›› 2012, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (4): 1087-1093.

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

防渗墙粗粒土槽孔泥皮的抗渗性试验研究

李建军,邵生俊,杨扶银,杨春鸣   

  1. 西安理工大学 岩土工程研究所,陕西省黄土力学与工程重点实验室,西安 710048
  • 收稿日期:2010-09-25 出版日期:2012-04-13 发布日期:2012-04-26
  • 通讯作者: 邵生俊,男,1964年生,博士,教授,主要从事土动力学与黄土力学方面的研究工作。E-mail: sjshao@xaut.edu.cn E-mail:503889212@qq.com
  • 作者简介:李建军,男,1967 年生,博士,高级工程师,主要从事岩土工程施工技术方面的研究工作
  • 基金资助:

    国家自然科学基金项目(No. 10872161);陕西省黄土力学与工程重点实验室基金项目。

Experimental research on impermeable characteristics of slurry cake in cutoff wall hole of coarse-grained soil

LI Jian-jun,SHAO Sheng-jun,YANG Fu-yin,YANG Chun-ming   

  1. Shaanxi Key Laboratory of Loess Mechanics and Engineering, Institute of Geotechnical Engineering, Xi’an University of Technology, Xi’an 710048, China
  • Received:2010-09-25 Online:2012-04-13 Published:2012-04-26

摘要: 通过自制泥浆渗透试验仪,针对粗粒土地基防渗墙泥皮的渗透稳定性问题,开展了护壁泥皮抗渗性能的试验研究。结果表明,泥皮具有明显的截渗作用;不同压差作用下泥浆渗透形成的泥皮具有不同的抗渗特性,压差越大、泥皮越致密,抵抗渗透破坏的能力越强,泥皮的渗透性也就越小;反压渗水作用下泥皮的抗渗性能较正压渗水作用下的抗渗性能差;随着水力作用持续时间的增长,泥皮的结构发生变化,孔隙增大,流速逐渐增大,在较大水力梯度作用下会发生破坏;泥皮的临界水力梯度与其形成时压差作用大小有关,泥皮形成压差越大,正、反向渗水的临界水力梯度越大;反之,临界水力梯度越小。关于泥皮抗渗性能的深化认识,对于完善防渗墙设计与施工具有重要的意义。

关键词: 深厚覆盖层, 泥浆渗透试验, 泥皮, 抗渗性

Abstract: In order to explore the seepage stability of slurry cake formed in the cutoff wall hole of coarse-grained soil, the impermeable characteristics of slurry cake are tested by the self-made slurry seepage apparatus. After the slurry cake wall is formed by the slurry seepage through sand samples with some particles gradation under some pressure difference, the seepage experiments of water passing through the frontal face of slurry cake or through the reversal face of slurry cake are carried out under some pressure difference. Through the analysis of test results, the following knowledge are obtained. The cutoff effect of slurry cake bearing with large gradient is significant. There are different seepage characteristics of slurry cakes formed under different pressure differences. The greater the pressure difference when the slurry cake are formed, the more compact the slurry cake is, the stronger the ability is to resist infiltration and damage, the smaller the permeability of the slurry cake is. The impermeability of water passing through reversal face of slurry cake under some pressure difference is smaller than through frontal face of slurry cake under same pressure difference. With the sustaining time of hydraulic action increasing, the structure of slurry cake will change and its seepage velocity also increases. Under the large hydraulic gradient action the slurry cake damage may occur under certain osmotic pressure difference. The critical hydraulic gradient is closely associated with the loading pressure difference of slurry cake formation. The larger the pressure difference is, the larger the critical hydraulic gradient is. On the contrary, the smaller the critical hydraulic gradient is. The above-mentioned knowledge has theoretical and practical importance that the design method and construction technology of cutoff wall in large depth covering layer is improved by investigating the impermeable characteristics of slurry cake.

