对现行规范以液性指数IL确定极限端阻力标准值qpk的质疑

›› 2003, Vol. 24 ›› Issue (2): 246-248.

对现行规范以液性指数IL确定极限端阻力标准值qpk的质疑

刘亚群¹，林长青²，李海波¹，周青春¹

1. 中国科学院武汉岩土力学研究所，湖北武汉 430071； 2. 中南建筑设计院，湖北武汉 430071

收稿日期:2002-11-11 出版日期:2003-02-10 发布日期:2014-08-19
作者简介:刘亚群，男，1974年生，助理研究员，主要从事桩基础及边坡方面的数值模拟研究。

Inquiry on determination of soil standard value of ultimate bearing capacity of end of piles by liquid index in technical code for building pile foundations

LIU Ya-qun¹, LIN Chang-qing², LI Hai-bo¹, ZHOU Qing-chun¹

1. Institute of Rock and Soil Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan 430071, China; 2. Central-South Architectural Design Institute, Wuhan 430071, China

Received:2002-11-11 Online:2003-02-10 Published:2014-08-19

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 通过对某工程单桩极限承载力标准值不满足设计要求的原因进行深入分析，指出持力层土所含的高岭土浸水软化，当受到荷载作用时，在桩端周围形成塑性剪切滑移面，产生局部剪切破坏，大大降低了桩端持力层土的极限端阻力标准值qpk，从而指出现行《建筑桩基技术规范》(JGJ 94-94)[1]仅以液性指数IL，确定极限端阻力标准值qpk值存在不足，宜综合压缩模量Es和孔隙比e而定。

关键词: 液性指数, 极限端阻力标准值, 塑性剪切滑移面, 局部剪切破坏

Abstract: For an actual project, the reason of standard ultimate bearing capacity of a single pile less than that of designing value is analyzed. It is suggested that when kaolin included in the soil at the end of piles is softened by water, a plastic shear-sliding plane will be generated. Then the soil will be in shear failure mode under static loading which significantly decreases the soil standard ultimate bearing capacity. For this case, it is not reasonable to determine the soil standard ultimate bearing capacity only by liquid index based on technical code for building pile foundations, the compression modulus and ratio of pore should be added for consideration.

Key words: liquid index, standard ultimate bearing capacity, plastic shear sliding plane, local shear failure

中图分类号:

TU 473

刘亚群，林长青，李海波，周青春,. 对现行规范以液性指数IL确定极限端阻力标准值qpk的质疑[J]. , 2003, 24(2): 246-248.

LIU Ya-qun , LIN Chang-qing , LI Hai-bo , ZHOU Qing-chun . Inquiry on determination of soil standard value of ultimate bearing capacity of end of piles by liquid index in technical code for building pile foundations[J]. , 2003, 24(2): 246-248.

参考文献

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed

本文评价

推荐阅读 10

[1]	徐金明,羌培,张鹏飞. 粉质黏土图像的纹理特征分析[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2903 -2907 .
[2]	陈锋，杨海军，杨春和. 盐岩储气库注气排卤期剩余可排卤水分析[J]. , 2009, 30(12): 3602 -3606 .
[3]	任松，姜德义，杨春和，藤宏伟. 共和隧道开裂段页岩蠕变本构试验及离散元数值模拟研究[J]. , 2010, 31(2): 416 -421 .
[4]	马文涛. 基于灰色最小二乘支持向量机的边坡位移预测[J]. , 2010, 31(5): 1670 -1674 .
[5]	高志华，赖远明，熊二刚，李波. 循环荷载作用下高温-高含冰量冻土特性试验研究[J]. , 2010, 31(6): 1744 -1751 .
[6]	王协群，张有祥，邹维列，熊海帆. 降雨入渗条件下非饱和路堤变形与边坡的稳定数值模拟[J]. , 2010, 31(11): 3640 -3644 .
[7]	朱训国，杨庆. 膨胀岩的判别与分类标准[J]. , 2009, 30(S2): 174 -177 .
[8]	曹光栩，宋二祥，徐明. 山区机场高填方地基工后沉降变形简化算法[J]. , 2011, 32(S1): 1 -5 .
[9]	刘华丽，朱大勇，钱七虎，李宏伟. 边坡三维端部效应分析[J]. , 2011, 32(6): 1905 -1909 .
[10]	刘年平，王宏图，袁志刚，刘竟成. 砂土液化预测的Fisher判别模型及应用[J]. , 2012, 33(2): 554 -557 .