双跨连拱隧道两种中墙的空间力学效应分析

›› 2006, Vol. 27 ›› Issue (4): 667-672.

双跨连拱隧道两种中墙的空间力学效应分析

李强^{1, 2}，王明年²，李玉文³

1. 铁道第四勘察设计院，武汉 430063；2. 西南交通大学地下工程系，成都 610031；3. 四川省公路勘察设计研究院，成都 610041

收稿日期:2004-08-09 出版日期:2006-04-10 发布日期:2013-11-05
通讯作者: 王明年，男，1966年生，博士，教授，博士生导师，主要从事地下工程科研工作。E-mail: mingnaia_w@sohu.com E-mail:02011053@163.com
作者简介:李强，男，1976年生，工学硕士，主要从事复杂隧道施工力学研究

Three-dimensional mechanical effect analysis of two types of midboard for double span-arch-connecting tunnel

LI Qiang^{1, 2}, WANG Ming-nian², LI Yu-wen³

1. The Fourth Survey & Design Institute of China Railway, Wuhan 430063, China; 2. Department of Underground and Tunnel Engineering, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu 610031, China; 3. Sichuan Provincial Communications Department Highway Planning Survey Design ＆Research Institute, Chengdu 610041, China

Received:2004-08-09 Online:2006-04-10 Published:2013-11-05

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 针对双跨连拱隧道设计和施工中存在的问题，采用三维有限差分程序FLAC3D2.0，对两种中墙结构的空间受力特征进行了研究，对比分析各自的优缺点及适用条件，并提出了施工注意事项。研究结果表明，在II类围岩地质条件下浅埋连拱隧道采用分离式曲中墙结构受力较为合理；左洞掌子面距研究断面3倍洞径时，中墙内力已稳定；左右洞掌子面距研究断面(－1～+1)D的施工，是中墙内力变化较大的关键工序。

关键词: 双跨连拱隧道, 中墙, 空间力学效应, 三维有限差分

Abstract: Aiming at open problems in the design and construction of double span arch-connecting tunnel, a research on three-dimensional stress characteristics of two types midboard is carried out by means of finite difference method FLAC3D2.0; and their merits and demerits, as well as applicable conditions are analyzed. The result shows that stress of separated type curved wall is more proper than integral type stalk on shallow depth double span arch-connecting tunnel in the condition of II type rock; inner force of midboard has been in stabilization when left cavern heading face drives to three times diameter from researched cross-section; while right and left cavern heading face drives to (–1–1)D time diameter from reseached cross-section, inner force of midboard greatly changes, and these constructions are key processes.

Key words: double span arch-connecting tunnel, midboard, three-dimensional mechanical effect, 3-D finite difference method

中图分类号:

U 456

李强，王明年，李玉文 . 双跨连拱隧道两种中墙的空间力学效应分析[J]. , 2006, 27(4): 667-672.

LI Qiang , WANG Ming-nian , LI Yu-wen . Three-dimensional mechanical effect analysis of two types of midboard for double span-arch-connecting tunnel[J]. , 2006, 27(4): 667-672.

参考文献

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed

本文评价

推荐阅读 10

[1]	杨锡鎏，周翠英. 基于ANSYS与OpenGL的高速公路结构物仿真建模及三维地层地表修剪方法[J]. , 2010, 31(2): 571 -576 .
[2]	董志良，陈平山，莫海鸿，张功新. 真空预压下软土渗透系数对固结的影响[J]. , 2010, 31(5): 1452 -1456 .
[3]	许英，李同春，莫建兵. 沉桩超孔隙水压力对码头边坡稳定的影响[J]. , 2010, 31(8): 2525 -2529 .
[4]	张成平，张顶立，王梦恕，李倩倩，刘胜春. 城市隧道施工诱发的地面塌陷灾变机制及其控制[J]. , 2010, 31(S1): 303 -309 .
[5]	雷金波，陈从新. 基于双曲线模型的带帽刚性桩复合地基荷载传递机制研究[J]. , 2010, 31(11): 3385 -3391 .
[6]	冷毅飞，张喜发，杨凤学，姜龙，赵意民. 冻土未冻水含量的量热法试验研究[J]. , 2010, 31(12): 3758 -3764 .
[7]	杜延军，金飞，刘松玉，陈蕾，张帆. 重金属工业污染场地固化/稳定处理研究进展[J]. , 2011, 32(1): 116 -124 .
[8]	姜彤，王伟，崔江利，陈贤挺. 滑坡临滑预报的态矢量方法研究[J]. , 2009, 30(6): 1747 -1752 .
[9]	胡其志，冯夏庭，周辉. 考虑温度损伤的盐岩蠕变本构关系研究[J]. , 2009, 30(8): 2245 -2248 .
[10]	尹小涛，郑亚娜，马双科. 基于颗粒流数值试验的岩土材料内尺度比研究[J]. , 2011, 32(4): 1211 -1215 .