›› 2008, Vol. 29 ›› Issue (5): 1188-1194.

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

锚索桩设计计算的几个力学问题及有关概念探讨

蒋良潍,黄润秋,许 强   

  1. 成都理工大学 地质灾害防治与地质环境保护国家重点实验室,成都 610059
  • 收稿日期:2006-08-10 出版日期:2008-05-10 发布日期:2013-07-24
  • 作者简介:蒋良潍,男,1974年生,博士研究生,主要从事地质工程、岩土工程方面工作。
  • 基金资助:

    国家自然科学基金“西部生态与环境”重大研究计划重点资助项目(No. 90102002)

Study of several mechanics problems and related concepts in engineering design of anchored slide-resistant piles

JIANG Liang-wei, HUANG Run-qiu, XU Qiang   

  1. State Key Laboratory of Geological Hazard Prevention and Geological Environment Protection, Chengdu University of Technology, Chengdu 610059, China
  • Received:2006-08-10 Online:2008-05-10 Published:2013-07-24

摘要: 分析探讨了锚索桩设计计算的几个力学问题及有关概念。传统上对于桩身嵌入段的计算,须根据桩身与桩周岩土的相对刚度划分为刚性桩和弹性桩两种不同的计算模型,并各自对应不同的算法及计算公式,通过对两种模型计算式的数学极限分析表明,刚性桩模型算式仅为弹性桩计算法中将嵌入段的桩身刚度取很大值下的特例,两种模型算法在力学本质上是统一的。由锚索桩嵌入段分别按弹、刚性桩模型算式的位移、转角的对比分析可知,基于弹性桩模型计算出的锚索受力大于按刚性桩模型,以弹性桩模型进行锚索设计偏于安全,而嵌入段的换算长度取1.3(“m法”)或0.8(“常数法”),从工程设计角度方可作为刚/弹性桩模型的划分判据,此时两种模型的最大位移或转角差别才小于5 %。桩上锚索倾角的力学效应除矢量分解作用影响水平锚拉力大小外,更重要的是将影响锚拉点处的水平约束刚度,进而改变锚索桩超静定结构的受力分担,因此锚索最优倾角的选取可使较好地控制桩身位移且降低锚索初拉力得以兼顾。力图令桩身正负弯矩峰值大致相等的所谓“平衡设计原则”实际上具有较强条件性,须依赖于锚索既要初拉力合适又能在正常工作状态下具备足够大的锚拉力。

关键词: 锚索抗滑桩, 嵌入段, 刚性桩模型, 弹性桩模型, 嵌入段换算长度, 锚索倾角, 约束刚度, 弯矩平衡设计原则

Abstract: Several mechanics problems and related concepts in engineering design of anchored slide-resistant piles were analyzed and discussed. There are two mechanics models and corresponding calculation methods of embedding section of anchored slide-resistant piles, which were classfied into rigid pile model and elastic pile model according to the relative rigidity of pile-soil system. By means of mathematical operation of limit, the mechanics consistency of the two calculation methods was illustrated. That is, calculation results based on rigid pile model is just only a special case of elastic pile model. Comparition results of displacement and bending angle of embedding section between the two mechanics models showed that, by using elastic pile model is more safe for determining tensile loads of anchor cable than by using rigid pile model in design of anchored slide-resistant piles. The criterion of converted length of embedding section is 1.3 (“m method”) or 0.8 (“K method”), for if calculating depth are less than them, the difference between two mechanics models are less than 5 %. Because the dip angle of pile’s anchor cable effect on horizontal restraining force and horizontal restraining rigidity as well, the optimal dip angle can give consideration to both diminish initial prestress loads of cable and decrease horizontal displacement of pile. The principle of bending moment equilibrating in engineering designs was conditional actually, because the target of making approximate equality of peak value of pile’s positive and negative bending moment extremely depends on sufficiently large tensile loads can be supplied by anchor cables and appropriate initial prestress loads were applied.

Key words: anchored slide-resistant pile, embedding section, rigid pile model, elastic pile model, converted length of embedding section, dip angle of anchor cable, restraining rigidity, principle of bending moment equilibrating

中图分类号: 

  • TU 473
[1] 吴润泽 ,周海清 ,胡 源 ,钟一洋 ,李鹏举 ,杨玖宏,. 基于有限差分原理的预应力锚索抗滑桩改进计算方法[J]. , 2015, 36(6): 1791-1800.
[2] 陈新泽. 基于FLAC3D预应力锚拉桩作用机制和加固效果研究[J]. , 2009, 30(S2): 499-504.
[3] 郑明新. 川藏公路某滑坡抗滑桩工程效果的有限元后评价[J]. , 2009, 30(6): 1782-1786.
[4] 张 伟 ,焦玉勇 ,郭小红,. 隧道洞口滑坡稳定性分析与防治措施[J]. , 2008, 29(S1): 311-314.
[5] 郑明新 ,蒋新龙 ,殷宗泽 ,吴继敏 . 预应力锚索抗滑桩工程效果的数值计算评价[J]. , 2007, 28(7): 1381-1386.
[6] 杨佑发,许绍乾 . 锚索抗滑桩内力计算的有限差分“K-K”法[J]. , 2003, 24(1): 61-64.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 肖云华,王 清,陈剑平. 基于优化技术的权重计算方法在岩体质量评价中的应用[J]. , 2009, 30(9): 2686 -2690 .
[2] 范庆来,栾茂田,刘占阁. 软土中T型触探仪贯入阻力的数值模拟[J]. , 2009, 30(9): 2850 -2854 .
[3] 张安康,陈士海,杜荣强,魏海霞. 岩石类材料的能量基率相关弹塑性损伤模型[J]. , 2010, 31(S1): 207 -210 .
[4] 王小军,屈耀辉,魏永梁,杨印海,达益正. 郑西客运专线湿陷性黄土区试验路堤的沉降观测与预测研究[J]. , 2010, 31(S1): 220 -231 .
[5] 陈 瑜,曹 平,蒲成志,刘业科,李 娜. 水-岩作用对岩石表面微观形貌影响的试验研究[J]. , 2010, 31(11): 3452 -3458 .
[6] 李明超,王忠耀,刘 杰. 水库库岸滑坡体稳定性与三维可视化模拟分析系统研究[J]. , 2009, 30(1): 270 -274 .
[7] 赵延喜,徐卫亚. 基于AHP和模糊综合评判的TBM施工风险评估[J]. , 2009, 30(3): 793 -798 .
[8] 张其一,栾茂田. 复合加载情况下非均质地基上条形基础的极限承载力研究[J]. , 2009, 30(5): 1281 -1286 .
[9] 王俊卿,李 靖,李 琦,陈 立. 黄土高边坡稳定性影响因素分析 ——以宝鸡峡引水工程为例[J]. , 2009, 30(7): 2114 -2118 .
[10] 常林越,王金昌,朱向荣. 多级线性荷载下饱和软黏土一维大应变固结解析解[J]. , 2009, 30(8): 2343 -2347 .