›› 2011, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (12): 3679-3684.

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

库水位波动条件下不同桩位抗滑桩抗滑稳定性研究

胡新丽,张永忠,李长冬,范付松   

  1. 中国地质大学(武汉) 工程学院,武汉 430074
  • 收稿日期:2011-10-24 出版日期:2011-12-10 发布日期:2011-12-13
  • 作者简介:胡新丽,女,1968年生,博士,教授,从事岩土工程稳定性评价、地质灾害防治设计教学与科研工作
  • 基金资助:

    国家自然科学基金项目(No. 40872175);国家重点基础研究发展计划(973计划)(No. 2011CB710604)

Anti-sliding stability of different pile positions under reservoir water level fluctuation

HU Xin-li, ZHANG Yong-zhong, LI Chang-dong, FAN Fu-song   

  1. Faculty of Engineering, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan 430074, China
  • Received:2011-10-24 Online:2011-12-10 Published:2011-12-13

摘要: 水库滑坡抗滑桩治理设计工作中,桩位的合理选择直接关系到工程安全和造价。以张桓候庙园区东侧滑坡为例,在分析滑坡地质条件的基础上,依据三峡水库实际运行条件进行不同桩位滑坡变形规律及稳定性变化规律的GeoStudio数值模拟研究。结果表明:①库水位上升时,滑坡前缘位移减小,后缘位移增大。滑坡前缘在水位下降和最低水位时出现位移极大值;滑坡后缘在水位上升和最高水位时出现位移极大值。②对滑坡后缘位移最有效的控制桩位为位于地面高程175 m的下滑段接近滑坡最大推力区域的桩位Ⅰ,对前缘和中部位移最有效的控制桩位是位于距滑坡剪出口130 m阻滑段的桩位Ⅱ,最优桩位是桩位Ⅱ。考虑水位波动的影响,提出了对现有抗滑桩设计的设计安全系数修正方法,为水库滑坡抗滑桩设计提供参考。

关键词: 库水位波动, 抗滑桩桩位, 滑坡稳定性, 设计安全系数

Abstract: In anti-sliding pile designing for Reservoir landslide improvement, the reasonable pile position determination is very important, which effects the engineering safety and cost. Taking Zhanghuanhoumiao east landslide for example, based on the engineering geological condition investigation and with the GeoStudio software, according to the reservoir operation curve, considering 4 different pile positions, the numerical simulations were done. The results show that: ① When water level rising up, the displacement of front edge decreases, but the displacement of back edge increases. The maximum displacement of the front edge appears during water level drawing down and lowest water level. The maximum. displacement of the back edge appears during water level rising up and the highest water level. ② The reasonable pile position for the back, front and middle of the landslide are separately Ⅰ, Ⅱ pile positions. I pile is at the 175m, which residual pushing force is maximum the best pile is Ⅱ pile position, which is 130m from the shearing out point of landslide. At last, considering the influence of the water level fluctuation, the modified method of the safety factor for the anti-sliding pile design is presented, which will be important to the anti-sliding pile design for reservoir landslide.

Key words: running condition of reservoir, anti-sliding pile position, landslide stability, design safety factor

中图分类号: 

  • TV 698.2+3
[1] 王金梅,张迎宾,赵兴权,余鹏程,王 潘,侯瑞彬,黄小福,魏 涛,. 用点接触模拟滑面的滑坡稳定性分析方法[J]. , 2017, 38(9): 2746-2756.
[2] 肖世国 ,祝光岑 . 悬臂式抗滑桩加固黏土边坡地震永久位移算法[J]. , 2013, 34(5): 1345-1350.
[3] 张振华,冯夏庭,周 辉,张传庆,崔 强. 基于设计安全系数及破坏模式的边坡开挖过程动态变形监测预警方法研究[J]. , 2009, 30(3): 603-612.
[4] 李 英 ,晏鄂川 ,李作成,. 三峡库区巴东红石包滑坡稳定性动态分析[J]. , 2008, 29(S1): 412-416.
[5] 朱良峰 , 李 建 ,潘 信 ,吴信才,. 基于范数灰色理论的滑坡稳定性敏感因子分析[J]. , 2006, 27(S1): 711-714.
[6] 倪 恒 ,李志建 ,张立萍,. PCR-SPA-MC模型在滑坡稳定性分析中的应用[J]. , 2004, 25(10): 1655-1658.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 刘小文,常立君,胡小荣. 非饱和红土基质吸力与含水率及密度关系试验研究[J]. , 2009, 30(11): 3302 -3306 .
[2] 王朝阳,许 强,倪万魁. 原状黄土CT试验中应力-应变关系的研究[J]. , 2010, 31(2): 387 -391 .
[3] 万少石,年廷凯,蒋景彩,栾茂田. 边坡稳定强度折减有限元分析中的若干问题讨论[J]. , 2010, 31(7): 2283 -2288 .
[4] 闫 铁,李 玮,毕雪亮. 基于分形方法的多孔介质有效应力模型研究[J]. , 2010, 31(8): 2625 -2629 .
[5] 刘 嘉,王 栋. 正常固结黏土中平板锚基础的吸力和抗拉力[J]. , 2009, 30(3): 735 -740 .
[6] 徐维生,柴军瑞,陈兴周,孙旭曙. 岩体裂隙网络非线性非立方渗流研究与应用[J]. , 2009, 30(S1): 53 -57 .
[7] 赵尚毅,郑颖人,李安洪,邱文平,唐晓松,徐 俊. 多排埋入式抗滑桩在武隆县政府滑坡中的应用[J]. , 2009, 30(S1): 160 -164 .
[8] 刘振平,贺怀建,朱发华. 基于钻孔数据的三维可视化快速建模技术的研究[J]. , 2009, 30(S1): 260 -266 .
[9] 魏厚振,颜荣涛,韦昌富,吴二林,陈 盼,田慧会. 含天然气水合物沉积物相平衡问题研究综述[J]. , 2011, 32(8): 2287 -2294 .
[10] 赵跃堂,林家炜,石 磊. 冲击荷载作用下层裂问题研究[J]. , 2011, 32(S2): 122 -126 .