›› 2008, Vol. 29 ›› Issue (7): 1837-1842.

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

北京地铁工程邻近桥桩施工风险评估及控制对策探讨

李兆平1,汪 挺2,项彦勇1,张 弥1   

  1. 1.北京交通大学 土木工程学院,北京 100044;2.北京市政建设集团有限责任公司,北京 100045
  • 收稿日期:2007-05-21 出版日期:2008-07-10 发布日期:2013-07-27
  • 作者简介:李兆平,男,1966年出生,博士,主要从事地下结构设计以及地下工程施工的环境影响研究等方面的教学与研究工作。
  • 基金资助:

    北京市自然科学基金(No. 8062016)

A study on risk grade classification method and disposal measures for adjacent bridge piles in Beijing metro engineering

LI Zhao-ping1, WANG Ting2, XIANG Yan-yong1, ZHANG Mi1   

  1. 1. School of civil engineering, Beijing Jiaotong University, Beijing 100044, China; 2. Beijing Municipal Engineering Group Co., Ltd., Beijing 100045, China
  • Received:2007-05-21 Online:2008-07-10 Published:2013-07-27

摘要: 探讨了北京地铁工程邻近桥梁施工风险等级划分应考虑的因素和风险等级划分方法,建议以桥基与地铁工程开挖影响破裂面的位置关系和桥基与地铁工程的水平距离作为主要依据,确定桥梁邻近等级。在此基础上,综合考虑桥梁现状质量,确定邻近桥梁的施工风险等级,并对不同的风险等级给出了相应的邻近桥梁基础加固保护对策,从而形成了对邻近桥梁的控制与保护技术程序,最后通过一个工程实例介绍了对邻近桥桩的评估及处理。

关键词: 地铁工程, 邻近桥桩, 邻近等级, 风险等级, 施工对策

Abstract: The influential factors and classification method for risk in Beijing metro engineering are discussed in detail. Firstly, the adjacent grade of the adjacent piles must be determined. Two factors such as the spatial relationship between bridge piles and the fracture face induced by metro construction and the distance between piles and metro engineering are advised as evaluation indices. Secondly, the residual bearing capacity for adjacent bidge must be evaluated. The risk grade for adjacent bridge piles can be determined based on the adjacent grade being classified and the residual bearing capacity being certain. The different reinforcement measures must be adopted in term of the adjacent bridge piles risk grade. Consequently, the disposal procedure is formed to ensure the safety of adjacent bridge piles. Finally, a construction example for the adjacent bridge piles disposal procedure is described in detail.

Key words: metro engineering, adjacent bridge piles, adjacent grade, risk grade, construction measures

中图分类号: 

  • U 443.15
[1] 潘 健 ,周 森 ,林培源 ,马 勇 . 广州市白云区岩溶塌陷风险初探[J]. , 2013, 34(9): 2589-2600.
[2] 王者超 ,李术才 ,陈卫忠 . 分岔隧道变形监测与施工对策研究[J]. , 2007, 28(4): 785-789.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 刘 润,闫 玥,闫澍旺,乔春生. 某码头软黏土岸坡破坏机制分析及重建[J]. , 2009, 30(11): 3417 -3422 .
[2] 王先军,陈明祥,常晓林,周 伟,袁子厚. Drucker-Prager系列屈服准则在稳定分析中的应用研究[J]. , 2009, 30(12): 3733 -3738 .
[3] 陈开圣,沙爱民. 压实黄土回弹模量试验研究[J]. , 2010, 31(3): 748 -752 .
[4] 杨永波,刘明贵1,张国华,李 祺. 邻近既有隧道的新建大断面隧道施工参数优化分析[J]. , 2010, 31(4): 1217 -1226 .
[5] 孔 亮. 基于颗粒物质力学与连续介质热力学的岩土本构模型初探[J]. , 2010, 31(S2): 1 -6 .
[6] 李 鹏,刘 建,李国和,朱杰兵,刘尚各. 水化学作用对砂岩抗剪强度特性影响效应研究[J]. , 2011, 32(2): 380 -386 .
[7] 徐炎兵,韦昌富,李 幻,陈 辉. 非饱和土渗流与变形耦合问题的有限元分析[J]. , 2009, 30(5): 1490 -1496 .
[8] 杜文琪,王 刚. 土工结构地震滑动位移统计分析[J]. , 2011, 32(S1): 520 -0525 .
[9] 夏唐代 ,孙苗苗 ,陈 晨. 多重散射问题的改进算法以及双排非连续弹性屏障对水平向剪切波的隔离研究[J]. , 2011, 32(8): 2402 -2408 .
[10] 魏厚振,颜荣涛,陈 盼,田慧会,吴二林,韦昌富. 不同水合物含量含二氧化碳水合物砂三轴试验研究[J]. , 2011, 32(S2): 198 -203 .