›› 2013, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (S2): 344-350.

• 岩土工程研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

大厚度自重湿陷性黄土地基处理深度和剩余湿陷量问题的合理控制

张世径1,黄雪峰1, 2,朱彦鹏1,杨校辉1,姚志华2   

  1. 1. 兰州理工大学 土木工程学院,兰州 730050;2. 解放军后勤工程学院 建筑工程系,重庆 401311
  • 收稿日期:2013-04-17 出版日期:2013-11-11 发布日期:2013-11-19
  • 作者简介:张世径,男,1987年生,硕士研究生,主要从事特殊土与非饱和土、桩基工程方面的研究工作。
  • 基金资助:
    国家电网公司科学技术项目(No.SGKJJSKF[2008]656)。

Foundation treatment depth and reasonable control on remnant collapse in area of dead weight collapse loess with great thickness

ZHANG Shi-jing1,HUANG Xue-feng1,2,ZHU Yan-peng1,YANG Xiao-hui1,YAO Zhi-hua2   

  1. 1. School of Civil Engineering, Lanzhou University of Science and Technology, Lanzhou 730050, China; 2. Department of Architectural Engineering, Logistical Engineering University of PLA, Chongqing 401311, China
  • Received:2013-04-17 Online:2013-11-11 Published:2013-11-19

摘要: 为研究大厚度自重湿陷性黄土地区地基处理深度与剩余湿陷量的合理控制关键技术难题,对采用不同处理深度的挤密地基进行了大面积深层浸水载荷试验。试验结果表明:对采用挤密地基处理在6~12 m深度以下进行深层浸水后均发生不同程度的地基湿陷下沉,而地基处理在15 m深度时(剩余湿陷量远大于200 mm)地基整体实际下沉量相对较小,说明现行的《湿陷性黄土地区建筑规范》对乙、丙类建筑地基关于最小处理深度的规定过于严格,不符合现有的经济技术水平,建议在采取一定措施的情况下将12~15 m作为乙、丙类建筑在大厚度自重湿陷性黄土地区地基处理的合理深度。并针对现行规范中对乙、丙类建筑剩余湿陷量控制的不合理之处,提出了“剩余湿陷量折减系数” 这个概念,并提出了该折减系数的建议值,可为同类工程建设和规范修订提供一定的参考。

关键词: 大厚度自重湿陷性黄土, 挤密地基, 深层浸水, 剩余湿陷量, 合理处理深度, 剩余湿陷量折减系数

Abstract: In order to research the reasonable controlling critical technical problem of ground treatment and remnant collapse in the area of dead weight collapse loess with great thickness, a large area and deep level immersion load test was made for pile ground by using different treatment depths. The test results indicate that the foundation treated by the pile ground would have the occurrence of different degrees of foundation collapse settlement after deep immersion in the range of 6-12 m. The remnant collapse of foundation treatment in the depth of 15 m is more than 200 mm; and the foundation’s whole subsidence is relatively small. This phenomenon indicates that the current regulation, Code for Building Construction in Collapsible Loess Regions, is too strict about the minimum depth of treatment for class B and class C building foundations; and it dose not agree with the current standards of economy and technology. It is suggested that the 12-15 m could regard as the foundation treatment rational depth for class B and class C buildings in the area of dead weight collapse loess with great thickness. In light of unreasonable regulations about the remnant collapse of class B and class C buildings in current code, this article puts forward the concept of “remnant collapse reduction factor” and its recommended value, so as to give a reference for the same kind of construction projects and code revision.

Key words: dead weight collapse loess with great thickness, pile ground, deep level immersion, remnant collapse, treatment rational depth, remnant collapse reduction factor

中图分类号: 

  • TU444
[1] 朱彦鹏, 杜晓启, 杨校辉, 栗慧王君, . 挤密桩处理大厚度自重湿陷性黄土地区综合 管廊地基及其工后浸水试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(8): 2914-2924.
[2] 姚志华 ,黄雪峰 , 陈正汉 ,方祥位 ,苗强强 ,张江水,. 关于黄土湿陷性评价和剩余湿陷量的新认识[J]. , 2014, 35(4): 998-1006.
[3] 黄雪峰 ,张广平 ,姚志华 ,张建华. 大厚度自重湿陷性黄土湿陷变形特性水分入渗规律及地基处理方法研究[J]. , 2011, 32(S2): 100-108.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 付宏渊,吴胜军,王桂尧. 荷载作用引起砂土渗透性变化的试验研究[J]. , 2009, 30(12): 3677 -3681 .
[2] 雷红军,卞 锋,于玉贞,孙 逊. 黏土大剪切变形中的渗透特性试验研究[J]. , 2010, 31(4): 1130 -1133 .
[3] 穆彦虎,马 巍,孙志忠,刘永智. 青藏铁路块石路基冷却降温效果对比分析[J]. , 2010, 31(S1): 284 -292 .
[4] 彭 琦,张 茹,谢和平,曲宏略,龙 盎. 基于AE时间序列的岩爆预测模型[J]. , 2009, 30(5): 1436 -1440 .
[5] 张亚民,马凤山,徐嘉谟,赵海军. 高应力区露天转地下开采岩体移动规律[J]. , 2011, 32(S1): 590 -0595 .
[6] 张开鹏,熊燕文,夏元友,刘新喜. 超载预压加固软土路基效果数值分析[J]. , 2011, 32(S1): 648 -0651 .
[7] 周万欢 ,殷建华. 上覆压力和剪胀作用下土钉抗拔的有限元模拟[J]. , 2011, 32(S1): 691 -0696 .
[8] 安永林 ,彭立敏 ,张 峰 ,吴 波. 隧道施工时地表沉降监测控制标准探讨[J]. , 2009, 30(S2): 446 -451 .
[9] 钱建固 ,黄茂松. 土体塑性各向异性的微宏观机理分析[J]. , 2011, 32(S2): 88 -93 .
[10] 左宇军 ,李术才 ,朱万成 ,张义平. 深部断续节理岩体中渗流对巷道稳定性影响的数值分析[J]. , 2011, 32(S2): 586 -591 .