Key words: large depth overburden layer, slurry seepage experiment, slurry cake, the impermeable characteristics

中图分类号: 

  • TV 443
[1] 余挺, 邵磊. 含软弱土层的深厚河床覆盖层坝基动力特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(1): 267-277.
[2] 陈 琛,冷伍明,杨 奇,金子豪,聂如松,邱 鋆,. 混凝土桩-泥皮-砂土接触面力学特性试验研究[J]. , 2018, 39(7): 2461-2472.
[3] 李 波,肖先波,徐唐锦,周 嵩,. 泥皮存在时防渗墙与复合土工膜联接型式模型试验[J]. , 2018, 39(5): 1761-1766.
[4] 张 敏 ,马建林 ,苏权科 ,吴伟胜 ,刘凯锐,. 考虑剪力环、泥皮和防腐涂层作用的钢管复合桩工作性能模型试验研究[J]. , 2014, 299(2): 389-396.
[5] 闵凡路 ,魏代伟 ,姜 腾 ,张春雷,. 泥浆在地层中的渗透特性试验研究[J]. , 2014, 35(10): 2801-2806.
[6] 潘 迎 ,何蕴龙 ,周小溪 ,曹学兴 . 河谷地形对深覆盖层中防渗墙应力变形影响分析[J]. , 2013, 34(7): 2023-2030.
[7] 石修松,程展林,左永振,胡胜刚. 坝基深厚覆盖层密度辨识方法[J]. , 2011, 32(7): 2073-2078.
[8] 朱俊高,R. R. Shakir,杨有莲,彭 凯. 土-混凝土接触面特性环剪单剪试验比较研究[J]. , 2011, 32(3): 692-696.
[9] 赵剑明,温彦锋,刘小生,陈 宁,常亚屏,刘启旺,王 宏. 深厚覆盖层上高土石坝极限抗震能力分析[J]. , 2010, 31(S1): 41-47.
[10] 张忠苗,邹 健,刘俊伟,贺静漪. 桩端后注浆浆液上返高度的理论研究[J]. , 2010, 31(8): 2535-2540.
[11] 谢兴华,王国庆. 深厚覆盖层坝基防渗墙深度研究[J]. , 2009, 30(9): 2708-2712.
[12] 杨有莲,朱俊高,余 挺,吴晓铭. 土与结构接触面力学特性环剪试验研究[J]. , 2009, 30(11): 3256-3260.
[13] 徐 晗,汪明元,程展林,饶锡保. 深厚覆盖层300 m级超高土质心墙坝应力变形特征[J]. , 2008, 29(S1): 64-68.
[14] 白 勇 ,柴军瑞 ,曹境英 ,张胜利 . 深厚覆盖层地基渗流场数值分析[J]. , 2008, 29(S1): 90-94.
[15] 张治军 ,饶锡保 ,王志军 ,丁红顺 . 泥皮厚度对结构接触面力学特性影响的试验研究[J]. , 2008, 29(9): 2433-2438.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 陶干强,杨仕教,任凤玉. 崩落矿岩散粒体流动性能试验研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2950 -2954 .
[2] 张文杰,陈云敏. 垃圾填埋场抽水试验及降水方案设计[J]. , 2010, 31(1): 211 -215 .
[3] 宫伟力,安里千,赵海燕,毛灵涛. 基于图像描述的煤岩裂隙CT图像多尺度特征[J]. , 2010, 31(2): 371 -376 .
[4] 万 智,董 辉,刘宝琛. 基于正交设计下SVM滑坡变形时序回归预测的超参数选择[J]. , 2010, 31(2): 503 -508 .
[5] 孙曦源,栾茂田,唐小微. 饱和软黏土地基中桶形基础水平承载力研究[J]. , 2010, 31(2): 667 -672 .
[6] 王明年,郭 军,罗禄森,喻 渝,杨建民,谭忠盛. 高速铁路大断面黄土隧道深浅埋分界深度研究[J]. , 2010, 31(4): 1157 -1162 .
[7] 谭峰屹,姜志全,李仲秋,颜惠和. 附加质量法在昆明新机场填料压实密度检测中的应用研究[J]. , 2010, 31(7): 2214 -2218 .
[8] 柴 波,殷坤龙,肖拥军. 巴东新城区库岸斜坡软弱带特征[J]. , 2010, 31(8): 2501 -2506 .
[9] 杨召亮,孙冠华,郑 宏. 基于潘氏极大值原理的边坡稳定性的整体分析法[J]. , 2011, 32(2): 559 -563 .
[10] 王光进,杨春和,张 超,马洪岭,孔祥云,侯克鹏. 超高排土场的粒径分级及其边坡稳定性分析研究[J]. , 2011, 32(3): 905 -913 .