桩锚直径等对水泥土桩锚墙支护影响

›› 2012, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (12): 3709-3714.

桩锚直径等对水泥土桩锚墙支护影响

马海龙¹，唐志军²，石敦敦¹

1.浙江理工大学岩土工程研究所，杭州 310018；2.常熟市城市经营投资有限公司，江苏常熟 215500

收稿日期:2011-09-26 出版日期:2012-12-12 发布日期:2012-12-15
作者简介:马海龙，男，1964年生，博士，教授，主要从事岩土工程方面的教学研究工作

Influence of diameter of pile anchor etc on braced structure of cement soil pile anchor wall

MA Hai-long¹, TANG Zhi-jun², SHI Dun-dun¹

1 Institute of Geotechnical Engineering, Zhejiang Sci-Tech University, Hangzhou 310018, China; 2 Changshu City Management and investment Co., Limited, Changshu, Jiangsu 215500, China

Received:2011-09-26 Online:2012-12-12 Published:2012-12-15

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 土体采用双曲硬化模型，水泥土桩墙和水泥土桩锚采用弹塑性模型，计算分析了水泥土桩锚直径和长度对水泥土桩锚墙支护结构的影响。计算结果显示，在计算条件下，桩锚直径大于400 mm时，桩锚在饱和软黏土中的置换、占位、加筋效果明显，控制墙顶水平位移和墙后土体沉降效果显著，桩锚直径小于200 mm时，将失去置换、占位、加筋作用，从而降低对墙后土体的主动加固效果。桩锚长度达到开挖深度的1.6倍时，能有效控制墙顶水平位移以及墙后土体沉降，桩锚长度超过1.6倍开挖深度以后，控制水平位移和墙后土体沉降的效果不明显。经与同一基坑的监测数据对比，计算值与实测值重复性好、规律性好。

关键词: 水泥土桩, 基坑支护, 桩锚抗拔力, 桩墙水平位移, 土体沉降

Abstract: With soil body adopting the hyperbolic hardening model and cement-soil pile wall and anchors elastoplastic one, the influence of anchors’ diameter and length on the supportive structure has been calculated and analyzed. The results show, on the condition that the diameter reaches over 400 mm, such effects in the saturated soft clay as replacement, occupation and reinforcement are obvious; thus distinctively controlling the coping’s horizontal displacement and settlement of the soil mass behind the retaining wall; while less than 200 mm, all the functions vanish thus lowering the active reinforcement. As the anchor’s length arrives at 1.6 times as long as the excavation depth, the coping’s horizontal displacement and soil mass’s settlement behind the retaining wall would be under control in the efficient way, while exceeding that all the effects are not that clear. Compared to the monitoring data from the same foundation pit, calculated and measured values bear great repeatability and regularity.

Key words: cement soil piles, braced excavation, pile anchor withdrawal resistance, pile wall horizontal displacement, soil vertical displacement

中图分类号:

TU 47

马海龙，唐志军，石敦敦 . 桩锚直径等对水泥土桩锚墙支护影响[J]. , 2012, 33(12): 3709-3714.

MA Hai-long , TANG Zhi-jun , SHI Dun-dun . Influence of diameter of pile anchor etc on braced structure of cement soil pile anchor wall[J]. , 2012, 33(12): 3709-3714.

参考文献

相关文章 15

[1]	郭院成, 李明宇, 张艳伟, . 预应力锚杆复合土钉墙支护体系增量解析方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 253-258.
[2]	欧孝夺，全守岳，彭远胜，江杰，吕波，蒋华，. 新型装配式基坑支护结构设计与试验[J]. , 2018, 39(9): 3433-3439.
[3]	许胜才，张信贵，马福荣，陈子兴, . 水泥土桩加固边坡变形破坏特性及模型试验分析[J]. , 2017, 38(11): 3187-3196.
[4]	汪明武，赵奎元，朱其坤，蒋辉，金菊良. 基于联系累积前景理论的基坑支护方案决策[J]. , 2016, 37(S2): 622-628.
[5]	徐平，张天航，孟芳芳,. 工字钢水泥土搅拌墙基坑支护的力学性能研究[J]. , 2016, 37(S2): 769-774.
[6]	叶观宝，蔡永生，张振 , . 加芯水泥土桩复合地基桩土应力比计算方法研究[J]. , 2016, 37(3): 672-678.
[7]	李盛，马莉，王起才，李建新，李善珍，张延杰,. 考虑二期荷载的高填明洞加筋减载土压力计算[J]. , 2015, 36(11): 3229-3234.
[8]	陈春来，赵城丽，魏纲，丁智. 基于Peck公式的双线盾构引起的土体沉降预测[J]. , 2014, 35(8): 2212-2218.
[9]	刘念武，龚晓南，俞峰，房凯 , . 内支撑结构基坑的空间效应及影响因素分析[J]. , 2014, 35(8): 2293-2298.
[10]	黄银冰，赵恒博，顾长存，邵杰 . 考虑水泥土桩增强作用的灌注桩水平承载性能现场试验研究[J]. , 2013, 34(4): 1109-1115.
[11]	佟建兴，闫明礼，孙训海，杨新辉，王明山 . 夯实水泥土桩复合地基有效桩长与桩身强度关系试验研究[J]. , 2012, 33(S1): 30-36.
[12]	杨志红，郭忠贤 . 夯实水泥土桩桩身压缩量对承载特性的影响[J]. , 2012, 33(S1): 233-236.
[13]	胡春林，徐娟，肖聪. 偏心受压厚壁圆筒支护结构的应力分析[J]. , 2012, 33(7): 2117-2121.
[14]	朱志华，刘涛，单红仙. 土岩结合条件下深基坑支护方式研究[J]. , 2011, 32(S1): 619-0623.
[15]	冯庆高，周传波，傅志峰，章广成. 基坑支护方案的灰色模糊可变决策模型[J]. , 2010, 31(7): 2226-2231.

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed