水压致裂应力测量数据分析 ——对瞬时关闭压力ps的常用判读方法讨论

›› 2012, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (7): 2149-2159.

水压致裂应力测量数据分析 ——对瞬时关闭压力ps的常用判读方法讨论

丰成君^{1, 2}，陈群策^{1, 2}，吴满路^{1, 2}，赵金生^{1, 2}，李国歧^{1, 2}，安其美³

1.中国地质科学院地质力学研究所，北京 100081；2.中国地质科学院地质力学研究所国土资源部新构造运动与地质灾害重点实验室，北京 100081； 3.中国地震局地壳应力研究所，北京 100085

收稿日期:2011-03-28 出版日期:2012-07-11 发布日期:2012-07-13
作者简介:丰成君，男，1985年生，博士，主要从事地应力测量与区域构造应力场研究和学习。
基金资助:
公益性行业科研专项项目（No. 200811070）；国土资源部深部探测技术与实验研究专项（No. SinoProbr-06）

Analysis of hydraulic fracturing stress measurement data—discussion of methods frequently used to determine instantaneous shut-in pressure

FENG Cheng-jun^{1, 2}, CHEN Qun-ce^{1, 2}, WU Man-lu^{1, 2}, ZHAO Jin-sheng^{1, 2}, LI Guo-qi^{1, 2}, AN Qi-mei³

1. Institute of Geomechanics, Chinese Academy of Geological Sciences, Beijing 100081, China; 2. Key Laboratory of Neotectonic Movement and Geohazard, Ministry of Land and Resources, Institute of Geomechanics, Chinese Academy of Geological Sciences, Beijing100081, China; 3. Institute of Crustal Dynamics, China Earthquake Administration, Beijing 100085, China

Received:2011-03-28 Online:2012-07-11 Published:2012-07-13

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 在水压致裂应力测量压裂特征参数中，瞬时关闭压力是重要的研究内容，因为它不仅直接代表最小水平主应力，而且在计算最大水平主应力时，该值又是重要的参数。判读的准确性和可靠性直接关系到水压致裂应力测量结果的可靠性与精度。结合3个典型的水压致裂测试曲线，分析了单切线法、dp/dt方法、马斯卡特方法和dT/dP法4种常用判读关闭压力方法的取值特点和适用性。结果表明，该4种判读方法对于不同形态的水压致裂测试曲线不具有普遍适用性，因此，对不同形态的水压致裂测试曲线进行判读关闭压力时，所选取的判读方法也不同。对于岩石完整、原生裂隙及节理不发育、岩石结构致密的水压致裂压裂段，应选取以上4种方法中2种或2种以上方法进行判读瞬时关闭压力值；对于岩石完整性差、原生裂隙及节理较发育、岩石结构较破碎的水压致裂压裂段，为取得比较可靠有效的关闭压力值，建议用单切线法计算机自动取值和dp/dt方法所取的关闭压力值。

关键词: 水压致裂, 应力测量, 瞬时关闭压力

Abstract: The instantaneous shut-in pressure ( ) is an important parameter in the hydraulic fracturing characteristic parameters. Not only is it assumed to be equal the minor horizontal stress, but also is an important factor to calculate the maximum horizontal stress. The accuracy and reliability of the determination of are directly related to that of the hydraulic fracturing results. The applicability and value features of four methods (the single tangent, dp/dt, lg(p)-t and dT/dP methods) frequently used to determine ps are analyzed combined with three examples of test records. The results reveal that the four methods are lack of general applicability at different forms of pressure records. Therefore, different methods chosen to determine the instantaneous shut-in pressure are various for different pressure records of hydraulic fracturing stress test. Aiming at the hydraulic fracturing segments with intact rock, undeveloped preexisting fissures or joints and compact structure, two or more than two kinds of four methods should be applied to determine the shut-in pressure. The methods of technique of single tangent and dp/dt should be suggested to obtain more reliable value of shut-in pressure directing at hydraulic fracturing segments with incomplete rock, more developed preexisting fissures or joints and incompact structure.

Key words: hydraulic fracturing, stress measurement, instantaneous shut-in pressure

中图分类号:

TU 459

丰成君，陈群策，吴满路，赵金生，李国歧，安其美 . 水压致裂应力测量数据分析 ——对瞬时关闭压力ps的常用判读方法讨论[J]. , 2012, 33(7): 2149-2159.

FENG Cheng-jun , CHEN Qun-ce , WU Man-lu , ZHAO Jin-sheng , LI Guo-qi , AN Qi-mei . Analysis of hydraulic fracturing stress measurement data—discussion of methods frequently used to determine instantaneous shut-in pressure[J]. , 2012, 33(7): 2149-2159.

参考文献

相关文章 15

[1]	王川婴, 王益腾, 韩增强, 汪进超, 邹先坚, 胡胜, . 基于钻孔形态分析的地应力测量方法研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 549-556.
[2]	张伟, 曲占庆, 郭天魁, 孙江. 热应力影响下干热岩水压致裂数值模拟[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(5): 2001-2008.
[3]	张波, 李垚, 杨学英, 朱飘扬, 朱春帝, 刘子豪, 刘文杰, 罗志恒, . 一种用于水压致裂试验的水压供给装置研制及应用[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(5): 2022-2028.
[4]	王璞, 王成虎, 杨汝华, 侯正阳, 王洪, . 基于应力多边形与震源机制解的深部岩体应力状态预测方法初探[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(11): 4486-4496.
[5]	刘跃东，林健，冯彦军，司林坡，. 基于水压致裂法的岩石抗拉强度研究[J]. , 2018, 39(5): 1781-1788.
[6]	钟山，江权，冯夏庭，刘继光，李邵军，邱士利，吴世勇，. 锦屏深部地下实验室初始地应力测量实践[J]. , 2018, 39(1): 356-366.
[7]	王成虎，邢博瑞，. 原生裂隙水压致裂原地应力测量的理论与实践新进展[J]. , 2017, 38(5): 1289-1297.
[8]	朱元广，刘泉声，蒋景东，薛俊华，. 三向压力盒的嵌入效应及其应力测量特性模拟[J]. , 2015, 36(9): 2728-2736.
[9]	王海军，汤雷，任旭华，杨安玉，牛岩,. 低应力区岩石变形记忆效应形成机制及失忆性[J]. , 2014, 35(4): 1007-1014.
[10]	张鹏，秦向辉，丰成君，孙炜锋，谭成轩 . 郯庐断裂带山东段深孔地应力测量及其现今活动性分析[J]. , 2013, 34(8): 2329-2336.
[11]	丰成君，陈群策，谭成轩，吴满路，秦向辉. 广东核电站地应力测量及其应用[J]. , 2013, 34(6): 1745-1752.
[12]	张重远，吴满路，廖椿庭 . 金川三矿地应力测量及应力状态特征研究[J]. , 2013, 34(11): 3254-3260.
[13]	周龙寿，丁立丰，郭启攵良. 不同压裂介质影响下绝对应力测值的试验研究[J]. , 2013, 34(10): 2869-2876.
[14]	刘泉声，刘恺德. 淮南矿区深部地应力场特征研究[J]. , 2012, 33(7): 2089-2096.
[15]	郭保华. 单孔岩样水压致裂的数值分析[J]. , 2010, 31(6): 1965-1970.

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed