›› 2006, Vol. 27 ›› Issue (11): 1963-1966.

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

合肥地区膨胀土路基处置深度问题探讨

余 飞,陈善雄,许锡昌,余 颂   

  1. 中国科学院武汉岩土力学研究所,武汉 430071
  • 收稿日期:2005-06-06 出版日期:2006-11-10 发布日期:2013-12-04
  • 作者简介:余飞,男,1978年生,博士,助理研究员,主要从事非饱和土理论与工程特性研究
  • 基金资助:

    国家自然科学基金资助项目(No. 50279050)。

Study on determination of treatment depth for expansive soil subgrade in Hefei

YU Fei, CHEN Shan-xiong, XU Xi-chang, YU Song   

  1. Institute of Rock and Soil Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan 430071, China
  • Received:2005-06-06 Online:2006-11-10 Published:2013-12-04

摘要: 采用统计分析气候资料和现场测试含水率的方法,对合肥地区大气影响深度进行了研究,其结果表明,按气象资料统计分析法计算的大气影响深度比实际值小。在此基础上,建议按膨胀力与零膨胀率的相关性来确定膨胀土路基处置深度。通过合肥地区18个代表性土样的膨胀力试验,给出了膨胀力与零膨胀率的相关曲线,为膨胀土路基处置深度的确定提供了可靠的依据。最后,给出了合肥地区膨胀土路基不同结构部位处置深度的建议。

关键词: 膨胀土路基, 广义湿度系数, 大气影响深度, 零膨胀率, 处置深度

Abstract: The depth of soil layer which influenced by climate in Hefei is studied by way of climate environmental data and field experiment of water content. It can be found that the calculated depth of the layer according to climate environmental data is smaller than the real value. On this foundation, the determination method of treatment depth for subgrade paved with expansive soil is proposed based on the relationship of swelling pressure and unloaded expansibility. The correlative curve of the expansive pressure and the unloaded expansibility is established by means of swelling pressure test of eighteen representative soils selected from Hefei. It provides reliable references for determining the treatment depth of subgrade. Finally, some suggestions of treatment depth for the different structure positions of subgrade are given.

Key words: expansive soil subgrade, generalized moisture coefficient, climate influenced layer, unloaded expansibility, treatment depth

中图分类号: 

  • TU 441
[1] 杨和平 ,王 静 ,湛文涛 ,李艳艳. 南宁外环膨胀土路基处治技术及设计方案研究[J]. , 2011, 32(S2): 359-365.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 金洪波,张世文,黄元仿. 可拓理论在矿区土地破坏程度评价中的应用[J]. , 2010, 31(9): 2704 -2710 .
[2] 卢 正,姚海林,程 平,吴万平. 非均布列车荷载作用下软土路基的振动分析[J]. , 2010, 31(10): 3286 -3294 .
[3] 徐士良,朱合华,丁文其,刘宝许. 秦岭公路隧道通风竖井岩爆预测和防治措施[J]. , 2009, 30(6): 1759 -1763 .
[4] 印长俊 ,王星华 ,夏力农 . 大直径嵌岩桩残余应变状态分析[J]. , 2008, 29(11): 3095 -3098 .
[5] 柳国环 ,练继建 ,王鸿振 ,于通顺,. 水动力质量实效施加方法及地基-筒型基础-塔筒体系的地震敏感性研究[J]. , 2016, 37(3): 767 -775 .
[6] 纪文栋,张宇亭,王 洋,裴文斌, . 循环单剪下珊瑚钙质砂和普通硅质砂剪切特性对比研究[J]. , 2018, 39(S1): 282 -288 .
[7] 周恩全, 朱晓冬, 陆建飞, 王炳辉, . 液化后砂土流体特性测试装置的研发及试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2018, 39(12): 4698 -4706 .