] 李秀珍,王成华,邓宏艳. DDA法和Fisher判别法在潜在滑坡判识中的应用比较[J]. , 2011, 32(1): 186 -192 .
[6] 吉武军. 黄土隧道工程问题调查分析[J]. , 2009, 30(S2): 387 -390 .
[7] 陈力华 ,林 志 ,李星平. 公路隧道中系统锚杆的功效研究[J]. , 2011, 32(6): 1843 -1848 .
[8] 陈立文,孙德安. 不同应力路径下水土耦合超固结黏土分叉分析[J]. , 2011, 32(10): 2922 -2928 .
[9] 郑 刚 张立明 刁 钰. 开挖条件下坑底工程桩工作性状及沉降计算分析[J]. , 2011, 32(10): 3089 -3096 .
[10] 赵明华,雷 勇,张 锐. 岩溶区桩基冲切破坏模式及安全厚度研究[J]. , 2012, 33(2): 524 -530 .