不同围岩类别小间距隧道施工过程模拟研究

›› 2006, Vol. 27 ›› Issue (1): 11-16.

不同围岩类别小间距隧道施工过程模拟研究

李云鹏¹，王芝银¹，韩常领²，霍明²，艾传志¹

1.中国石油大学机电工程学院，北京 102249；2.中交第一公路勘察设计院，西安 710075

收稿日期:2004-08-17 出版日期:2006-01-10 发布日期:2013-10-31
作者简介:李云鹏，男，1956年生，教授，主要从事岩土力学及工程应用方面的教学与研究工作。
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目（No.50374049）资助

Simulating study on construction process of tunnels with small spacing for different classes of surrounding rocks

LI Yun-peng¹, WANG Zhi-yin¹, HAN Chang-ling², HUO Ming², AI Chuan-zhi¹

1.School of Mechanical and Electrical Engineering, China University of Petroleum, Beijing 102249, China; 2 First Highway Investigation Design and Research Institute, Ministry of Communications, Xi’an 710075, China

Received:2004-08-17 Online:2006-01-10 Published:2013-10-31

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 从不同围岩类别出发，对3车道小间距隧道采用典型双侧导坑法的开挖施工过程进行了数值模拟研究。给出了不同围岩类型下的3车道小间距隧道在施工过程中的围岩破坏特征及其变形规律和变形规律的相似性，获得了洞周最大变形量值之间的相对比值关系。通过中隔墙的变形与塑性破坏规律分析，比选出了3车道隧道中隔墙最小间距的工程设计参考值。分析表明：II类围岩合理间距不应小于0.45B，III类围岩应在0.35～0.45B之间，IV，V类围岩可在0.2～0.35B之间选择，对信息化反馈施工，指出了必须重点监控与关注的位置。为小间距隧道的发展和施工设计提供了较确切的参考数据和理论依据。

关键词: 公路, 小间距隧道, 围岩类别, 数值仿真

Abstract: Based on different classes of surrounding rocks, the numerical simulation of construction process is studied for three roadway tunnels with small spacing, adopting the typical method of double side excavation. The damage characteristic and the deformation law of surrounding rocks are given in the construction process for the different classes of surrounding rocks of three driveway tunnels. The comparability of the distributive law of deformation along the tunnel boundary is indicated for different classes of surrounding rocks; and the relative ratio of maximum displacement is obtained. By comparing the deformation and the plastic damage law in the interval wall between tunnels, the minimum spacing is selected for engineering design reference in three roadway tunnels. It is shown from analysis that the reasonable spacing is more than 0.45B for surrounding rock class II and between 0.35B and 0.45B for surrounding rock class III and between 0.20B and 0.35B for surrounding rock classification IV and V. The key locations of measurement and control are given for the feedback information construction, and these provide the reference data and the theoretical basis for the development and construction design of highway tunnels with small spacing.

Key words: highway, tunnels with small spacing, classes of surrounding rocks, numerical simulation

中图分类号:

TU 457

李云鹏，王芝银，韩常领，霍明，艾传志 . 不同围岩类别小间距隧道施工过程模拟研究[J]. , 2006, 27(1): 11-16.

LI Yun-peng , WANG Zhi-yin , HAN Chang-ling , HUO Ming , AI Chuan-zhi . Simulating study on construction process of tunnels with small spacing for different classes of surrounding rocks[J]. , 2006, 27(1): 11-16.

参考文献

相关文章 15

[1]	刘洋洋, 郭增长, 李永强, 李有鹏. 基于熵权集对分析和车载激光扫描的公路边坡危险性评价模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2018, 39(S2): 131-141.
[2]	李建斌，刘汉龙，孔纲强，肖杨，CHU Jian ，. 侧向辐射注浆技术处治现役高速公路沉降分析[J]. , 2017, 38(S1): 479-487.
[3]	朱泽奇，盛谦，程红战，李建贺，卞晓曼. 基于直接生成法的土石混合体三维随机模型构建与数值仿真研究[J]. , 2017, 38(4): 1188-1194.
[4]	王浩，豆红强，谢永宁，廖小平, . 路堑边坡全寿命周期风险评估及管理的技术框架[J]. , 2017, 38(12): 3505-3516.
[5]	崔光耀，刘维东，倪嵩陟，王明年，林国进,. 汶川地震公路隧道普通段震害分析及震害机制研究[J]. , 2015, 36(S2): 439-446.
[6]	张涛，刘松玉，蔡国军 , . 太湖软土地基沉降特性分析[J]. , 2015, 36(S1): 253-259.
[7]	彭惠，马巍，穆彦虎，金龙，朱东鹏，. 青藏公路普通填土路基长期变形特征与路基病害调查分析[J]. , 2015, 36(7): 2049-2056.
[8]	蔡灿，伍开松，廉栋，袁晓红,. 单齿冲击作用下破岩机制分析[J]. , 2015, 36(6): 1659-1666.
[9]	雷勇，刘泽. 基于H-B准则的公路桥梁桩基嵌岩深度计算[J]. , 2015, 36(2): 457-462.
[10]	崔戈，方勇，徐晨，范建国. 公路隧道下穿3层采空区施工模型试验研究[J]. , 2014, 35(S2): 257-266.
[11]	李俊平，王红星，王晓光，程贤根. 卸压开采研究进展[J]. , 2014, 35(S2): 350-358.
[12]	蒋鑫，耿建宇，曾诚，邱延峻 , . 山区公路拓宽路基与衡重式挡土墙动态相互作用的数值模拟[J]. , 2014, 35(S1): 443-450.
[13]	杨勋，王欢欢，余克勤，金先龙 , . 行波激励下防波堤地震动力响应分析[J]. , 2014, 35(6): 1775-1781.
[14]	卢正，姚海林，胡梦玲，陈平,. 基于动变形控制法的路基临界高度与湿度关系研究[J]. , 2014, 35(1): 184-188.
[15]	陈云娟，李术才，朱维申，王文，王旌. 非连续变形岩石断裂分析中的一种全长剪切锚杆[J]. , 2014, 35(1): 293-297.

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed