›› 2013, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (4): 1097-1102.

• 岩土工程研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

风积沙地基装配式偏心基础抗拔试验研究

乾增珍1,鲁先龙1, 2,丁士君2   

  1. 1.中国地质大学(北京)工程技术学院,北京100083;2.中国电力科学研究院,北京100192
  • 收稿日期:2012-02-09 出版日期:2013-04-10 发布日期:2013-04-16
  • 作者简介:乾增珍,女,1975年生,博士,讲师,主要从事岩土工程领域的教学与科研工作。
  • 基金资助:

    国家自然科学基金资助(No.51208480)

Field tests on pullout behavior of eccentric grillage foundation in aeolian sand

QIAN Zeng-zhen1, LU Xian-long1, 2, DING Shi-jun2   

  1. 1. School of Engineering and Technology, China University of Geosciences Beijing, Beijing 100083, China; 2. China Electric Power Research Institute, Beijing 100192, China
  • Received:2012-02-09 Online:2013-04-10 Published:2013-04-16

摘要: 在毛乌素沙漠中开展装配式偏心基础在上拔、上拔+水平力组合荷载作用下的现场试验研究。根据试验加载过程中监测的基础顶部位移、地表竖向位移及基础底板土压力数据,分析基础顶部的荷载-位移特性,研究装配式偏心基础的抗拔承载机制。结果表明,(1)在上拔、上拔和水平力组合作用下,基础顶部上拔和水平位移曲线均呈二阶段的承载特性;(2)当仅受上拔荷载作用时,基础偏心引起的附加弯矩,使得基础底板产生偏转,基础及底板上覆部分沙土自重抵抗上拔荷载,而在上拔和水平力组合荷载工况下,基础偏心引起的附加弯矩小,与上拔荷载工况相比,基础极限抗拔承载力提高8.7%,即在组合荷载工况下装配式偏心基础能够发挥更多的沙土来抵抗上拔荷载;(3)根据装配式偏心基础的抗拔承载机制,引入外荷载合力作用线与支架作用线之间的夹角δ来反映水平荷载对装配式基础抗拔破坏因子的影响,其影响规律为装配式基础的抗拔破坏因子随δ增加而降低。

关键词: 装配式偏心基础, 风积沙地基, 上拔-水平力组合荷载, 抗拔破坏因子

Abstract: In MU US desert, full-scale in-site tests on the bearing capacity of eccentric grillage foundations subjected to the uplift and uplift combined with horizontal loading were carried out respectively. The load-displacement both of foundation top plane and ground surface, and the soil pressure acted on the footing slab were measured. The uplift mechanism of foundation was analyzed. The results show that under the uplift, uplift combined with horizontal loadings, the load-displacement of the eccentric grillage foundation presented two-staged behavior. Under uplift load only, the ultimate uplift resistance is assumed to be the sum of the dead weight of foundation and the soil mass contained above the bottom of the assembled slab base. The movement resulted by the eccentricity reduced the uplift bearing capacity of foundation. However, under uplift combined with horizontal loading, the ultimate uplift load increased 8.7 percent by comparison to the uplift load case. It indicate that the eccentric foundation structure is more suitable to the load case of uplift combined with horizontal loading in engineering. The angle δ , the consultant to the line from centroid of slab to top plane , is suggested to reflect the eccentricity and applied loads. According to the test results, the pullout capacity decrease rapidly with the increasing of angle δ.

Key words: eccentric grillage foundation, aeolian sand, uplift combined with horizontal loading, breakout factor

中图分类号: 

  • TU 472
[1] 乾增珍,鲁先龙,丁士君. 风积沙地基斜柱基础上拔水平力组合荷载试验[J]. , 2009, 30(1): 257-260.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 魏 丽,柴寿喜,蔡宏洲,王晓燕,李 敏,石 茜. 麦秸秆加筋材料抗拉性能的实验研究[J]. , 2010, 31(1): 128 -132 .
[2] 黄庆享,张 沛,董爱菊. 浅埋煤层地表厚砂土层“拱梁”结构模型研究[J]. , 2009, 30(9): 2722 -2726 .
[3] 孙德安,陈 波. 重塑超固结上海软土力学特性及弹塑性模拟[J]. , 2010, 31(6): 1739 -1743 .
[4] 荆志东,刘俊新. 红层泥岩半刚性基床结构动态变形试验研究[J]. , 2010, 31(7): 2116 -2121 .
[5] 刘争宏,廖燕宏,张玉守. 罗安达砂物理力学性质初探[J]. , 2010, 31(S1): 121 -126 .
[6] 张成平,张顶立,骆建军,王梦恕,吴介普. 地铁车站下穿既有线隧道施工中的远程监测系统[J]. , 2009, 30(6): 1861 -1866 .
[7] 王 军,曹 平,李江腾,刘业科. 降雨入渗对流变介质隧道边坡稳定性的分析[J]. , 2009, 30(7): 2158 -2162 .
[8] 张雪婵 ,龚晓南 ,尹序源 ,赵玉勃. 杭州庆春路过江隧道江南工作井监测分析[J]. , 2011, 32(S1): 488 -0494 .
[9] 唐世斌,唐春安,李连崇,张永彬. 湿度扩散诱发的隧洞时效变形数值模拟研究[J]. , 2011, 32(S1): 697 -0703 .
[10] 席人双,陈从新,肖国锋,黄平路. 结构面对程潮铁矿东区地表及岩体移动变形的影响研究[J]. , 2011, 32(S2): 532 -538 .