高风险岩溶隧道掌子面突水机制研究

›› 2011, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (4): 1175-1180.

高风险岩溶隧道掌子面突水机制研究

孙谋，刘维宁

北京交通大学土木工程与建筑学院，北京 100044

收稿日期:2009-11-09 出版日期:2011-04-10 发布日期:2011-04-29
作者简介:孙谋，男，1970年生，博士，主要从事隧道与地下工程方面的研究

Research on water inrush mechanism induced by karst tunnel face with high risk

SUN Mou，LIU Wei-ning

School of Civil Engineering, Beijing Jiaotong University, Beijing 100044, China

Received:2009-11-09 Online:2011-04-10 Published:2011-04-29

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

在我国西部强岩溶地区，越来越多的长大深埋隧道潜在突水、突泥的风险，由于隐伏岩溶水体位置、规模以及体量的不确定性，突水模式与类型异常复杂，隧道掌子面的突水风险系数极高。对于隧道开挖后围岩结构完整性较好的掌子面，在特大体量隐伏岩溶水体作用下，当开挖面进入安全厚度内迅速发生破断突水，具备明显的突变特征。针对隧道掌子面发生破断突水的突变特征，采用数值手段探讨了施工条件对突水突变现象的影响。将隧道简化为圆形，建立了掌子面失稳的折叠突变模型，通过对系统势能函数的分析，推导了隧道掌子面发生破断的突水条件和最小安全厚度计算公式，基于系统势能突变控制参数灾变演化路径的分析，提出了掌子面突水的具体防治措施，并结合工程实例验证了其可行性。

关键词: 岩溶隧道, 掌子面破断突水, 突变模型, 突水判据, 最小安全厚度

Abstract:

With the Western China development, more and more larger and deep karst tunnel will be constructed with the risk of water inrush and mud gushing in the Western China karst area; and the model and type of water inrush are so complex for the uncertain attribute of concealed water body, such as its position, scale, etc.; and the risk coefficient is very high for the tunnel face. Under the effect of especially big water bearing structure, water inrush of tunnel face happens when the excavation face enters into the minimal distance of safety thickness; and the catastrophe characters of water inrush are obvious. According to the catastrophe phenomenon, the effect of construction condition on the catastrophe characters of water inrush has been analyzed by the numerical method. With the hypothesis of circular tunnel, a fold catastrophe model of water inrush for tunnel face instability has been established; the criterion condition and minimal safety thickness have been given through analyzing the total potential energy function of tunnel face structure; based on the analysis of evolution path of catastrophe controlling parameters, the measures for preventing water inrush have been put forward, of which the feasibility has been proved with an engineering example of water inrush.

Key words: karst tunnel, water inrush induced by tunnel face instability, catastrophe model, water inrush criterion, minimal safety thickness

中图分类号:

U 45

孙谋，刘维宁. 高风险岩溶隧道掌子面突水机制研究[J]. , 2011, 32(4): 1175-1180.

SUN Mou，LIU Wei-ning. Research on water inrush mechanism induced by karst tunnel face with high risk[J]. , 2011, 32(4): 1175-1180.

参考文献

相关文章 15

[1]	刘宗辉, 刘毛毛, 周东, 蓝日彦, 吴恒, 王业田, . 基于探地雷达属性分析的典型岩溶不良地质识别方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(8): 3282-3290.
[2]	夏开宗，陈从新，宋许根，刘秀敏，周意超, . 相对湿度作用下的石膏矿护顶层突变破坏机制分析[J]. , 2018, 39(2): 589-597.
[3]	赵明华，朱志仁，黄明华，杨超炜，徐卓君. 考虑基桩嵌岩段侧阻的岩溶区顶板安全厚度计算[J]. , 2018, 39(11): 4201-4209.
[4]	杨子汉，杨小礼，许敬叔，李永鑫，孙志彬，. 基于上限原理的两种岩溶隧道岩墙厚度计算方法[J]. , 2017, 38(3): 801-809.
[5]	左清军，吴立，陆中玏，谈云志，袁青，. 浅埋偏压隧道洞口段软弱围岩失稳突变理论分析[J]. , 2015, 36(S2): 424-430.
[6]	李术才，林鹏，许振浩，李利平，郭明，. 基于条分法原理的充填型岩溶蓄水构造突水突泥最小安全厚度[J]. , 2015, 36(7): 1989-1994.
[7]	周宗青，李术才，李利平，石少帅，宋曙光，王凯 . 岩溶隧道突涌水危险性评价的属性识别模型及其工程应用[J]. , 2013, 34(3): 818-826.
[8]	许振浩，李术才，李利平，侯建刚，隋斌，石少帅. 基于层次分析法的岩溶隧道突水突泥风险评估[J]. , 2011, 32(6): 1757-1766.
[9]	周雪铭，刘辉，彭川，吴羡. 岩溶隧道开挖对溶洞处治结构影响的数值模拟分析[J]. , 2011, 32(1): 269-275.
[10]	李利平，李术才，张庆松. 岩溶地区隧道裂隙水突出力学机制研究[J]. , 2010, 31(2): 523-528.
[11]	潘岳，张勇，王志强. 煤与瓦斯突出中单个煤壳解体突出的突变理论分析[J]. , 2009, 30(3): 595-602.
[12]	赵志刚，谭云亮，程国强 . 煤巷掘进迎头煤与瓦斯突出的突变机制分析[J]. , 2008, 29(6): 1644-1648.
[13]	张勇，潘岳. 弹性地基条件下狭窄煤柱岩爆的突变理论分析[J]. , 2007, 28(7): 1469-1476.
[14]	王勇，乔春生，孙彩红，刘开云. 基于SVM的溶洞顶板安全厚度智能预测模型[J]. , 2006, 27(6): 1000-1004.
[15]	潘岳，王志强，吴敏应. 岩体动力失稳终止点、能量释放量解析解与图解[J]. , 2006, 27(11): 1915-1921.

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed